The New Hampshire House voted Thursday to allow gay marriage. The bill now goes to the Senate and if it passes there, to Governor John Lynch's office. Lynch, a Democrat, says he opposes the bill, but has not indicated whether he will veto it or not. The bill narrowly passed, with a vote of 186-179. 12 House Republicans voted for it, while 26 Democrats opposed it.
"Two years ago, the Legislature approved, and Lynch signed, civil unions for gays, which provide all the rights of marriage, except in name.
Civil unions are not marriage, said Rep. David Pierce, D-Etna. The law should respect and support his life with his partner and their two daughters.
"When my children grow up to be old enough to know what discrimination is, they should not have to learn they were the objects of it," he said.
He said gays should be allowed to marry, just as women won the right to vote and people of different races the right to marry.
"It is separate but equal all over again. Would you volunteer to ride at the back of the bus? Would you volunteer to give up your marriage license for a civil union license?" said Pierce.
Brookline Democratic Rep. Melanie Levesque, who is black and married to a white man, said her marriage was still a crime in Virginia in the mid-1960s.
"We have had a long history of challenging conventional wisdom — the Earth is flat, people from different continents should not marry, people who are the same should not marry," she said.
Republicans who voted against the bill said gay marriage defies nature and could harm children.
Rep. John Cebrowski, of Bedford, said, "You cannot make two similar things into something they were never meant to be." Rep. Laura Gandia, of Litchfield, called it "the most radical redefinition of marriage that can be imposed."
What Queerty Is Thankful For This Year (4)
· GimmeABreak says: I’m thankful for the wonderful egg donor and gestational surrogate who... »
· Chris says: No god, that’s right, but why not ignore that point. People can thank a... »
Adam Lambert’s Homogayness Not Too Homogay for CBS (Homogay.) (26)
· romeo says: @ Terrwill: good point. Queerty is running too many Adam threads. Need to consolidate.... »
· terrwill says: GMA: > Gay dude who performs and does nothing illegal: BAN him > Chris Brown:... »
Rich Gays Pay $3.3M More in ‘Death Taxes’ … Worst Lady Gaga Rumor Not About Penis (12)
· romeo says: I love this thread! LOL I guess I’m a loser gay, but not from lack of trying. »
ABC’s Ridiculous Policy to Ban ‘Controversial’ Adam Lambert From Daytime Airwaves (103)
· romeo says: BTW: as of last night, Adam was #3 on iTunes album sales chart. LOL »
· romeo says: Actually, guys, it looks like it’s turning into a boon for his album sales.... »
Virginia + Maryland’s Governors Are Catholic. And They’re Furious With the Church’s Threats (27)
· terrwill says: Sarah Allen: Sarah, Sarah, Sarah, I was going to refrain from using this word on... »
Smiling Bigot Mike Huckabee Worries Gay Marriage Will Destroy Kids’ Minds (22)
· 1EqualityUSA says: Dear WillBFair, http://www.loc.gov/exhibi ts/treasures/images/vc84. jpg »
Will Uganda’s President Have to Answer for His Gay Hate Bill? … Taylor Lautner’s BF?! (9)
· terrwill says: PS to the BOQB who ALWAYS need to bitch about SOMETHING on EVERY thread the Queerty... »
Good news, but last night I read somewhere that he has gone on the record that he will veto the bill when it comes to his desk.
@Erick: That was Vermont Doll…
@Frenchy:
Yep, just checked. I wasnt sure. Still, great news.
@Erick: Sure is.
perhaps we in california should focus on new england- i feel like the battle is lost on the west coast. we've got to pressure the obstructionist governors.
Contact the New Hampshire Senate NOW and encourage them to vote for gay marriage. We need every vote we can get.
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.u.....embers.asp
@rogue dandelion: Californians need to focus on California. The governor of Vermont doesn't care what people in California think about him. Gay marriage will be on the 2010 California ballot whether we like it or not. The California Secretary of State has already cleared the group Yes on Equality to start collecting signatures on a petition for a ballot measure.
What are John Lynch's reasons for opposing the bill?
@Rob:
Couldn't agree more Rob. The battle is not lost in California, it's just begun. (I believe that CA Supremes will overturn Prop 8 because to let it stand means there are no "unaleinable" rights in California — no rights that cannot be taken by a 50.00000001% vote. But if it is upheld the issue will come back on the ballot in 19 months.)