When Barack Obama addresses the “formal and festive”-dressed attendees of the Human Rights Campaign’s thirteenth annual D.C. dinner, he’ll have the ears not just of the queers munching on hors d’oeuvres, and not just LGBT America, but on the entire nation: Not only is C-SPAN airing the dinner live beginning at 8pm, but the national news media will be there covering the president’s every word. (We would know: Too many of them applied for press credentials, which meant HRC cockblocked Queerty.) This means lots of Rachel Maddow soundbites, Jon Stewart mashups, and YouTube remixes. But most importantly, it will be Obama’s much needed platform to address the elephant in the room: Our fierce advocate has not only been snoozing, he’s been sticking our hands in warm water while we’re sleeping, too.
Tonight, the president has a chance to smooth over nearly a year’s worth of bad chemistry between the White House and the gays. (That is different from “the White House and Gay Inc.”) We fully expect the skilled orator to leave the stage with rounds of applause. What we do not expect is that he’ll make any concrete promises to us — leaving things as status quo, “committed” to our cause, but unwilling to do much for it.
But maybe he’ll surprise us?
Maybe he’ll actually step up to home plate not with a baseball bat, but a two-by-four aimed squarely at all the laws and politicians and “values” groups trying to keep us as a second-class?
It’s a leap, but if we were writing Obama’s speech, this is what we’d include.
Let us know there’s a firm plan to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. And that until it’s dead, you’ll stop applying it.
You say you want a legislative repeal of the 1993 law. But you’ve done visibly nothing to encourage lawmakers to kill this policy. Even when asked. You let your Defense Department talking heads continue giving excuses why even easing DADT is impossible right now. You must declare what you’ll do, legislatively, to kill DADT. You must call on Congress, and then commit to following up ad nauseam, to repeal the law. Let them know you’re willing to use political sanctions (read: vetoes) if they don’t. And until you can get enough lawmakers to see the light, declare you will issue an executive order halting investigations under DADT. We understand you’re low on political capital right now, and healthcare is your big to-do. But never has there been such a groundswell of support to repeal this law. Ride it, B.
Voice your support for marriage equality at the state level.
Your own home state of Illinois just introduced full marriage equality legislation, but you were silent. Just like you were when New Hampshire and Maine and Iowa declared gays must be allowed to marry. But those hard won victories now face challenges from religious-backed fights. In Maine, voters will have a chance next month to kill gay marriage rights; in Washington, they’ll have a chance to kill domestic partnership rights. Come out swinging for us in these states. Assure us you’ll lobby voters in these two states to do the right thing. We know it’s hard to do, given your public position on gay marriage (read: you think it’s only for men and women), but say something about state sovereignty and the will of lawmakers to make your point. These voters who elected you will listen to you again. But maybe not for long.
Call on Congress to hand you the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
Without discrimination protections, nearly every adult queer in this country faces some possibility of losing their job, or home, or social service, because they are not straight men and women. Declare this way of life to be incompatible with American values, and go on the record (name legislator’s names if you want!) with a commitment to lobby the hell of of lawmakers to pass a law that just makes sense. You want to be our fierce advocate? Then help keep our livelihoods and families safe from wanton disregard for equality.
The Matthew Shepard Act? Get ‘er done.
We’re almost there with this one. The House passed it. The Senate is en route (next week?!). And then it’ll arrive on your desk. Tell us you’ll sign it immediately. Make federal funds available for hate crimes investigations. Help create a federal statute that says it’s not OK to attack LGBTs, even when state laws don’t go that far. Send a message to conservatives that protecting queer Americans has nothing to do with speech or a “special class,” and everything to do with freedom and liberty.
Stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act. And help us kill it.
Nothing gets us more angry than seeing your Justice Department flacks defending discrimination. But that’s what you’ve let happen, bud, and it’s time for it to end. This law allows the federal government to legally treat gay Americans as second-class, even when states opt not to. Since 1996, Clinton and Bush have found ways to slap us across the face thanks to DOMA. Don’t be one of them. Let relationships and American families thrive. Promise us you’ll discontinue letting your legal experts denounce our “lifestyles” and commit to pressuring lawmakers to get behind the Respect for Marriage Act.
