President Obama deferred to Defense Sec. Robert Gates, who he chose to inherit from President George W. Bush, on all things military because hey, Big B wasn’t exactly an expert on running two wars on the day he took office. But what’s this about Obama even letting Gates run the repeal of DADT?
In an assessment of Obama’s relationship with the U.S. armed services and Pentagon leaders, the NYT delves into Obama’s sometimes tense relationship with the men (and sometimes women) telling him what’s best for the country. Not surprisingly, there are a few digs, like people doubting the president’s management skillz!
A former adviser to the president, who like others insisted on anonymity in order to discuss the situation candidly, said that Mr. Obama’s relationship with the military was “troubled” and that he “doesn’t have a handle on it.” The relationship will be further tested by year’s end when Mr. Obama evaluates his Afghanistan strategy in advance of his July deadline to begin pulling out. As one administration official put it, “His commander in chief role is about to get tested again, and in a very dramatic way.”
But it’s Obama’s deference to his Pentagon head that should have you most concerned.
Perhaps his most important tutor has been Mr. Gates, the defense secretary appointed by Mr. Bush and the first kept on by a president of another party. They are an unlikely pair, a 49-year-old Harvard-trained lawyer turned community activist and a 66-year-old veteran of cold war spy intrigues and Republican administrations. But they are both known for unassuming discipline, and they bonded through weekly meetings and shared challenges.
Mr. Obama has relied on Mr. Gates as his ambassador to the military and deferred to him repeatedly. When Mr. Gates wanted to force out Gen. David D. McKiernan in May 2009 as commander in Afghanistan in favor of Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, Mr. Obama signed off. Likewise, cognizant of Bill Clinton’s ill-fated effort to end the ban on gay and lesbian soldiers, Mr. Obama let Mr. Gates set a slow pace in overturning the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, even though it has disappointed gay rights advocates.
Though times, they are a changin’. And while Obama has let Gates call the shots for some time (oh man was that an oversimplification of how military decisions are made), he’s been brushing up on brass tacks.
But as he grows in the job, Mr. Obama has shown more willingness to set aside Mr. Gates’s advice. When General McChrystal got in trouble in June for comments by him and his staff in Rolling Stone magazine, Mr. Gates favored reprimanding the commander. Mr. Obama decided instead to oust him and replace him with Gen. David H. Petraeus, who led the troop increase in Iraq.
[…] Mr. Obama has made a point of seeking his own information, scribbling questions in memo margins and scouring the Internet. At one meeting, he surprised the generals by citing a study of post-traumatic stress disorder among soldiers serving repeat tours.
Then he surprised everybody with a doodle of Bush bent over the Oval Office desk with Gates playing a power top.
Cam
So basically what I’m seeing here.
1. When it comes to the civil rights of American Citizens he is willing to let Gates control things, and even tried to prevent a DADT repeal from happening this year until Pelosi pushed it down his throat. Thought the WH was able to insert another road black into it before it was voted on.
2. However, when it comes to dealing with a General who insulted HIM PERSONALLY, he is perfectly happy to ignore Gates’s advice and make a complete leadership change that could have ramifications throuout the entire military and our deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I’m not saying that he was right or wrong to fire McCrystal, I just notice that he didn’t seem to care about any major ramifications of his decisions when he was firing somebody who had insulted him personally. I didn’t see the White House sending out surveys to find out how the soldiers would feel about the change, nor did I hear him talking about going slow because major changes could alter our effectiveness on the war on terror.
Just saying….
the crustybastard
The buck stops over there.
Martin Murray
F*** you Obama. If you have not fulfilled your promises to the LGBT community by the time of the next election, I will not be voting for you again . i won’t vote Republic*** either, but I’m sure some porn star or former child star will be running. I’ll vote for them instead!
Baxter
Obama’s problem is he’s a terrible leader. He delegates everything and never tells people what he wants. We saw this in the healthcare debate where he stood back and let Congress have free reign and we’re seeing it again now.
CJ
The last time I checked, Obama was the current president of the USA. It’s about time that he reminded himself of this. It’s not Gates – and it’s not Bush.
CJ
For those of you who voted for Obama, you got what you voted for: a person with no proven history of accomplishments. You hired the most inexperienced (of all candidates running) for the most difficult job in the world. Not only this, you hired him 2 months after we entered into a recession unlike any other. Since when do you put an inexperienced driver behind a school bus that’s racing towards a ditch? And no, I didn’t vote for McCain.
Bareback Hussein Osama
It is not my fault! Nothing is ever my fault! I appointed that scapegoat Gates to take the fall for me and keep me away from any accountability! Just be sure to re-elect me in 2012 so that I could feed you more promises about future promises! Don’t stop believing! YES WE CAN!
Did I mention it is not my fault? It is NOT! Can you blame Ken Mehlman instead?
Bill Perdue
Opposition to our agenda is bigotry.
Interference with repeal of DADT and DOMA and passage of ENDA are acts of bigotry.
CNN – : “In a letter sent to the House Armed Services Committee’s chairman on Friday, Robert Gates wrote he is “strongly opposed” to any changes to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” legislation before the military review is completed… The White House issued a statement Friday supporting Gates’ position… ”
A period of high and rising unemployment is when we need ENDA the most and Obama and the Democrats flat out refused to consider it in spite of the fact that 87% support an end to on the job discrimination.
(“Do you think there should or should NOT be Equal rights for gays and lesbians in terms of job opportunities” Yes 87% No 10% Unsure 3% – Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Dec. 3-4, 2008. N=1,006 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.7.)
Obama and the Democrats in Congress are cowards who cringe in fear before christian bigots, They’re functional bigots who refused to repeal Bill Clintons DOMA and DADT and enact ENDA in spite of the fact that they had supermajorities in both houses.
They’re going to lose in November because we’re going to sit it you and because they deserve to lose.
[img]http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o139/blueollie/blogphotos/democrats-spot-a-backbone1.jpg[/img]
pete
@Bill Perdue: I don’t agree with you on a lot of things, but on this issue, I totally agree.
reason
@Cam: Your dead wrong, his handling of the McCrystal incident gained him a lot of respect in the military leadership, as many generals stated that is how a general would have handled things. McCrystal respect was flagging with the troops and his yes-man attitude towards Karzai was enabling a corrupt loser to call all the shots. Appointing Gen. Patraeus, the true master of the strategy, showed how much he cared about the ramifications. Patraeus is also a general that is not afraid to adjust on the move, and doesn’t take crap from Karzai. Gates was the presidents perfect liaison to the military, giving the president instant credibility that the Clinton administration lacked throughout his entire presidency. Learning from the mistakes of the Clinton administration is a good thing, it got a health care bill passed and will get DADT repeal passed. Trying the same thing over and over again leads to the same failed results, but it seems to please people that are driven by emotions instead of the mind.
jason
I’m giving the Democrats 2 months to repeal DADT. If they don’t, they’re finished as a political force. I will not vote for them under any circumstances either in November or in upcoming elections.
Bareback Hussein Osama
@jason: It is all Gates’ fault! Don’t blame me!
Steve
Gates seems to believe that the military runs the country, and that the civilian President must do what he is told.
It is one thing to offer candid advice behind closed doors, but quite another to make public policy statements that are contrary to the Presidents clearly stated decisions.
The only appropriate response is for the President to appoint a new SecDef, after telling Gates that he is fired.
The SecDef has no is not part of the chain of command, so there will be no disruption of command, and no risk to national security.