Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

TLA Markets Gay Films By Linking Them With Accused Molester Jerry Sandusky

Gay-owned video retailer TLA.com has removed a tasteless web page (link NSFW) grouping gay-themed indies and art films under the banner “What Would Jerry Sandusky Watch”?

TLA editor Robby O. wrote:

You’d think that with coaching, his non-profit and taking all those long showers, Penn State’s Jerry Sandusky would not have a lot of free time. Oh contraire! He is a ferocious movie-goer with specialized tastes. We sat down with him (actually, we sent our 11-year-old nephew so he’d open up more) and asked him to name a few of his favorites… after all, he’s gonna have a lot of free time soon to watch them all again.

Mr. O included films with titles like Cold Showers, Punish Me and Schoolboy Crush—along with movies about child molestation, including Capturing the Friedmans and Happiness.

Hey, why not include Nightmare on Elm Street?

TLA later removed the page and offered an apology:

A few days ago we posted an article that caused distress among some customers. While clearly satirical in nature and not a “sales-driven” piece as some have suggested—over 1/3 of the films that were mentioned are out of print and not available to purchase, and all were legitimate art, foreign or independent works—it struck a nerve with some. As a gay-owned and operated business on the forefront of LGBT issues for over 30 years, we have always taken jabs at current events and pop culture.

But in this instance our sense of humor did not come through in the way that we intended, and for that we apologize.

Yes, it takes a sophisticated sense of satire to understand Mr. O’s humor.

It’s not enough that anti-gay nutjobs call gays pedophiles, now a company that caters to us has done so as well.

On:           Dec 27, 2011
Tagged: , ,
    • LandStander

      Never using their services. Some pretty sick people!

      Dec 27, 2011 at 1:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ChrisC

      Are they so far removed from the problems we face (hate groups and their lies) that they think lumping us into the category of pedophiles would be a fine move? What idiots.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeffr

      Thank you for bringing this to our attention, Daniel! TLA should fire the moron who thought that this was funny! Best, JeffR

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ~R~

      It was an attempt at being witty and it failed but TLA is still one of my favorite online stores so I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Derek Puleo

      Good lord that is disgusting, and to think I use to shop there! :(

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dvlaries

      You mean not one person at TLA offered out loud, “Hey, you know, Sandusky’s victims are still alive…? Jeez.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alan brickman

      Please find out who created this tasteless and hurtful campaign and report back to us…after firing them…kids who are questioning/dealing with their sexuality don’t need to have the idea they are perverts if they watch gay fims…

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alan brickman

      Please find out who created this tasteless and hurtful campaign and report back to us…after firing them…kids who are questioning/dealing with their sexuality don’t need to have the idea they are perverts if they watch gay films…

      Dec 27, 2011 at 2:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Erik

      For real, Queerty? Take a break from your ersatz shock and horreur. you post tasteless and obnoxious satire all the time. And i’m not bashing you for it: part of the fun of being gay, is (aside from flower arranging, track lighting, and our ability to accessorize) being able to poke fun at things like this. The apology appears genuine, they took the page down. Take a Valium and stop trying to bash gay businesses, there are plenty of other folks who do that professionally.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 3:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andy

      Commenters 1-8 have a stick up their ass and not in good way.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 3:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ala Brickman

      Someone sounds hypocritical….

      Dec 27, 2011 at 5:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jj

      Pretty hilarious, thanks TLA.

      Remember guys, at the end of the day, if this had been an adult female sexing up these boys, none of this drama would be happening. The events would be the stuff of late night comedian fodder. There would be no candle light vigils for the victims. That is the reality of hetero society.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 5:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris

      @jj: Nonsense. These boys were ten. Nobody approves of adult women having anal sex with ten year old boys.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 5:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • NN

      At 10 years old, it’s never “sexing up” whether done by men or women – it’s just rape. If it were an adult male with 10 year old girls, no one would be making jokes about it. I cannot believe anyone would make jokes about a woman going after pre-teens either

      Dec 27, 2011 at 6:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lance

      I didn’t check the entire repertoire of films under that section, but I have to say that, from the picture above, Boys Love/Schoolboy Crush has nothing to do with pedophilia and is simply about two high school guys in love. What a surprise.

      The difference is very clear in that, while some others are indeed about abuse or age difference in relationships, there were probably plenty of other films that just dealt with underage boys falling in love, which is something that is very objectionable when they are linked to rapists (also tragically ironic coming from an LGBT site).

      Ultimately, I personally find it staggering for anyone to make jokes/try to cash in on such heinous crimes.

