
—Exodus International’s Alan Chambers responding after that little Hopeline incident with Clear Channel [via]
As usual they miss the point. I don’t believe the message here is not that any viewpoint of sexuality is less valid. The message is that not all viewpoints – on any subject – are entitled to association with and the market share/leverage of Clear Channel. Clear Channel, like McAllister, has freedom of association.
I would hope it is also a learning moment. The next time this “Christian” organization boycotts or disassociates themselves with someone or something they see as distasteful or damaging to their viewpoint, maybe they’ll remember the feeling — doubtful, but maybe.
· Flag
“While Exodus is the group being marginalized in this case, it’s the freedom to express a traditional viewpoint of sexuality that’s really at stake,”
—
Quick Comparison
“While the Klan is the group being marginalize, it’s the freedom to express a traditional viewpoint of race relations thats really at stake.”
Hmm, yeah, both coments sound like bigots crying that somebody isn’t letting them push their bigotry.