Lay out a plan to fight school bullying.
You’ve got two daughters of your own, Mr. President. Imagine if they were taunted in school? How that would make you feel? Untold tens of thousands of queer-identified (and sometimes not even) youth are the targets of school bullies, who make learning an impossible task. Vow to protect these children so there are no more Lawrence Kings or Carl Joseph Walker-Hoovers. Reach into those coffers and provide cash to so organizations like GLSEN can further their reach into school hallways, so Billys and Tanias and Sarahs and Maliks can focus on biology and algebra, not their plan to escape this world.
Invite a gay couple get married at the White House.
We know we’re pushing it with this one, but imagine: Washington D.C. Councilman David Catania just introduced a measure to legalize same-sex marriage in the nation’s capital. It’s expected to pass easily. Then Congress can choose to take a whack at it. Obama, tell lawmakers to leave it alone. And then, when the bill becomes law? We want to open up the White House to just one gay couple and, if you’re so willing, marry them. We cannot imagine any greater a symbolic or substantial move than the president of the United States backing up his commitment to be our fierce advocate than inviting us into his — America’s — home to celebrate a joyous union. Bonus for you, Obama? You could use it as a chance to reverse course, and come out in full support of marriage equality.
Stop trying to be our friend. And start trying to be our president.
You see like a good guy, Mr. President. But your platitudes, once welcome, are growing increasingly annoying. We don’t need you as our buddy. We need your as a human being who happens to be in a position of power. Continue attending fancy galas thrown by Gay Inc.; we’ll poke fun, but we understand it’s part of the game. Just stop relying on HRC to be your only source of communication with the gays — especially because we hear you understand Facebook and Twitter. You know what we want. You know what we need. So quit this bullshit practice of having us over the White House as some sort of crowd pleaser. Only until you help fulfill, or at least show a serious commitment to enacting all of the above will we feel at home in the White House. And then we’ll have that beer with you. Maybe even a Camel, too.
We’ve certainly missed a few promises Obama could make tonight. What else do you think the president should cram into his speech? Or should Obama’s speech be about something other than promises he may or may not keep?
Elaine
The President can “say” all he wants. Frankly, I want to see some action. I’m growing tired of the speeches.
InExile
One thing President Obama could mention is support for the Uniting American Families Act or support for including our families in comprehensive immigration reform. This would allow same sex bi-national couples living separated by the Atlantic Ocean to be reunited and those of us living exiled in foreign countries could move back home and resume our careers and share our lives with our friends and families again.
BrianZ
I’m with Elaine on this one: I’m a bit weary of the speachifying. Whoop-dee-fuckin do. Outside of the NobeLOL, it doesn’t really have much of an impact now does it?
Middle-east peace? Nope
End the wars? Nope
Disarm Iran? Nope
DADT, DOMA, ENDA? Nope, nope, nope
Health care? Nope
*yawn*
lloyd baltazar
UAFA. HELP GAYS PETITION THEIR LOVED ONES FROM OTHER COUNTRIES. STOP DISCRIMINATION AGAINST GAYS AND LESBIANS WHO WANT TO PETITION THEIR PARTNERS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.
Charles Merrill
Maybe he will say something like this, “Hope is where it’s at folks. Now let’s continue forward in this long fight to the mountain top for civil rights and listen to the cast from “Hair” sing “Let the Sunshine in”. Let’s all sing in unison.
Facing a dying nation of moving papaer fantasy
Listening for the new told lies
With supreme visions of lonely tunes
Singing our space songs on a spider web sitarLife is around you and in you
Answer from Timothy Leary deary
Let the sunshine
Let the sunshine in
The sunshine in
Let the sunshineLet the sunshine in
The sunshine in
Let the sunshine
Let the sunshine in
The sunshine in
schlukitz
@InExile and Lloyd Baltazar:
Co-sign!
And, Elaine, like BrianZ, I with you as well. As the old lady asked of McDonald’s about her meager hamburger…”Whar’s the beef?”
schlukitz
@Charles: ROTF and LMAO 😀
mary
he sure it turning out to be the opposite of what was expected of him http://typobounty.com/Funny/Obama_1.htm
http://typobounty.com/Funny/Obama_2.htm
these are so true
Andrew
He will announce an Executive Order suspending DADT.
