Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
the shot

There’s a New Calvin Klein In NYC Featuring a Naked Male Model. Where’s the Outrage?

THE SHOT — We’ve deduced that the only thing that gets New York City residents (and the tabloid newspapers who quote them en masse) riled up more than a MTF fare hike is a Calvin Klein billboard featuring a scantily clad male model. Indeed, sexy lady models are fine with the passers-by. Which has us wondering: How long until this new billboard featuring model David Agbodji gets everyone furious?

By:           editor editor
On:           Feb 1, 2010
Tagged: , , ,
  • 20 Comments
    • Brent
      Brent

      Ugly.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:04 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      Complain? No way. What NYer would want to be accused of homophobia AND racism?

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • RomanHans
      RomanHans

      MTFs are charging for a ride now? Think I’d better spring for a monthly pass.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      The way the light hits his oiled body is pretty gorgeous.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DEREK WASHINGTON
      DEREK WASHINGTON

      Calvin used a Black model this time. No outrage will come. Very shrewd especially coming from a man who never uses Black models on his catwalks. Or cynical. I never buy his stuff anyway because of his casting issues. Sorry CK.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • The Artist
      The Artist

      @Brent: Ummmm…. how is this ugly? This ad is no way offensive. Isn’t the human body a work of art, well at least some.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 10:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ohmygaga
      ohmygaga

      Queerty’s headlines are worthy of outrage. Today it’s a missing word (billboard? ad?). Usually there’s a misspelled word or two, though.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 11:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ooo
      ooo

      So shiny!

      Feb 1, 2010 at 11:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Austin
      Austin

      The shot on the left is gorgeous.
      The shot on the right is awfull,
      the clothes look cheap, don’t fit,
      and his expression is about to drool.
      Fail.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 11:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Same Crap
      Same Crap

      Thanks for giving us his name. And thank you google image search.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 11:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MissLaWanda
      MissLaWanda

      This is so racist.

      Feb 1, 2010 at 12:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dontblamemeivotedforhillary
      dontblamemeivotedforhillary

      OMG – Body Dysmorphic Disorder – Gross!

      Feb 1, 2010 at 8:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Drew
      Drew

      I think its hot. He’s hot, the suits hot. But they needed to tailor it or something in the shot on the right, its too baggy around the midsection

      Feb 2, 2010 at 6:56 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dontblamemeivotedforhillary
      dontblamemeivotedforhillary

      He looks more freakin’ hungry than sexy! I’m sure he had to sleep with Calvin “Backroom Cumdumpster” Klein!

      Feb 2, 2010 at 8:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • benlayvey
      benlayvey

      @The Artist: Thank ou for putting that foll in his place! But the ass on that boi, Whoa!

      Feb 2, 2010 at 12:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • benlayvey
      benlayvey

      fool*

      Feb 2, 2010 at 12:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • benlayvey
      benlayvey

      You*

      Feb 2, 2010 at 12:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • WhereAreTheRealMen?
      WhereAreTheRealMen?

      Where is St.LUcia?

      Feb 2, 2010 at 12:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dontblamemeivotedforhillary
      dontblamemeivotedforhillary

      Saint Lucia: Situation of homosexuals; availability of support groups and state protection (2006-2009)
      The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) indicates that homosexual acts are illegal in Saint Lucia (ILGA May 2009, 35; see also GlobalGayz n.d.; Canada 1 June 2009, Sec. 8). According to Section 133 of Saint Lucia’s Criminal Code, No. 9 of 2004 (Effective 1 January 2005):

      1) A person who commits buggery commits an offense and is liable for conviction on indictment to imprisonment for –

      a) life, if committed with force and without the consent of the other person

      b) ten years, in any other case.

      2) Any person who attempts to commit buggery, or commits an assault with intent to commit buggery, commits an offence and is liable to imprisonment for five years.

      3) In this section “buggery” means sexual intercourse per anus by a male person with another male person. (ILGA May 2009, 35; Saint Lucia 2004, Sec. 133)

      Although there is no law specifically forbidding homosexual acts between two women (United and Strong Mar. 2009), Section 132 of the Criminal Code, regarding “Gross Indecency” states that “[a]ny person who commits an act of gross indecency with another person commits an offence and is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for ten years or on summary conviction for five years” (ILGA May 2009, 35). Gross indecency is defined as “an act other than sexual intercourse (whether natural or unnatural) by a person involving the use of the genital organs for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire” (ibid.). However, the Criminal Code states that this law does not apply when “committed in private between an adult male person and an adult female person, both of whom consent” (ibid.). In a telephone interview with the Research Directorate, a board member of the Caribbean Vulnerable Communities (CVC), a coalition of community leaders and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) which provides services for groups vulnerable to HIV infection (CVC n.d.), stated that as of June 2009 these laws are still in effect (CVC 10 June 2009). According to the CVC Board Member, the laws are enforced, although not always prosecuted (ibid.).

      Feb 2, 2010 at 12:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • The Artist
      The Artist

      @WhereAreTheRealMen?: Okay don’t be ignorant, if you don’t know where a place is….look it up! St. Lucia is a beautiful caribbean island; however, it is not gay friendly. So the irony here is that the ad is running (annoyingly) on a gay web site. PEACELUVNBWILDYALL!

      Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.