Queerty contributor Mark S. King has this unique take on the Charlie Sheen interview.
The subtle moment came during the second segment of Matt Lauer’s explosive interview with actor Charlie Sheen. It impressed me so deeply I actually backed up my recording and watched it twice more.
Sheen had already endured the first segment of his time with Lauer, during which he resembled an uneasy hostage trying to charm his captors. Gone were most of the features of the train wreck we have come to know as Charlie Sheen: the mania, the twitches and glazed eyes, the bloviated pronouncements delivered with the bravado of a crack cocaine messiah.
That public meltdown was in 2011, a millennia in celebrity years. The humbled, visibly nervous man on The Today Show had his back against a wall, forced to reveal his HIV positive status on the eve of venomous tabloids doing it for him.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
And so, the immensely privileged actor found himself in a position known all too well by those of us who live with HIV: having to disclose our status and pray to God the response will be at least civil, if not empathetic. Except, of course, Sheen did it under the blaze of studio lighting, with high definition cameras searching for any betraying signals on a face layered with makeup and apprehension.
The moment that transfixed me came after an endless commercial break – several minutes of corporate pigs at the trough, lapping up the ratings slop of Sheen’s misfortune. Sheen had already made his HIV disclosure and had begun building a case against the extortions of his former sex partners and confidantes. It wasn’t the most relatable storyline with which to lead, but it was presented through a veiled, undeniable personal agony.
And then, Lauer announced he had messages from Twitter he wanted to share, fresh off the internet presses, containing reactions to Sheen’s HIV disclosure from the town square of cyberspace. Sheen’s face changed. On live television, in front of a blockbuster audience the world over, Charlie Sheen would now hear exactly what people thought of him, his story, and most unnervingly, his HIV status.
Lauer began to read. “Laura says, ‘You have brought me to tears. I am profoundly touched by your honesty…’” The camera had moved to a graphic of the tweets and Sheen was not visible. Lauer was continuing with a second message. “For the first time in a long time you can be proud of yourself,” he read, “Now you’re really winning.”
The camera cut to Sheen, who fumbled out a “wow… that’s lovely,” although he still seemed to be holding his breath. Lauer continued with a third message. “Now you own your truth,” the message read. “Good on you, Charlie Sheen. Respect.”
And it was in this moment, as Lauer finished the third of three consecutive responses, all of them supportive, that the camera revealed something barely perceptible but achingly human.
Charlie Sheen raised his shoulders slightly in a shallow intake of breath, and then let it out, shifting in his chair as if to mask it, while his eyes found a place of exquisite, emotional relief that no mere actor could ever muster.
It was the sigh of a thousand gulps of air, the release of months of secrecy and loneliness, of doubt and the very real fear of what lies beyond the words “I am HIV positive.”
It was then that I recognized the man on the television screen. He was every HIV positive person who has ever had to make a revelation that holds the acceptance of our loved ones and co-workers and friends in its precarious balance.
And, at least in that instant, fate was merciful to Charlie Sheen.
The backlash, as if duty bound, has begun. Much has been breathlessly reported about the veracity of Sheen’s statements, the lawsuits, the blame and recriminations, and even his residual tiger blood bluster that he might be the man to deliver a cure. None of the nonsense to come can nullify the fact that the critical words “undetectable viral load” have been written, spoken, and defined more in the last few days than in the entire history of HIV advocacy.
There will be plenty of time to assess the fallout of Charlie Sheen’s disclosure, for better or worse. For now, I remain struck by the eyes of a vulnerable man during his singular, desperate moment of grace.
And in them, a glimmer of hope for us all.
Philip Scott Hoel
Brian JC Kneeland
he still has not learned to own his life and consequences! He will soon!
BJ McFrisky
Awwww, the creepiest millionaire in America has feeeeewings.