Karen Bessey Pease
It’s unconscionable that any person be made to feel like a second-class citizen in this country. We have a lot of work to do, and I commend you for your efforts to keep the spotlight on the issue of inequality.
In my young adult novel, Grumble Bluff, I touch on the issues of bullying, childhood obesity, and losing a parent to a communicable disease. I know that this method is subtle, but I hope that in this way I can help readers discover the benefits of tolerance and acceptance. Best of luck to you as you fight for the right to be truly free in this country founded for just that purpose.
Respectfully,
Karen Bessey Pease
Author
http://www.karenbesseypease.com
Brian
Karen Bessey Pease said “I can help readers discover the benefits of tolerance and acceptance.”
We don’t need to be accepted or tolerated Karen, there is NOTHING WRONG WITH US. Write something of real value for LGBT – something about real “equality,” instead of treating us like defective people that need special considerations.
Sydney
He’s not going to do anything.
Because that’s what he does best.
B
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/10/national/w105349D04.DTL&tsp=1 has the latest info on it,
“President Barack Obama says he will end the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ military policy.” Also, “Obama said this country cannot afford to cut from the military’s ranks people with needed skills for fighting. He made the comments to thousands of gays and lesbians at a fundraising dinner Saturday night for the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay-rights group.”
schlukitz
No such luck, Andrew. He didn’t even give us a time frame.
schlukitz
President Barack Obama says he will end the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ military policy.
He also made the same promise to 300 million Americans when he ws campaigning for office a year ago. The question still remains…
when?
YellowRanger
That was overwhelmingly underwhelming.
schlukitz
Co-sign, Brian. Fuck the tolerance and acceptance.
Just give us the rights we are all entitled to as American taxpayers and citizens, and we will get out of everyone’s face.
Old Timer
Obama is the president, not a dictator. He can’t just wave a magic wand, children.
Bri
Nothing about Maine, the march, any sort of timeline. Uhh, ookay. All he did was give us history lessons and say the usual things.
…at least he’s speaking to/at us? Can’t say that about too many former presidents.
sal(the original)
omg the international news is talking bout this tnight,we got the spotlight on us,lets do something wise!!!
schlukitz
Obama is the president, not a dictator. He can’t just wave a magic wand, children.
Wrong again! Obviously, you need a primer in Federal Government 101.
The President can issue an executive order stopping the dismissals of LGBT people dead in it’s tracks.
You really should stop making such a fool of yourself. It’s embarrassing to all of us.
schlukitz
“I will end ‘don’t ask-don’t tell,'” Obama said at the annual dinner of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay civil rights advocacy group. Obama reaffirmed his commitment to end the ban, but did not give a timetable or the specifics that some activists have called for.
Obama also called on Congress to repeal the Defense Of Marriage Act, which limits how state, local and federal bodies can recognize partnerships and determine benefits. He also called for a law to extend benefits to domestic partners.
He expressed strong support for the Human Rights Campaign agenda — ending discrimination against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people — but stopped short of laying out a detailed plan for how to get there.
Richard Socarides, who advised President Bill Clinton’s administration on gay and lesbian policy, said Obama delivered “a strong speech in tone, although only vaguely reassuring in content.”
“The president and Nobel winner came and paid his respects, but tomorrow many will ask: What’s his plan, what’s his timetable?”
The gay community is somewhat split as to whether Obama should be expected to produce results right away.
The Human Rights Campaign, which invited Obama to speak at its dinner Saturday night, said it remains hopeful of seeing more action.
And we remain hopeful that Santa Claus will have lots of toys and goodies on his Christmas sleigh for us.
B
schlukitz wrote, “President Barack Obama says he will end the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ military policy. He also made the same promise to 300 million Americans when he ws campaigning for office a year ago. The question still remains…when?”
Earlier, under a different article, I posted a link and quote to some alleged statement by a person on Obama’s transition team that suggested 2010. Presumably the economy and health care are higher on the priority list.
