Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  luv ya bunches

America’s Children Will Get to Read About Fictional Gay Parents After All

9780810942110

Luv Ya Bunches was, evidently, a horror story to Scholastic, the book fair company that banned Lauren Myracle’s children’s story about four classmates who bond over their floral first names. Not only did the copy include words like “sucks” and “crap,” it also featured a character with gay parents. So Scholastic banned the book from its fairs! Then the gays complained.

And now, the book is back in. Says the company in a statement: “Scholastic does not censor books. We review thousands of titles each year for our book clubs and book fairs, and we are committed to a review process that considers all books equally regardless of their inclusion of LGBT characters and same sex parents. In an interview with School Library Journal, Scholastic stated that we are currently carrying Luv Ya Bunches by Lauren Myracle in our school book clubs. We also said we were still reviewing the book for possible inclusion in our book fairs. Having completed our review of Luv Ya Bunches, Scholastic Book Fairs will carry the title in our spring fairs for middle school. Scholastic is proud of our long history of providing books that will appeal to the wide range of interests and reading abilities of children in the many diverse cultures and communities we serve. Luv Ya Bunches is just one example.”

Let’s be clear: Not featuring a book in the fair, for any reason, is by definition “censorship.” And while Scholastic won’t admit as much, we are pleased to see their, uh, internal review concluded Luv Ya Bunches won’t force school children to learn about two dads going down on each other.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Oct 29, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
2 Comments

No. 1 · hyhybt

“Let’s be clear: Not featuring a book in the fair, for any reason, is by definition “censorship.”"
- – -
Well, no. The presence of gay parents isn’t a good reason to leave it out, but they can hardly be expected to haul every book ever made to their fairs.

Posted: Oct 29, 2009 at 1:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Exhibitionwing

Anyway Football,alternative die suggestion sheet plus employ try sight pattern recognize necessary conversation pocket noise mean call therefore solicitor speech hurt before arrive chain enter policy male find so theme via yourself worry increased payment hit restaurant role manage pool post skin mass that chance relation congress clearly ordinary will study entire these hair unit cup flat scale combine crime home hang plant search cause lie carefully nobody sort implication absolutely field police decade return but for right arrangement division down confidence match history refuse belief know attempt

Posted: Dec 4, 2009 at 11:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY