Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  PREVIOUSLY ON...

Porn Model Johnny Walsh Cast In Upcoming Reality Series “Marriage Bootcamp”

In the grand tradition of gay porn models of yesteryear appearing on the reality junk television shows of today, former Straight Guys For Gay Eyes (NSFW) model Johnny Walsh has been cast as himself on WE’s Marriage Boot Camp.

Walsh, now going by his legal name Shaun, appeared in two scenes at the “gay for pay” studio in 2009, once in a solo scene and once having bareback sex with a woman. Apparently there are gay men who purchase memberships to gay porn websites to watch straight men have sex with straight women, which is why this dude is hailed as having done “gay porn” without actually ever having had sex with a man on camera. Stay with us here.

This story is not to be confused with that of Dustin Zito, the Real World housemate who appeared in actual gay porn and then moved on to a marriage counseling show—at least he had the decency to engage in hardcore scenes with other men.

If you’re a gay man interested in watching Johnny Walsh have sex with a woman “for gay eyes” (???), head on over to Gay Daily Hot, where the director of his hardcore scene is also throwing shade at Jason’s acting skillz.

johnny-walsh-gay-porn

By:           Matthew Tharrett
On:           Feb 5, 2014
Tagged: , , , , ,

  • 23 Comments
    • oilburner
      oilburner

      He’s hot in a creepy and gross sorta way nonetheless I’d totally have sex with him if he let me.

      Feb 5, 2014 at 6:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Vegas Tearoom
      Vegas Tearoom

      oilburner, look into those creepy eyes and he could be Howard Wolowiyz’ little porny brother.

      Feb 5, 2014 at 6:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • balehead
      balehead

      Hawt Trash….

      Feb 5, 2014 at 7:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • kurt_t
      kurt_t

      @oilburner, your comments reveal a deplorable absence of judgement, morals and self respect. Me too.

      Feb 5, 2014 at 7:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jackhoffsky
      Jackhoffsky

      Is this… entertainment?

      I felt my IQ dropping just during the trailer.

      Feb 5, 2014 at 8:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Scribe38
      Scribe38

      @oilburner: those eyes say I am going to chop you up into pieces and drop you in a river. No thanks I’m good.

      Feb 5, 2014 at 9:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • stranded
      stranded

      I clicked the link, not bad. That pic isn’t the best. He’s like a really buff Dave Grohl

      Feb 5, 2014 at 10:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kenover
      Kenover

      Shaun isn’t aging well. He also seems to be psychotic.

      Feb 6, 2014 at 3:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      @Vegas Tearoom:

      OMG you’re right, he DOES look like Howard from “The Big Bang Theory”! LOL!!!

      Feb 6, 2014 at 7:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jimbryant
      jimbryant

      Gay men like to watch heterosexually-acting men in the act of sex because it’s a form of admiration of the latter’s virility. Gay men might have sperm but their virility will never be tested. There is thus a lot of envy there.

      Feb 6, 2014 at 7:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • litper
      litper

      and right wing troll is here again

      Feb 6, 2014 at 12:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • litper
      litper

      gays who watch such kind of “gay porn” are 60 year old closeted anti-gay republicans

      Feb 6, 2014 at 12:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GeriHew
      GeriHew

      @litper:

      Wrong.

      Gay men watch straight porn because they like the guys. Straight men watch straight porn because they like the girls. And bisexual men watch straight porn because they like the guys and the girls.

      And Jake Cruise re-branded his “Straight Guys For Gay Eyes” for DVD and VOD when he realized that many of his customers were women.
      http://vod.hotmoviesforher.com/video/178027/Straight-Guys-For-Gay-Eyes-For-Women-Too-Johnny-Walsh/

      Feb 7, 2014 at 2:54 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • glasshole
      glasshole

      @GeriHew: actually, you’re wrong, kind of… The “rebranding” was done without Jake’s knowledge by a VOD company he’d licensed the movies to. He talked about that in an interview once. His site is still called “straight guys for gay eyes.”

      Feb 7, 2014 at 12:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Niall
      Niall

      Lol, SG4GE, what a shit idea that was. If I was a gay guy interested in watching guys fuck girls, I’d go watch straight porn, there’s plenty of good ones out there where you get to see a lot of the guy too. SG4GE was just shit. Surprised no one has tried to come up with a “straight for pay” kind of porn site yet, where only famed gay porn actors who identify as gay have sex with women, lmao.

      Feb 7, 2014 at 2:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • glasshole
      glasshole

      @Niall: Jake Cruise did a few of those “Straight for pay” scenes and apparently they sold ok but the biggest problem was all the gay guys who didn’t want to watch it threw a hissy fit that it existed at all, which is a bit hypocritical. You want people to think your way of having sex it ok and dump on other people who don’t do things you like.

      fuck, now I sound like Jake’s lackey. I didn’t like SG4GE either, but in that same interview he said that it made money but the main reason he did that site was to find straight guys who were willing to do gay as well. They’d make their first porn and see what that was like so it would be easier to do a gay porn and it was also a good way of talking guys into doing shoots. Apparently they’d come down and do a few gay scenes and a solo and the straight scene was like a “bonus” for them.

      Hate on Jake all you want but he’s not a bad businessman if he’s still going after all these years.

      Feb 7, 2014 at 2:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Niall
      Niall

      @glasshole: Do you have any link to that? If I remember, the models Jake Cruise used in his scenes, were gay for pay actors who had mostly done loads of gay porn, but didn’t identify as gay, however they were popular amongst gay guys. If you’ve got a link to the scenes where he actually used real gay actors in straight scenes, then I’d love to see it, as it’s something I’ve been slightly curious about.