Hopefully the military was told that this is going to happen at some point so they better get training material ready for the transition and figure out what the rules are going to be (e.g., how to handle complaints regarding harassment).
Old Timer
The President can issue an executive order stopping the dismissals of LGBT people dead in it’s tracks.
Like so many gay activists who are all enthusiasm and no study, you don’t seem to understand either the history of DADT or anything about how things actually work in Washington.
DADT is a federal law, not just a military policy. It was born in 1993, when Clinton tried to end the ban on gays. The Joint Chiefs, the Religious Right, and the chairmen of the two Armed Services committees joined together and steamrollered it. The gay lobby never knew what hit ’em, because like this weekend’s marchers they listened basically to themselves.
When Clinton tried to end the ban, the opponents threatened to insert legal language that would have wiped out what little progress had been made in the 1970s and 1980s. DADT is a compromise, and it passed with a veto-proof majority.
Yes, Obama could end enforcement. But if he did that without the support of the military, you can bet that the same thing would happen that did in ’93. Instead, Obama is lobbying Congress, and having the military work on implementation rules.
When repeal is proposed, there will be hearings in Congress, and senior military personnel will be testifying. If you somehow think that Congress is going to ignore that testimony during wartime, you’re crazy. So, like it or not, in light of both history and current circumstances, Obama cannot in the real world just wave a wand.
Well, he could wave the wand I suppose, but it would get waved right back very, very quickly. That is the reality of the situation, and that is why it will take more time. It’s not what you want to hear and it’s not what I like either, but it’s the way it is.
lloyd baltazar
Thanks for explaining that. I just understood how DADT works much much better.
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
That’s a good mix of truth and lie you’ve got going there. Let me correct a few things…
1). Yes, a veto-proof majority did vote for DADT in 1993. Unfortunately, you don’t mention that many Democrats who then voted for it have come out against it now. That kind of changes things, doesn’t it?
2). Its true that this is a federal law and that if Obama were to issue a stop-loss, the next president could rescind it. Once again, though, you don’t tell the entire truth. If Obama issues a stop-loss WHILE pushing for an end to DADT and makes it clear that this is the case, he will force Congress to take up the issue. As it stands even Harry Reid is asking Obama to just DO SOMETHING!
3). Which brings us to the last item that needs to be corrected. You claim that Obama is lobbying Congress, yet there is plenty of concrete evidence that the opposite is in fact true. Two Democratic members of the House have proposed bringing this to the floor as well as one Senator and each time the White House has pressured them to back down. I agree that Obama is lobbying Congress, just not in the direction you imply.
The one thing I agree with Obama about tonight is his call for us to pressure our leaders to pressure him. That is exactly what the protests outside the HRC cocktail party and the march tomorrow are doing.
Old Timer
@Orpheus, I want to respond but I gotta get moving tonight. Check back tomorrow.
schlukitz
Thank you, Orpheus, for sparing me from having to point out Old Timer’s glaring miscarriages of truth.
YellowRanger
Obama issuing a stop-loss would be like a paramedic arriving at the scene of a car crash and finding someone with a gushing head wound. Said paramedic would stop the bleeding, wrap the wound, give them some kind of pain killer and drive the victim to the nearest hospital where the doctors would deal with the actual wound.
Obama needs to immediately stop the bleeding while putting immense pressure on the doctors to permanently close up the wound.
schlukitz
Excellent analogy, YellowRanger.
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
I can’t wait. LOL
@Schlukitz
I aim to please. 😀
michael
Great analogy yellowranger. Heard the speech tonight and our bros. & sisters in the heartlands of America will think its great. But those that see things closer think it was a lot of flowery words without a plan of action. He is not our Dr. Martin Luther King, He is not a real friend, I don’t think the man is evil, but if he did not need our votes he would not have even been there tonight. He has no passion for our cause and we must find our real leaders and quit giving our hopes and power away. “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed”.
Old Timer
Yes, a veto-proof majority did vote for DADT in 1993. Unfortunately, you don’t mention that many Democrats who then voted for it have come out against it now. That kind of changes things, doesn’t it?
It certainly does help, but that does not make anything a slam-dunk. If Obama plays it wrong and the military brass testified that this would hurt during wartime, I think congressional support would evaporate.
