What does Davey Wavey want for Christmas this year? His foreskin! Warning: This video is less a holiday wish list than it is a war on circumcision. So what can Davey do now that he’s without a sheath? Well Santa could bring him one of these devices, though they’re more of a stocking stuffer than an under-the-tree present.
xmas agendas
Wherein Davey Wavey Asks Santa To Reverse His Childhood Mutilation
Help make sure LGBTQ+ stories are being told...
We can't rely on mainstream media to tell our stories. That's why we don't lock Queerty articles behind a paywall. Will you support our mission with a contribution today?
Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated
Devon
Davey Wavey, circumcision, and a mention of mutilation all in one post?
God help us all Queerty, you’ve opened Pandora’s box.
Soupy
Please Davey, ask Santa for some depth.
randy
I’m sorry, but life is too short. If you’re circumcised, just get over it and get on with your life.
jesus
i really hate this guy
will
sorry dabey wavey but genital mutilation is an Abrahamic thing… Jews and Gent… well Muslims. SO that makes it popular in pretty much most of the known world.
Qjersey
Arrgh, so tired of these dipshits equating circumcision with “mutilation.” As the procedure does not interfere with function or the ability to orgasm “modification” may be a better word.
divkid
man up / put on some clothes / or get a routine /or turn in your gay permit
divkid
the only dick i need to see fully covered is you
[meant with love]
Berto
Lets start small: get your brain back and then worry about foreskin.
divkid
Don’t give him the oxygen of publicity. “I’m not that happy with him having the oxygen of oxygen actually” [linda smith. comedian]
PatrickB
@will: Latin Americans and Europeans usually don’t do circumcision, and they are predominantly Christian.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Global_Map_of_Male_Circumcision_Prevalence_at_Country_Level.png
@Qjersey: “mutilate” can mean “to disfigure by damaging irreparably.” If a guy decides he wants his foreskin after his parents have cut it off, he can’t have it. That’s because his parents mutilated him!
Teluride
Well I must admit, it’s sometimes funny to watch a 4 year old in an adult, well, boyish body, but Babey Wavey is just a bit over the top for me.
That Bitch Téa Delgado
It’s not mutilation. It’s sculpted for greater beauty and enhanced pleasure.
Mack Robertson
Israel and the US? For better or worse, how about Islamic countries?
PatrickB
@That Bitch Téa Delgado: It’s totally fine someone wants to “sculpt” his body. His parents should leave that decision up to him!
alejandro
i find it hilarious that ppl stil thinks its okay to circumcise children. even if you dont like davey wavey, he does have a point. this should be the person’s decision when they are of consenting age.
Richie
I’m fine with being circumcised.
pete N sfo
Just b/c it’s a cultural norm in the US does not make it right.
Of course a parent shouldn’t have the right to permanently alter their child’s genitals… duh?!
It’s what you know… I find uncut dick far preferable & more attractive than cut. I tried to persuade my sister w/ her kid & he ended up having to get cut twice! He’s still not right, btw. lol
PatrickB
@pete N sfo: OMG. I hooked up with a guy with a botched circumcision once. It was so tragic. Although fitting, in a Darwinian sense.
mario
i’m so sick of this shit. i’m circumcised and i really don’t appreciate having my dick referred to as mutilated.
i think uncut dicks are disgusting. messy, stinky, fleshy little windsocks that look like they belong on a dog rather than a human being. they’re an instant turn-off. but do I go around professing that to the world? no, I shut up and keep it to myself. that’s something the outspoken dog-dong advocates of the world might wanna try, as opposed to constantly screaming and crying about mutilation.
PatrickB
@mario: Interestingly, that’s how human penises look, unless they’re mutilated. Washing it is as simple as pulling the foreskin back, and scrub-a-dub.
Jack
@mario: Er, you just did.
Sorry you got your dick hacked up without your consent, but try not to be so bitter about it! 😉
PatrickB
@mario: Last time I checked, human males came with foreskin, unless, of course, they are were mutilated by their loving parents.
jacknasty82
honestly who cares that much one way or the other. I’m cut, I probably wouldn’t have my son’s circumcised but I don’t really feel like I’ve lost out on anything not having a foreskin. the only reason I’d even consider it is that in some places circumcision is so commonplace that uncut guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.
Bubba in TX
Yes, technically circumcision is, by definition, “mutilation”. However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.
Everyone has a right to their opinion on this subject, but including that particular word in the headline is asking for trouble.
Sean
I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible. (And don’t hide behind “health” reasons; only a very small percentage of men see any health benefit from circumcision in any way, and that’s a decision that can easily be postponed until the kid has a say.)
I understand in an intellectual sense that infant circumcision is common in the US, and even some of the reasons it persists, but on a gut emotional level it seems absolutely insane that right after a baby boy is born, someone would decide “OK, so now this is how I want his cock to look.”
Cam
Get over it. Sheesh, an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.
