People should really leave tweeting to the professionals. James Malliff, a senior Tory councilmember in Buckinghamshire, England has been suspended for posting that Conservatives “‘may as well legalise marriage with animals” if they went ahead with Prime Minister David Cameron plan to approve marriage equality.
After onetime Conservative MP Paul Goodman asked him via Twitter whether legitimizing gay marriage would lead to multiple Sharia marriages being made lawful, Malliff tweeted the following reply:
“There is no doubt the PM is wrong on this issue. We may as well legalise marriage with animals, crude I concede but no apology.”
Another tweet on his feed read: “Great keynote address by David Cameron, not sure about legalising gay marriage though, what happened to sanctity of marriage #odd.”
Isn’t England’s Prince Charles now married to his mistress—the woman he professed he wanted to be a tampon for?
Sanctity went out the window a while ago, James.
Michael
Good finally people are sending these bigots a message that their intolerance and ignorance will not be tolerated nor respected under any circumstances.
Also an animal can not consent a human being can.An animal can not sign a marriage certificate etc…That beastiality argument has ALWAYS been a major fallacy and has never made any logical or rational sense whatsoever.
Chris Madoch 'The Queer Messiah'
Mmm! SUSPENDED by his nipple rings and whipped by dungeon mistress. The hypocrite shit.
robert
He’s not a Member of Parliament but a councillor, a representitive in local government not national government – so both the title and photo are wrong.
However, still embarassing for David Cameron. Never a truer word was said when some years ago Theresa May (now Home Secretary) said that the Conservatives were perceived as the ‘nasty party’.
Terry
The bible clearly condemns bestiality.
the crustybastard
@Terry:
Wow, what a keen insight.
Thanks for sharing.
Patsy Stoned
Funny how this type of idiocy gets you suspended in the UK, and in the US it makes you a perfect Republican candidate in most states.
And if half the Royal family is any indication, Britain sanctioned human and horse marriages ages ago.
the crustybastard
@Patsy Stoned:
Oh, nice one, Pats. Cheers, sweetie.
Little Kiwi
It’s 2011. How can these dunces continue to ignore the logical factual reality that an animal cannot sign a marriage license?
Riker
@Patsy Stoned: What does Sarah Jessica Parker have to do with any of this?
Michael
@Riker:
LMFAO!
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
Looks like someone is vying for the GOP VP slot……………….
Sohobod
I don’t know why Queerty are having a go at Charles and Camilla. The royal family are just about the most gay-friendly institution on earth (before it was fashionable). look up the Queen Mother’s friendship and loyalty to her butler (including getting his out of a few embarrassing scrapes) ‘Back Stairs Billy’.
And just about working in everyone at Buckingham Palace is gay.
Patsy Stoned
@ The Crustybastard – cheers, sweetie, thanks a lot.
@ Riker — LOL, darling just because Sarah Horsica Parker is married to a queen it does NOT make her royalty.
Carl
@Sohobod: It’s just fashionable to take the piss out of the Royals – and since Prince Phillip hasn’t opened his gob recently the next in line (pun intended) is Charles and his missus.
As others have said, the Royals have always been pretty cool with the gay community – and I tend to discount anything Prince Phillip says as the obnoxious old git is rude about pretty much everyone…
Snownova
The sanctity of marriage in the UK went out the window centuries ago when they split from the catholic church for the express purpose of the king getting divirced.