
We’ve all seen that tall, masculine, muscled guy at our gay kickball league assumed to be an “aggressive top”, only to find out later from our gossipy teammate he’s actually a “big ol’ bottom”. Somehow, it becomes intriguing to us that he doesn’t fit the expected gender identification norms we usually associate with a certain sexual position, throwing us for a loop in our search for our next post-game conquest.
The fact that there isn’t a guaranteed code telling us where everyone…lands …in the bedroom keeps us on our toes, but it also poses a curious question. Why do certain guys identify the way that they do?
Gay men have been using sexual position as part of their identification for centuries. After all, unlike women, cis-men have the physical capabilities through their anatomy for both receptive insertion or external penetration, and you can’t always tell by looking at someone which they prefer (or can you???).
If you’re on the prowl and want a to guarantee your “needs” will be met, the necessity to identify sexual preference becomes essential. Hence, terms like “top”, “bottom”, and “versatile” (or “vers”) were born, becoming an all-too-important cultural norm in the gay world.

For a lot of guys, especially younger gays who have recently come out and entered the scene, this can feel like a lot of pressure. How are you supposed to know what you like, if you haven’t even been able to experiment yet?
Filling out your first Grindr profile can literally feel like filling out your application to be a gay man, including deciding right then and there what your gender identification is, and what your sexual position preferences are.

Luckily, in May of last year, the “dating” app finally recognized the limitations gay men have in categorizing themselves when creating their profile, and added in a new category called side, at least slightly lessening the obligation to fit neatly into one of it’s other buckets.
So what makes gay men identify as what? Is there any way to know?
A 2013 study based in China outlined in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found people often rely on gender stereotypes when trying to identify what sexual roles someone might have adopted in a same-sex relationship.
The question is…does the same thing apply when gay men are choosing their role and how they want to identify?
According to another 2015 study in China (why do they get to have all the fun??), the answer is, “yes.”
The study examined 509 gay men, and defined a “top” as someone who prefers the insertive role”, a “bottom” as “someone who prefers the receptive role”, and “versatile” as “someone who has no preferences regarding anal sex role.”
According to the results, gay men are choosing their sexual role identification more because of how they think they’re “supposed” to, based on how masculine or feminine they are, rather than even determining what their feelings are about the act of anal sex, and the levels of pleasure they receive from either role.
Although this makes us sad, it doesn’t come as a surprise. Society has a knack for wanting to box people in based on cultural expectations, verses allowing them to decide things for themselves, and gay culture is no different.
If a gay man leans on the more feminine side, he may feel that he needs to take on the more “womanly” role of receiving, instead of being the giver, reinforcing misogynistic stereotypes that go way back. On the other side of that coin, if a gay man is still wrestling with his own internalized homophobia, he may identify as a top just so as to not take on a role that makes him feel too feminine, which he may have fought against for years when being bullied as a kid on the playground. Again, more misogyny.
Other theories around how people choose their preference revolve less around gender, and more around dominance verses passivity. If you’re someone that views yourself as confident, aggressive, and in control, you may decide you’re more of a top. Conversely, if you’re more passive in your day-to-day life, and prefer to let others kind of take control and lead, you may enjoy the role of a bottom more. Once again, this theory has almost nothing to do with the levels of pleasure guys are receiving in the bedroom from the sexual acts themselves.
Of course, there are always variabilities that occur within these roles themselves. What about a “power bottom”, or a “passive top”? Are those types of variations available to those that realize sexuality isn’t so binary?
Author Gray Muranaga outlined a theory in 2019 he called the “The Tri-Top Theory”, which takes that concept of “nuance” even further.