If Obama issues a stop-loss WHILE pushing for an end to DADT and makes it clear that this is the case, he will force Congress to take up the issue. As it stands even Harry Reid is asking Obama to just DO SOMETHING!
Again, for Obama to issue the stop-loss without buy-in from the military and Congress would, in my view anyway, be shooting himself (and, more to the point us, in the foot).
Which brings us to the last item that needs to be corrected. You claim that Obama is lobbying Congress, yet there is plenty of concrete evidence that the opposite is in fact true.
I’m not making that claim, Obama is. And, for now, I trust his claim.
Two Democratic members of the House have proposed bringing this to the floor as well as one Senator and each time the White House has pressured them to back down. I agree that Obama is lobbying Congress, just not in the direction you imply.
I accept the White House’s view that they’re waiting for the right timing. Obama hasn’t even been in office for nine months.
Jim
Old Timer, you’re right. Barney Frank makes nearly identical points about Obama’s agenda; I have a hard time believing that a more politically-seasoned gay activist is among these commenters. My advice to you would be to avoid feeding the trolls: there are a handful of anti-Obama commenters here who thrive on shouting down anyone with an even slightly realistic understanding of American political discourse/process. They’ll never give ground. There’s almost an air of Bush nostalgia, in the way that people miss having a less sympathetic target for their anger. You represent the silent majority, however: you are angry about the rights you are being denied, but you are rational enough to realize Obama is not the man keeping them from you.
Jim
Might I add: those blindly anti-Obama commenters will go to war with anyone, thus driving up the clickthroughs for anti-Obama articles and encouraging Queerty editors to post similarly insubstantial coverage in the future.
Robert, NYC
So there we have it, NO time plan to repeal DADT which means…don’t expect anything before 2012 among other things, empty words just like his campaign. Not good enough. No wonder I stopped contributing to HRC and the Democratic National Committee, totally inept.
Don’t delude yourselves, he may support a ban on DOMA but he’ll NEVER come out in support of marriage equality because he values his career far too much, political suicide. There are none except Dennis Kucinich would would willingly stick their necks out.
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
The problem with your response is that it is filled with nothing but opinion and conjecture. There are no facts rebutting my facts at all. You “think”, “in my view”, and you “trust”. All of this shows that you are basing your – and my – civil rights on a hunch. Blind faith. I just can’t do that with Obama because he’s let us down and acted expressly against our interests too many times.
On the other hand, I’ve learned that trying to discuss politics with those who venture into the realm of “I believe” is useless so I think its best if you held to your faith and I’ll hold to my fact.
Old Timer
@Orpheus, please tell me what the Equality marchers — all 10,000 to 20,000 who filled part of the West Lawn of the Capitol — accomplished, versus what they might have accomplished if half of them had been in Maine and the other half in WA State, working on the marriage and civil unions ballot questions?
See, your crowd really isn’t very interested in getting anything done. What you’re about is the ILLUSION, and the drama. So you go to D.C., rent a microphone and say some words, and go home. You felt good. Gee. So impressive.
schlukitz
Old Timer, nobody owes you an answer or an explanation about anything. To put it succinctly, we don’t need no stinking badges!
This is still a free country and we can all do as we like…including getting on a bus and going to Wash. DC to march in a parade…and taking a shit in a porta-potty, if we so desire.
You don’t get to tell us, in this Democratic Republic, what we need to do, should do and must do.
If feel the need to exercise that kind of power, I would suggest that you invest in a one-way plane ticket to Moscow, where your kind would be more than welcomed in the Politburo, Comrade Old Timer.
Old Timer
@Schlukitz, who ever said I wanted that sort of power? It’s only my opinion. Deal with it. All 10,000 to 20,000 of you, about whom Barney Frank was exactly right.
schlukitz
Old Timer, no one here is obliged to deal with you at all!
And you know what they say about opinions, don’t you?
Opinions are like assholes. Everybody had one!
schlukitz
Correction: Had should be “has”
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
I guess if you lose a factual argument the next best thing to do is create a false dichotomy. There is nothing that says that many of those who are in D.C. right now aren’t also sending money and/or going to WA and ME to help out. Unless you’re privy to the inner details of each marcher’s schedule, I think you should probably stop demeaning them and their actions on that front.
