We first heard rumblings about an Indiana state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage this time last year when two House lawmakers introduced the bill. But now, in the State Senate, it just passed through the Judiciary Committee in a 6-4 party line vote; it’s expected to pass a full Senate vote, but faces stronger opposition in the House. Gay marriage is already illegal in Indiana, with state law barring it. But this bill applies to both marriage and civil unions, and would amend the state’s highest doctrine and, theoretically, block those activist judges who want to overturn the ban. Relays WIBC: “The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 6-4 along party lines to recommend the amendment to the full Senate, which could vote on it next week. The House and Senate approved a similar amendment in 2006. But the amendment stalled on its required second trip through the legislature in 2007, when a House committee deadlocked on the proposal. The amendment has not received a hearing in the House since. Two versions of the amendment have been filed this year in the House, including one co-sponsored by Democratic Reps. Steven Stemler of Jeffersonville and Ron Herrell of Kokomo. There’s been no indication the resolution will receive a hearing. Republicans on the panel remained silent throughout the two-hour hearing before voiting for the amendment. Democrats challenged witnesses to distinguish the ban from laws once on the books in Indiana and other states against interracial marriage.”
retry
jimmy
Our House of Representatives is Democrat led and Speaker Patrick Bauer won’t let this see the light of day.
craigers
Jimmy is spot on. Nothing to worry about here in Indiana. Republicans have gotten this far many times. As long as Patrick Bauer is speaker of the house this will not come up for a vote. The reason it went so far before was the Republicans took over the house for a brief time and passed it. When the Democrats took the house back they stopped it.
The only issue is that the Democrats always have a very limited hold on the house. Usually a few seats at most, sometimes only one. We just need to keep making sure Democrats control the house.
Here in Indiana a proposed amendment has to pass two consecutive, separate, legislative sessions and then it still has to go to the people for a vote (take that California). It is strongly rumored that Republican Governor Mitch Daniels opposes this amendment, and he controls his party in this state with an iron fist, so I do not think he would allow this to go too far even if it got by the house.
Luke
We can only hope to get Mitch to vocally oppose the amendment. I don’t think he will unless he really isn’t looking to get elected again.
And he doesn’t rule with as much of an iron fist as some think – there are plenty of unhappy with Mitch Republicans in the state.
bystander
Mitch ’12
FranOber
Recently visited an Indiana hormone optimization doctor, and was
amazed by the level of quality care I received. Hormone
Optimization is so under the radar and should be practiced more by regular physicians.