Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  blockades

Navy Still Upholding Unconstitutional DADT Law, Turning Away Gay Recruits

Omar Lopez, a 29-year-old five-year Navy veteran honorably discharged in 2006 for “homosexual admission,” tried re-enlisting at an Austin recruitment office following Judge Virginia Phillips striking down Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. He was turned away. The recruitment officers had no knowledge of the ruling — which could be true, as the Pentagon has issued no guidance regarding DADT investigations, recruitment, or whether it’s safe for gay soldiers to come out.

  • 7 Comments
    • No. 1 · AlanInS.L.UT

      If they had no knowledge of the ruling, why the hell does this matter?

      Oct 14, 2010 at 11:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 2 · Cam

      They are in contempt of a Federal court order.

      Oct 14, 2010 at 12:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 3 · the crustybastard

      @AlanInS.L.UT:

      I dunno. Maybe it matters because the military is ignoring a fucking federal court order? Which means they’re in contempt of court? and ignoring the rule of law?

      What do you suppose happens when the the military no longer feels confined by the rule of law? (Show your work.)

      Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 4 · Fitz · Member · 1653 comments

      In the history of the world, it has happened that the Military has refused the authority of the other branches of a government— it is usually very very bad news when that happens.

      Oct 14, 2010 at 12:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 5 · jon

      He should sue them. Not to mention put them in regular jail. Make them an example like they do to us. Sometimes it is an us and a them thing.

      Oct 14, 2010 at 1:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 6 · AlanInS.L.UT

      All this article says is that he was turned away because the person accepting the applications was not informed of the ruling. It doesn’t say he was instructed to turn them away, nor does it say that the recruitment officer was acting on behalf of the entire Navy. Since it is just one person who didn’t know of the ruling yet (since it was the same day for hell sakes) doesn’t mean that they did it to be spiteful towards the gay community. If this continues to happen past a day or two, then I’d say flip out on the Navy. Otherwise, to me it is a case of not being informed and bad timing.

      I swear to god we (the LGBT community) like to pounce on anything that gets a little attention for our community, no matter how far reaching the attempts are. It almost makes me embarrassed to be part of this community.

      Oct 14, 2010 at 4:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 7 · damon459 · Member · 181 comments

      I’m sorry but even if they finally totally remove DADT there is no way in hell I would serve this country in a war. Some scars are just to deep. Lets the breeders go off an die in senseless wars.

      Oct 15, 2010 at 2:32 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag

    Add your Comment




    It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


    Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.