Of course there’s also the question of who’s to say which method of activism works best. For many of us, we’ve found that the cocktail circuit activism that you and Barney Frank prefer has led to little more than making a few people much wealthier. As for the “friendly, quiet homo” activism that you’re pushing now, that also hasn’t worked at all. So where does that leave us?
Some of us think its time we took a page from the civil rights movement of the ’60s and became more vocal in our approach. It worked then, perhaps it will work now. Perhaps not, but we’ve tried your way for many years to no avail and now we’re trying something else. If it bothers you so much that you have to post lies, distortions and strawman arguments you can always try ex-gay therapy or something. The rest of us are going to keep on marching.
Old Timer
@Orpheus, you are badly misrepresenting what Barney Frank said. He advised direct contacts with legislators. I don’t attend cocktail parties. I’m not an HRC member. I am a contributor to the group that’s running ads in WA State on R-71, and have been on phone banks.
That’s real work. You basically had 10,000-20,000 people jerking off in Washington, D.C. for nothing. Those people should have been on telephones making calls in ME and WA. And instead of spending money to travel to D.C., tbey should have sent it to organizations fighting on those propositions.
But see, that’s REAL WORK, and real work is the furthest possible thing from your mind. You and your kind are all about the illusion and the drama. You are posers and pretenders. Nothing you’ve done for gay people will amount to anything, and if you keep it up, then it never will.
The accomplishments we’ve made in the real world have come largely through real work, not the kind of verbal masturbation we saw in Washington, D.C. from this bogus Equality event that virtually no one attended, and which represented no one by a few thousand kids who had nothing better to do that day.
In fact, I don’t think it even represented them. I don’t think most of the people who attended it really cared much about anything but a day in the sun to play pretend.
The Gay Numbers
By the way- proof that Old Timer and his type are basically Obamabots with talking point. If you will note the latest report out of how the White House views gay activists and its similarities to Old Timer:
http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2009/10/11/white-house-thinks-demonstrators-internet-left-fringe-who-need-to-take-off-the-pajamas/
I said it before, and I will say it again- Old Timer is just a troll with talking points. I was told not to waste my time with him and I will give others the same advice.
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
As I said before, I presented facts and you spewed lies, opinion and deception. Now you’re spitting venom at thousands of people who are doing their best, as they see it, to help enact change for the GLBT community in this country. What more is there to say, other than you’re obviously a bitter old man who resents youth (I noticed your derogatory comment about “kids who had nothing better to do that day).
Have you thought of perhaps seeking help for your anger and resentment? Barring that, maybe you could just focus on telling kids to get off your lawn since what you’re doing here amounts to much the same thing.
Old Timer
Now you’re spitting venom at thousands of people who are doing their best …
If that march is their best, then their best is a dismal failure. They accomplished nothing. I saw the tape of them on CNN, and they were an embarrassment. They had nothing to say. This wasn’t about what they wanted to do, it was about them posing as giving a shit. It’s all a pose.
There are real battles to be fought and real work to be done, but you and your crowd have no interest in any of it. You want a pat on the head? Not from me, bud. I’m a cranky old goat whose seen more than his share of bullshitters, and that’s exactly what this march was: a parade of bullshitters.
Old Timer
Interesting that “Gay Numbers” calls people “Obamabots.” He doesn’t know that I supported Clinton. I’d put money on it that a year ago he was fainting at Obama rallies. It’s one fashion to another with some people …
Orpheus_lost
@Old Timer
You’re the embarrassment, Old Timer, and you embarrass us all with your driveling tirades about things you just can’t understand. No one is looking for a pat on the head from you. In fact, we don’t even want your spite and resentfulness around us as we do the work to bring about the changes you and people like yourself never could.
That’s your problem. You resent the fact that my generation is making progress where you couldn’t. I won’t say we don’t want your generation to help us, because we do. But we don’t need your kind of sad, frustrated badgering and self-destruction in our fight. Its time for you to just crawl off the stage and wallow in your misery.