He writes, “The roles we take on in our relationships are so much more than what we do in bed. Relationships are complicated and multifaceted. They often involve feelings, hard conversations, and romance. This leaves us with three basic roles in relationships: sexual, emotional, and romantic.”
According to his theory, you can be more of a top in one realm of relationship, while being vers or bottom in others. Makes sense.
Although, there may always be questions as to why gay men identify as they do, what’s clear is the pressure and limitations that come with having to pick our spot in the bedroom. Rather than feeling like people are going to expect something of us, wouldn’t it be great if we could just take time to figure out what we prefer, and even be allowed to evolve and change?
Now excuse us while we channel our inner top and demand Grindr add an “Undecided Position” category to their profile options.
Related:
Gay guys reveal why being in a “queerplatonic” relationship is better than a romantic one
What if you could have the perks of a romantic relationship, but without all the things that make them complicated?
Pietro D
# 1 Just do what is good for you!
#2 Just do what is good for you!
#3 Just do what is good for you!
abfab
Selfish.
dbmcvey
Is it really complicated at all?
Man About Town
I do appreciate Michael Henry’s video about sides, especially since they’re notably absent from the title.
DrJones
Does it really have to be so complicated? I think it’s just a combination of penis size, generally wanting to be more submissive or more dominant (but with gradations of course), the types of bodies/demeanors that turn you on, and ability to endure penetration. Generally, smaller dicked guys aren’t usually tops (but of course they can be, it’s just there is a lot of stigma around less than average size), those wanting to be more submissive tend to bottom (but of course there are “power” bottoms), and those that experience pain with insertion are not generally bottoms. Some guys also get weirded out by the clean out (which seems a cop out). Often younger/less experienced tend to be bottoms, but of course this can change or isn’t an absolute. Also those who have figured out they personally can achieve pleasure through penetration/prostate stimulation often do not want to do anything but bottom! Other guys really get off (literally) on “giving loads” or “breeding” and then are tops, or the opposite about receiving loads/being “bred.” It can also be fluid such that guys will bottom or top for certain guys or certain types, or may change roles over time.
dgsea06
Ooh, I don’t wanna be a stereotype! I just wanna be like everybody else!
Pleeze…
tjack47
It was evolution for me. I tried different things. Much of it was with whom I was. I had a sex therapist shame me calling me selfish for not bottoming for my partner. He was versatile. I wasn’t topping him either. It’s unfortunate that he didn’t have me medically cleared and evaluated. He would’ve understood how painful it became. I also was taking medication that caused ED. Psychology, I had so much pain from past SA injury that in the penetrative role, I always lost my erection anticipating his pain or causing pain. By a certain age, I was a side. I’d never heard this term. We weren’t sexually compatible, unfortunately. There were other major problems that led to a breakup after 12 years. I know I’m a side now. It’s so nice to have that pressure no more.
Invader7
I get it. All of the choices, evolving , the roles heaped on gay men , experiences, etc.. all combine to influence our personal sexual /emotional /relationship / interactions with other men. Some of us are versatile, bottoms , tops ,sides or a combo of each. Personally I’ve evolved into a top. And I’m fine with that. I say to each his own…Figure out what works for YOU ! And don’t begrudge other people’s choices..
Joshooeerr
This article is a giant load of horse excrement. It’s pretty astounding that in 2023 any writer on a gay website would assert that most of us still associate “gender identification norms” with sexual positions. Really?! Have you actually run that past any actual real-life gay guys in everyday relationships? It’s even worse that you frame the discussion in terms of phrases typically employed as slurs, such as “big ol’ bottom”. And never mind that they’re drenched in judgement. Then there’s the statement that “gay men have been using sexual position as part of their identification for centuries”. A dubious assumption given that sexual identity has we know it is very much a 20th/21st century thing. And anyone over the age of 50 will tell you that the tendency to “identify” as top or bottom is way more predominant in recent gay culture than it used to be (and massively more rigid and defining in the US than elsewhere). Then the real kicker – it seems this dimwitted ramble is prompted by a 2013 study from… China!!! That would be the China that barely acknowledges the existence of gay men (even more so a decade ago), mostly seeks to suppress gays, and, should they allow any “research”, would almost certainly ensure that the findings confirmed the authorities (almost certainly ignorant) assumptions. The observations that follow (assertive in the streets, passive between the sheets, etc) are the same old, same old stereotypes, which almost anyone with any actual lived experience knows to be a whole lot of hooey. All of which just leaves me wondering why Queerty feels the need to air such a limiting set of tired old tropes on the strength of nothing more than highly spurious “research” from one of the most repressive regimes in the world. Is there some kind of agenda here? Or is it just sheer stupidity?