Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  SUFFER LITTLE CHILDREN

STUDY: GLSEN Report Indicates LGBT Students In Rural Areas At Greater Risk

A study released this week by the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network indicates that LGBT students in rural areas are victimized more but have less access to resources and support than kids in urban environments.

Strengths and Silences: The Experiences of LGBT Students in Rural and Small Town Schools used data collected from more than 8,000 secondary-school students who were polled in GLSEN’s 2011 National School Climate Survey.

Among the study’s findings:

·         87% of rural LGBT students reported being verbally harassed, 45% reported being physically harassed and 22% reported being physically assaulted at school in the past year because of their sexual orientation.

·         91% of rural LGBT students heard “gay” used in a negative way (e.g., “that’s so gay”) and 79% of LGBT students frequently or often heard other homophobic remarks (e.g., “dyke” or “faggot”) at school.

·         3 in 5 (61%) rural LGBT students heard remarks about students not acting “masculine” enough; 42% had heard similar comments about students not acting “feminine” enough frequently or often at school.

·         Only 13% of rural LGBT students reported that school personnel intervened always or most of the time when they heard homophobic remarks, and 11% said school personnel intervened when they heard negative remarks related to gender expression.

·         Rural LGBT students who experienced higher levels of victimization were less likely to plan to attend college than students who experienced lower levels of victimization (85% vs 93%).

·       Only  11% of rural LGBT students reported having an LGBT-inclusive curriculum (i.e., having been taught positive things about LGBT people, history, or events in their classes), significantly less than the 18% of suburban and 20% of urban students.

·         27% of rural students reported having a GSA at school, compared to 55% of suburban students and 53% of urban students. But when there was a GSA at school, rural students were more likely to attend than urban and suburban students.

·         Rural LGBT students were significantly less comfortable talking about LGBT issues to school personnel than either urban or suburban students.

·         36% of rural LGBT students had missed class and/or a day of school in the past month due to feeling unsafe, compared to 30% of suburban LGBT students and 30% of urban LGBT students.

“These students are frequently the most isolated , both physically and in terms of access to critical resources and support,” stated GLSEN Executive Director Dr. Eliza Byard. “Our findings require us to both honor their resilience and respond to their needs.”

 

By:           Dan Avery
On:           Dec 13, 2012
Tagged: , , , ,

  • 2 Comments
    • hyhybt
      hyhybt

      Nothing surprising in here, but it still helps to quantify.

      Dec 13, 2012 at 5:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jeff4justice
      jeff4justice

      It’s not just youth but LGBTI and ally adults who are also lacking resources in these rural, suburb, small town and even some under-served areas in big-city areas. The disparity in what these areas have compared to big-city areas where there are LGBT centers and multiple groups is appalling considering the ton of money and celeb power poured into LGBT groups these days.

      This is why I support newly forming group GETBLISS which is working to reduce this disparity for all LGBTI and ally people in these areas.

      Check it out: http://www.getblissgroup.org

      Dec 15, 2012 at 12:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.