And by "America," we mean the readers of People magazine. (Though that's the same magazine that keeps naming Hugh Jackman the sexiest man alive, so they must be doing something right.) Meanwhile, first First Lady Martha Washington scored a resounding "80% hot" score, but only because People totally substituted the image we all associate with her.
“The notion that there could be ‘legal consequences’ for airing two men kissing on network TV in 2009 is stunning” (7)
· FakeName says: I weep for what Logo could have been were it not for the greedheads at Viacom... »
Twilight Taylor Lautner Will Neither Confirm Nor Deny He’s a Big Homo (41)
· Same Crap says: “I think most men are bisexual in orientation.” I don’t think this... »
· Bill says: Let us not forget that is is the STRAIGHT media that is really the maniaclly obsessed... »
How Janet Jenkins Scored Custody of Her Non-Biological Daughter (28)
· Alexa says: Wow. There are some seriously twisted people in this thread. Stop reading things into my... »
Add Davey Wavey to the ‘Censored Sex Acts’ List! (15)
· Same Crap says: I only read the Davey posts because of the gossip about him. »
SHOCK: John Ensign + Mark Sanford’s Religious ‘Family’ Is Backing Uganda’s Gay Hate (17)
· Same Crap says: “These sub human filthy animals deserve to lose every dime of that... »
· Steve Leong says: BOTTOM LINE FOR THOSE WHO DO HATRED AND HARM ONTO OTHERS CREATED DIFFERENTLY FROM... »
California’s Vallejo Mayor Osby Davis Sorry Saying Gays Are Sinners is Offensive (15)
· Chitown Kev says: @Naghaneau Maybe, but aligning the curse of Ham with black people has a very, very... »
Fine, We Admit It: Bebe Zahara Benet Is The Shit (17)
· Michael Letterman says: Fags seem to have a need to paint all straight men as gay. What’s more... »
Forget the Blowjob: Adam Lambert’s Album Is Good And Selling Gangbusters (28)
· terrwill says: Adam Lambert = My new hero……… …This guy doesn’t give a... »
I think, realistically, if cleopatra walked in and asked for a shag more than 48% of america would say yes. Hell, I'd say yes, if not just for bragging rights.
OK, two things:
1) You've spent so much time rallying against the idea that we can even call someone in the 18th cent. gay, and now you're going to call a 16th and 17th cent. man with a wife and kids a homosexual? Bisexual if you're gonna put our labels on (Hathaway certainly wasn't the only woman he had), but even that seems tacky.
2) Oh, lord I realize it's the sexiest portrait of him in contention, but almost most serious scholars reject the idea that the Cobbe portrait is authentic or even meant to be Shakespeare (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03.....mp;st=cse)
What? No "Who wore it best?" competition?