      @Chris: I wish this were the case, but sadly it isn’t so. There is this ever-prevalent macho image where, as long as you are not being “penetrated” in any way, it should be enjoyable for you and doesn’t actually constitute as rape. You can easily check news websites that report these crimes and about half the comments will be along the lines of “what a stud” or “I wish I had been that kid growing up”. It really is quite disturbing.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 6:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JohnAGJ

      Oh swell. Way to feed into the stereotypes foisted upon by every rightwing nutjob out there, TLA. Schmucks.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 7:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason

      This is an example of how gays can be their own worst enemies. There are tons of self-loathing gays out there who don’t give a rats about gay rights so long as they can get their rocks off in bath houses.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 7:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mark

      JJ is right- if Sandusky had been a hot female, this would be a fraction of the story it is now. But maybe THAT is the problem. Maybe the problem is that we treat sexual abuse by women lightly, rather than the problem being that we take sexual abuse by men so seriously. JJ, you’re a fucking idiot.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason

      If Sandusky had been a female, they’d be hanging garlands on him, not hanging him.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jj

      And Mark, you completely miss the point. Thank you and you’re welcome.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mark

      @jason: So are you suggesting that we stop feel bad for Sandusky, a child rapist, because he’s a guy?

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • geoff

      @jj: “Sexing-up” ??? You need to do some waking-up.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason


      I’m simply saying that there’s a double standard which treats female perpetrators less harshly than male ones. You see it in the justice system too.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 8:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Caliban

      And what the fuck does any of that have to do with the MORONIC idea to advertise gay-themed films featuring young people to a GAY audience using a notorious PEDOPHILE?!

      Jesus. I have a pitch-black sense of humor but considering that the Religious Right is very busily trying to tar the gay community by associating us with Sandusky and paeople like him it’s really fucking STUPID to use his name and photo in an advertisement aimed at gay people!

      Is it really that goddamn hard to figure out?!

      Dec 27, 2011 at 9:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice

      People make mistakes. Nothing to lose sleep over since they corrected the issue.

      Meanwhile many gays are dumb enough to pay money for condomless sex vids and contribute to the glorification and profiteering off this stuff while HIV rates for gay men remain high.

      That’s more disturbing.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 9:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jason


      HIV rates for gay men are not high. HIV rates for promiscuous men who have sex with total strangers are high. There’s a difference.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 10:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • CBRad

      Mega-blunder on TLA’s part ! Huge! But…they apologized and removed it, so….let it go.

      Dec 27, 2011 at 10:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kurt

      I’ve been a customer of TLA videos in Philadelphia for decades and I will continue to be one.

      Dec 28, 2011 at 12:48 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Awwwwwkward

      “It’s not enough that anti-gay nutjobs call gays pedophiles, now a company that caters to us has done so as well.”

      From the mouths of pornographers….

      Embarrassing when the truth slips out.

      Dec 28, 2011 at 1:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Johnny

      Alan Brickman, thanks for nailing this issue. The constant cross currents of opinion, like those rendered by that idiot cunt Michelle Bachmann, plant constant guilt and doubt in the minds of younger gay men. Many years ago there was a giant gay rally on the mall in Washington, D.C. There is a phrase from that speech that was so chilling and accurate, I will never forget it. “Look at our numbers!” I don’t remember if the park service issued an estimate of people there, like they do now. But it was well over 150,000. And that is exactly what the so called conservative right, who are watching gay porn in the dark late at night and fucking their wives in the ass, just don’t get. Our numbers are astounding and are growing at a phenomenal pace, thanks to the media and Hollywood validating the gay lifestyle.

      Dec 28, 2011 at 1:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Seaguy

      It was a tacky ad that blew up in their face but I am also not some queen who screams boycott everytime something I do not agree with is said or done. So many gay people spend time fighting others in our own community instead of focusing the fight on the real enemy the right wing homophobes! Sad that some are so petty and bitter.

      Dec 28, 2011 at 6:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • christopher di spirito

      What’s more sexually exciting than watching a porno movie favored by child-rapist Jerry Sandusky? What’s next for TLA? Porno movies enjoyed by Pope RatNAZI?

      Dec 28, 2011 at 9:54 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • iDavid


      You’re wrong. There are women who have molested boys doing life in prison. The numbers are fewer than men for many reasons, but if they are brought to trial, they are served as harshly as men.

      School teachers and students (teens) are a different class of conviction depending on state law. Molesting young boys Sandusky style is slammer time for all, no exceptions on any level.

      Dec 28, 2011 at 1:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Geno

      This was/is/and is funny , made. ME lol I just wish I. Received the TLA catalog in the mail so I. Could put the darn thing on my refrigerator door 4 a few more laughs. I <3 this kind of sH*T!

      Dec 28, 2011 at 8:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jensen


      Your sexism and misogyny is well known. Your ability to ignore the fact that many women have been sent to prison for statutory rape is amazing. How often have we witnessed female school teachers convicted and sent to prison?

      Dec 29, 2011 at 9:43 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bobby Sands

      Could Erik (No. 9) be Erik Schut, the actual person who wrote the original TLA article?

      Dec 29, 2011 at 10:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • B

      No. 36 · Bobby Sands wrote, “Could Erik (No. 9) be Erik Schut, the actual person who wrote the original TLA article?”

      Maybe Eric (No. 9) is the reincarnation of Jonathan Swift, who once published a modest proposal for ending a potato famine in Ireland — by having poor people sell their children to rich folks who would eat the kids for dinner. He parodied arguments used to justify various ill-conceived social policies.

      Erik Schut’s problem (assuming he is the person responsible) is that he can’t write at the same level as Jonathan Swift. It’s no suprise – very few can write that well.

      Jan 2, 2012 at 3:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.