Doesn’t change the fact that he’s a narcissistic, disease-spreading egomaniac who should lose everything he has if he infected even one person.
aliengod
Wow. Such a flowery article. Fact is, this man acted incredibly irresponsible and contracted a deadly disease and then exposed countless others to it by having sex with them. Most likely, he will lose his fortune to the coming lawsuits, and in my opinion, rightly so.
Stache
@BJ McFrisky: Yeah, much like the Republican Party.
Yeah, he was irresponsible but there’s no proof that he’s spread anything. I’m sure there will be allot of wolves looking for a payday though.
BJ McFrisky
@Stache: “Wolves” — that’s a funny term for those who’ve been potentially infected with a fatal disease by a self-serving prick (pun fully intended).
alphacentauri
@Stache: Please, do you really believe he used condoms with every man, woman, and trans person he had sex with including hookers?
Sansacro
I hate that phrase “own [your] own truth.” Unemployed graduates from over-priced liberal arts colleges writing the copy, no doubt. Time to disown, kids.
onthemark
@alphacentauri: Assuming he was on the proper medications and his viral load was “undetectable,” he couldn’t possibly have infected anyone.
Jaroslaw
My all the negative Nancy’s here. The author says in his last line that there will be more than enough time to assess the disclosure. He is writing about a specific topic in the interview – the man’s vulnerability. He never excused carelessness, ego, cocaine usage etc.
Now Mr. Sheen is far from my favorite person or actor, and based on his history, he probably WAS careless. But we do not know that he didn’t use condoms and we also know that many many people are starstruck and will have sex regardless – they have plenty of responsibility too for their OWN carelessness.
And to BJ Frisky – he should lose everything if he infected even one person? Maybe, but assuming you have the same standards for everyone and everything, the world would be unworkable and plus that will never happen. The majority of Congress and all Presidents have plenty to account for – tens of thousands of deaths and injuries…………corporate greed and negligence leading to deaths of workers…..selling faulty products outside the USA…..we could go on and on. But lets dump all our vitriol on Charlie instead.
Masc Pride
@aliengod: Not only that, he’s only “living his truth” now because he ran out of hush money and was about to be exposed. Now he’s all “this is the new me”. Did you read that open letter he (Howard Bragman) wrote? I think we’re all seeing Charlie’s acting abilities may be a bit better than we all thought.
Brian
You catch HIV mainly due to carelessness, recklessness and promiscuity. Therefore, I have no sympathy for Charlie Sheen. I also have no sympathy for the women he mixed with. They were all swimming in the same pool. They made choices.
They are victims of their own choices.
Xzamilio
I just heard there is a video of Charlie Sheen doing crack and sucking a man’s peen peen. Queerty, get on that… and post a link, thank you.
Masc Pride
@onthemark: It is NOT impossible for an HIV+ person to infect others while “undetectable”. There is still HIV in the blood. When will this community finally learn that lowered risk doesn’t mean no risk?
Alistair Wiseman
@Sansacro:
And watching to much Oprah.
Alistair Wiseman
@Sansacro:
And watching too much Oprah.
onthemark
@Masc Pride: Show a documented case, you can’t find one.
notevenwrong
Judging by the reactions here and in the popular press, there has been no progress in public perception of HIV since the Rock Hudson disclosure right at the beginning of the epidemic in the 80s, when there was this big panic about Linda Evans kissing him during the filming of Dynasty.
onthemark
@Masc Pride: (sigh) – My bf tells me my last statement could be misconstrued. (He points out there is always some doofus who’s looking for ANY dumbass excuse to bareback!)
The real danger in Charlie Sheen’s case – or any similar case – is that window of time between the latest HIV-negative test (if any) and the HIV-positive test. This is the time when HIV-positive people are highly infectious. But most of them in that situation are under the incorrect impression they’re still negative! If Charlie put anyone at risk, it was during this period.
Compared to that very REAL risk, it’s silly to worry about the infinitesimal (if that) “risk” of someone who is, indeed, genuinely undetectable.
And of course, if a stranger tells you he’s undetectable, you shouldn’t just assume he’s telling the truth.