Idaho To Consider Gay Discrimination Bill?
Shocker!
 

id-idahogreetings-1.jpg
Can you believe it?! Idaho - home to toilet trolling Senator Larry Craig - may soon debate a gay inclusive non-discrimination bill. State representative Nicole LeFavour celebrated the legislative move with a very special blog post.

On this day when we celebrate Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the Senate State Affairs Committee voted to print the first piece of legislation to mention sexual orientation, and to propose ending centuries of discrimination against gays and lesbians in employment, housing, education and public accommodation.

Leslie Goddard, director of the Human Rights Commission beautifully presented the bill after an introduction by Senator Tim Corder, a major sponsor of the legislation.

Nothing, except giving thanks to those who vote well, is more important than dedicating ourselves to having positive, gentle interactions with legislators who are still on the road to understanding these issues and voting as we would wish.

The potential bill will rewrite 1968's Human Rights Act and would prohibit businesses with five or more employees from discriminating based on sexual orientation. Religious organizations, however, would not have to abide by the law.

We simply can't wait to hear how Craig votes - not that we're expecting much…

Comments (6)

No. 1 · thatguyfromboston

Craig won't vote, he can't vote. He's not a member of the Idaho state senate. He's the U.S. Senator from Idaha.

Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 12:29 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · thatguyfromboston

oopsie, I meant idaho, not ha. hehe.

Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 12:35 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Mark Walsh

I don't think that there are many businesses with over 5 employees in Idaho. There aren't many people. Nonetheless, this should be sort of interesting. %60 of the population is Mormon. The issue keeps being thrown around in their Church. My brother lives there and he has a number of practicing gay Mormon friends. There are Gay people around. It probably doesn't affect that many people, but is a step in the right direction.

Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 3:02 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Elaygee

Idahahaha would suit it better

Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 3:36 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 5 · ProfessorVP

There is no question how Larry would vote if he were so able. Getting busted, I think, was actually an empowering experience for him; it made him ballsier. He has been ridiculed beyond measure to the point where he had to go on national TV to say he went to the bathroom "for bathroom's sake." I'm sure Larry's blood pressure is lower than, say, that of Lindsey Graham or Mitch McConnell.

Posted: Jan 22, 2008 at 8:19 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 6 · fabianlander

why do they deprive the right of others to choose their own live.if this act destruct an harmony atmosphere for gay and bring them a suspending future,i will be always opponent to it.you can conmunicate with hot gay on gaysinglehunt.com.they are vigorious and optimistic and alawys surprised you

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:47 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

Scroll Posts
 


Queerty Team

Editor
Japhy Grant

Editorial Director
David Hauslaib

Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

Our Network

Jossip The gossip's gossip sheet

Mollygood Splaying celebrities from A- to D-list

Stereohyped Once you blog black, you never go back

About

Advertise

Privacy

RSS

 
Copyright 2008 Jossip Initiatives LLC