Perhaps Davey needs to start thinking of something more immediate…like picking up the want ads.
jhon
@That Bitch Téa Delgado: because nothing ‘enhances pleasure’ like irreparably destroying thousands of important sexual nerve endings! also, if you’re such a fan of elective cosmetic surgery on infants in order to achieve ‘greater beauty’ than I suppose you support nose jobs for infants as well?
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
Please Davey, you gots a huge enough peen, stop your cryin!
JDE97
What a douche.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@mario:
but do I go around professing that to the world?
You just did.
no, I shut up and keep it to myself.
I wish you would.
dog-dong advocates
Your obsession with bestiality is disturbing.
Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.
@jacknasty82:
in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.
See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?
@Bubba in TX:
However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.
And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.
@Sean:
I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.
Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.
@Cam:
an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.
But his parents gave him the opportunity to decide for himself. That is the big deal.
Andrew B.
Fortunately circumcision rates are on the decline in the US, but male’s genitals deserve the same protection female genitals get in the US.
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/u-s-circumcision-rates-on-the-decline/
I would certainly like to have more of my touch sensitive nerves back but I will work with what I have, but I think it is important to advocate to stop this disgusting practice. Even if it were just a cosmetic change, it still should be banned for the same reason we don’t let parents put tattoos all over their infants.
As far as I am concerned on look of circumcision: it makes the penis look like some unnatural mushroom. This is a case where nature knows best.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@mario:
but do I go around professing that to the world?
You just did.
no, I shut up and keep it to myself.
I wish you would.
dog-dong advocates
Your obsession with animal genitalia is disturbing.
Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.
@jacknasty82:
in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.
See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?
@Bubba in TX:
However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.
And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.
@Sean:
I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.
Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.
@Cam:
an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.
But his parents gave him the opportunity to decide for himself. That is the big deal.
scott ny'er
@Cam: why at 22 would he get circumsized? just wondering.
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
@scott ny’er:Possibly becasue of something similar, I friend of mine gots snipped at 13. The foreskin was too tight once he hit puberty and his peen started growing he couldn’t get an erection without tremendous pain…………The healing process is pretty rough not something would advise doing simply for vanity reasons…….
pete
@PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS: As I cross my legs……
meego
@mario: Amen to that, brother!!! Totally with you on this one! Reminds me of this uncut guy I was about to go down on. The stink almost made me sick! Beuark!
divkid
@scott ny’er: i knew a guy who got cut at 36yrs. he had barely been able, if at all, to retract his foreskin, so painfully tight was it. he had NEVER EVER seen his own helmut in its full glory. the hygene implications dont bare thinking about: we must be talking cheese prodution on an industrial scale!
Cam
@scott ny’er:
I think it was sort of a split second decision after the last of numerous “Zipper Incidents”.
Eric
I have 2 friends that got circumsized as adults-one gay that didn’t like how it looked and one straight whose wife wouldn’t marry him until he did.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@mario:
but do I go around professing that to the world?
You just did.
no, I shut up and keep it to myself.
I wish you would.
dog-dong advocates
Your obsession with animal genitalia is disturbing.
Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@jacknasty82:
in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.
See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@Bubba in TX:
However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.
And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
What the fuck is going on with all the moderating of comments here? It’s getting to the point that just responding more than once, is considered spam. Bullshit.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@Sean:
I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.
Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.
PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
@Mr. Enemabag Jones: Queerts gots the most bizzare moderating criteria. You can post cock, prick, dick, schlong, tool, junk, and any other word you can conjure up for your three piece set. But if ya try to post the forbidden word p e n i s you get autoflagged……….go figger
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS:
Tell me about it! Nothing more frustrating than getting cock blocked on a blog 8^(
jonny
circumcision is NOT mutilation in the sense that we now use the word mutilation. I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse. Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child, in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds… Anything to prevent this, no matter how small is welcomed.
To claim it is unnatural to circumcise is a boat full of shite. What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation? Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?
The choice is the parents to make.
Michael C
I assume you mean the overbite?
BenB
When I have kids, I’m gonna have their pinkies cut off. My religion, BenBarianism, says that’s what Yahweh wants, and having less fingers to wash is obviously more hygienic. Plus, lots of people are into amputees. And when it’s done properly, it won’t endanger the child, it’ll just mean having an excruciating wound for a while.
Come on people. We’re surely evolved beyond this point by now. I’m all about people having the choice to cut parts of themselves off if they want to, but not being able to choose is incredibly unfair. Bodily integrity is a human right.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@jonny:
I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse.
Jonny, go to google images, and type in the word circumstraint. Look at those images, and tell me that is not abuse.
Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child,
There is a picture. A picture of a newborn male. A newborn male who’s parents consented to a circumcision. The doctor used a clamp. It is applied to the foreskin, tightened, and it squeezes off the foreskin. This newborns foreskin became infected. His parents raised concerns with the doctor, and their concerns were dismissed. The boy’s penis became gangrenous. The image of what doctors in an ER had to do to that newborn to save his body, and life are so horrifying, and gruesome, that even after seeing it once, I still can’t get that image out of my mind. What that boy will have to go through with operations, disfigurement, and pain for the rest of his life are staggering.