      Feb 8, 2014 at 2:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Niall
      Niall

      @glasshole: Also, to add the only actually “gay” porn star I can remember doing this on 2nd thought was Steve Daigle.
      On the “hissy fit” issue, if I had to guess, i’d say some of it stemmed from the “homosexuality is a choice” thing. In some people’s minds, seeing a supposed gay man who’s having sex with women, can reinforce that notion

      Feb 8, 2014 at 2:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GeriHew
      GeriHew

      @glasshole: I would take what Jake Cruise says in interviews with a pinch of salt. But if it wasn’t his idea to re-brand his “straight porn for gay” eyes as “for women too” then he should really thank the VOD company for doing it because it was obviously a very good idea.

      The Johnny Walsh video on Hot Movies For Her
      http://vod.hotmoviesforher.com/video/178027/Straight-Guys-For-Gay-Eyes-For-Women-Too-Johnny-Walsh/

      The Johnny Walsh video on Gay Hot Movies
      http://www.gayhotmovies.com/video/178032/Straight-Guys-For-Gay-Eyes-Johnny-Walsh/

      Sold as for women too it gets more and higher viewer ratings. I cross checked other titles in the series to see if this is a consistent pattern. And it is. When this content is sold as “For Women” on a porn for women website it sells better. And that means a lot more money for Mr Cruise, as he gets a 20% cut on every pay-per-view sale.

      Feb 9, 2014 at 2:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • LeNair Xavier
      LeNair Xavier

      @Niall: Actually, the site has done “straight for pay”. With Steven Daigle and Arpad Miklos are 2 names that I know of.

      But to go back to your point about watching straight porn, with straight porn, especially American-made straight porn, the focus is too much on the woman. SG4GE was made for the focus to be on the man. So while I have criticized Jake Cruise and Steven Daigle for their actions, the premise of the site was NOT a “shit idea”. The thought of it being a “shit idea” comes from a lacking in maturity to appreciate the beauty of ALL human sexuality, regardless of gender and orientation. Especially straight sex when without it, NONE OF US would be here.

      With that said, I remember Johnny Walsh’s (Shaun’s) scene. He looked like he had that biker-edge like straight pornstar Mark Ashley. And it’s a shame he looks like a roided-up boozer now. Because back then I would have gave it up to him. Now, she can keep him.

      Feb 9, 2014 at 10:16 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Niall
      Niall

      @LeNair Xavier: Actually my point was besides Steven Daigle which I acknowledged above and now Arpad Miklos, I cannot remember any actual gay stars used. What I do remember was guys who had done gay for pay and were famous for gay porn, but were actually straight- like AJ Irons were the ones that appeared in those films. If you’ve got more, I really would like to see as I looked all over the internet, but can’t find more examples.

      As for Jake Cruise, I find it pointless. There’s actually a lot of porn especially in recent times now where there’s just as much focus on the men as the women and I found that hotter than anything Jake Cruise ever made. In fact the difference between SG4GE and those kind of porn films is that Jake Cruise’s site interviews the guys before the action starts, which is pointless to me as I really don’t give a rats ass what the guy has to say and how straight he is and how he’s never done this before.
      I’ve seen a few of the SG4GE vids and I didn’t see any more of the guy than I did in your average modern porn movie, except maybe for some of the guys getting rimmed, which as a gay guy, I don’t understand why that is appealing, though as a woman I can understand. So besides the fact that we get to hear the guy talk at the beginning(big whoop), I don’t even see how it’s more guy focused- I still got mostly the same amount of guy flesh I get in the straight porn movies I sometimes watch. And it is a shit idea, that was executed even more shiteously. If that makes me “immature” and unable to appreciate heterosexual sex or whatever, despite the fact that I actually do watch some straight porn, then I’m glad to remain immature.

      Feb 9, 2014 at 3:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • glasshole
      glasshole

      @Niall: you’re just plain wrong.

      In the vast majority of straight porn, there’s barely a view of the guy’s face. It’s all focused on the women and the men are barely in frame. With the SG4GE scenes, the guy is fully in frame and the women are edged out to the side. In a lot of them the women were wearing clothes. I liked it because I do like seeing straight guys get off. It’s a thing. I honestly like gay porn with just gay men the most but sometimes I’m in the mood for other stuff. Like most people, I think.

      They also did a Bi scene that had two separate edits, one that showed action only between the guys with the girl and one that showed action between the two guys. I dunno why but I liked the one where the guys kissed and blew each other in front of the girl better.

      Feb 9, 2014 at 8:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Niall
      Niall

      @glasshole: I never denied that in the majority of gay porn, the focus is still the woman, but like I said you can still find LOADS of videos out there that are straight but still male focused. Google Hakan Serbes, a lot of his vids are old and he did straight porn, but I still saw as much of him in the vid as I did of the guys in most of SG4GE vids, in fact he even gets fingered in a few vids and those were from close to 10 years ago. Maybe it’s just the straight porn I watch, as I see enough of the guys to get me off. Maybe another slight difference is no shots of the vagina.
      And the women in the SG4GE vids do eventually get to removing their clothes, it’s not like they keep them on forever.

      Straight porn can be an interesting alternative too, no doubt, but my point still remains that SG4GE did not only fail to do anything you haven’t seen before if you look well, they also went about it in a rubbish wat.

      Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Queerty now requires you to log in to comment

    Please log in to add your comment.

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.