Complications happen daily with newborn circumcision, and they are swept under the rug, daily.
I will not post that picture here. But I will tell you, jonny, circumcisions do endanger children. Hundreds every year. And we never hear about it. Maybe because they’re not girls.
in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds
So does washing, and condoms.
What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation?
Hair grows back, even after a bad haircut.
Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?
Glasses, and contacts don’t alter the body.
The choice is the parents to make.
Just as it’s your choice to be freely, and openly gay, it’s a man’s choice to decided what will happen with his penis.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@jonny:
I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse.
Jonny, go to google images, and type in the word circumstraint. Look at those images, and tell me that is not abuse.
Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child,
There is a picture. A picture of a newborn male. A newborn male who’s parents consented to a circumcision. The doctor used a clamp. It is applied to the foreskin, tightened, and it squeezes off the foreskin. This newborns foreskin became infected. His parents raised concerns with the doctor, and their concerns were dismissed. The boy’s member became gangrenous. The image of what doctors in an ER had to do to that newborn to save his body, and life are so horrifying, and gruesome, that even after seeing it once, I still can’t get that image out of my mind. What that boy will have to go through with operations, disfigurement, and pain for the rest of his life are staggering.
Complications happen daily with newborn circumcision, and they are swept under the rug, daily.
I will not post that picture here. But I will tell you, jonny, circumcisions do endanger children. Hundreds every year. And we never hear about it. Maybe because they’re not girls.
in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds
So does washing, and condoms.
What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation?
Hair grows back, even after a bad haircut.
Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?
Glasses, and contacts don’t alter the body.
The choice is the parents to make.
Just as it’s your choice to be freely, and openly gay, it’s a man’s choice to decided what will happen with his penis.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
Whoever is in charge of posting reader’s comments here on Queerty–FUCK YOU AND YOUR CENSORSHIP.
randy
@Mr. Enemabag Jones: You seem to be having problems….what is it you are trying to post that they are not letting you?
JP
This is just so stupid. I’m circumcised–certainly not what I’d consider “mutilated”, my pole looks pretty good to me and seemingly anyone else who’s been down there–but I have no highly generalized animus towards any other poles, either way. I’ve seen some incredibly ugly cut poles and just as many incredibly ugly uncut poles.
With due respect to passionate (sometimes fanatic) opinions on both sides, this topic seriously needs a rest. Get over it.
Thank you
Well I would like to personally thank my parents for mutilating, cutting, hatching, butchering, circumcising or whatever you want to call it.
PatrickB
@jonny:
If you don’t
1) want to pull back your foreskin to clean it,
2) want to get teased in the locker room (if that isn’t the case already for being gay) or
3) like how foreskin looks
then get circumsized! It your choice. Yay freedom! Yay America!
Just don’t do it to anyone else without his consent.
Mr. Enemabag Jones
@randy:
what is it you are trying to post that they are not letting you?
I have no idea! I dropped the F-bomb, and it went right past the spam filters. Yet I post a reply to another commentator, and it gets caught up in moderation. Five comments so far that contain no obscenities, no vulgarities, and no cursing, have been blocked. Yet I shout out a giant f-you, and there it is, for all to see.
Jeffree
@Mr. E-bag Jones:
Happens all the time to me too. Comments take about a week to be posted after you get modulated (!), if ever. None of my comments that got sidelined went against T.O:S. but they still vanished…
— — — —
Doesn’t Wavey Diva have more important or interesting items for his Santa Bring-Me list? yeesh, he’s self-absorbed!
David
Right on, Davey Wavey!
Since the angry cut men on here are freely lashing out, let me say that cut is ugly. All the defensiveness is in recognition of this reality. I guess if you’ve been forced to be circumcised, you can either work to end it or defend it. Davey is on the right path.
Queer Supremacist
Every man I’ve ever known (in the Biblical sense) has just loved my cut cock. And I love not having to constantly clean up smegma. Uncut cocks are disgusting, especially those on which the foreskin cannot be lowered to reveal the head. You dog-dong advocates are basically equivocating moils to Lorena Bobbitt. That alone is enough reason to discredit the anti-circumcision propaganda.
Soupy
Davey is a vapid, shallow goof. His opinion on any subject would generally force me into choosing the opposite.
Ashton C
I love my uncut dick and couldnt even begin to imagine having my skin chopped off. why not chop off earlobes?
Soupy
Or put holes in them? How crazy is that?
Hugh7
@ #61 Queer supremacist: “You dog-dong advocates are basically equivocating moils to Lorena Bobbitt.” With an effort I translated that to “..equating mohels…”, and no, we’re not. We’re equating doctors (>97%) and mohelim (<3%) to people cutting healthy, functional (erogenous) non-renewable parts off others' genitals without consent or justification.
(If you hate "those on which the foreskin cannot be lowered to reveal the head," you should try a cut one with a skin-bridge. And intact men don't "constantly" have to clean up smegma. A few seconds a day, easy – and fun!)
@Soupy #62: Then you'd sometimes be forced into taking some pretty stupid positions.
#64: Piercings are reversible, circumcision is not.