Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  media misfires

Why Time Forgot To Mention The Gays In Its Giant Marriage Cover Story

Time magazine, the news weekly that’s slightly less awful than Newsweek, published an entire cover story on the state of marriage in America … and forgot to mention The Gays. “I guess, the story we were trying to tell is a different story, one we thought had been less explored than the fight over gay marriage. It’s about how the way we practice marriage now is changing the economics of our society. While the fight over gay marriage is a very big deal, we felt we had told that story pretty well elsewhere, dating back to 2004,” says reporter Belinda Luscombe, evidently concluding that stories about the current state of warfare don’t have to mention Iraq or Afghanistan, because hey, those things get covered all the time. [AfterElton]

By:           editor editor
On:           Dec 6, 2010
Tagged: , ,
  • 7 Comments
    • No. 1 · Chris

      Well, there are plenty of wars in Africa that are getting ignored because of the over reported wars in afghanistan and iraq….

      Dec 6, 2010 at 2:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 2 · jak

      These old-styled magazines are fast becoming obsolete just like their definition of marriage.

      Dec 6, 2010 at 3:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 3 · WillBFair

      I am such a huge dingbat. Am I to understand that California already has a domestic partnership law? And we’ve wasted all these resources there instead of on enda. Oh my sweet Autumn melancholy. The self destructive crowd have done it to us again.
      If only I could make the argument in court today.
      ‘Your honor, let me reference the landmark case of Drag Queen v Mary Girl. There it was definitely shown that Jungle Red lip stick should only be used with pink blush, and since we already have domestic partnership far queers in this State, denying them marraige is illogical and unfair. Case closed.’
      Now who can argue with that?

      Dec 6, 2010 at 3:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 4 · Ian

      Ug, how many times must it be said; it’s about Marriage Equality for Gay Americans NOT ‘gay marriage’. Would I ask the African-American couple down the street, “Hey how’s your BLACK marriage going?” Of course not, and to do the same by saying ‘gay marriage’ is to separate it from the norm from the get-go.

      Dec 6, 2010 at 6:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 5 · SpiffyShindigs · Member · 65 comments

      @Ian

      You really expect people to refer to it as “Marriage Equality for Gay Americans” in casual conversation? Gay marriage gets the point across just as well with a quarter of the syllables.

      Dec 6, 2010 at 10:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 6 · pete N sfo

      @SpiffyShindigs: Hey Spiffy, I’m w/ Ian on this one… the very point is that we refer to “marriage equality” and by inference, marriage INEQUALITY, not ‘gay-marriage’ Get it? If you still don’t, ask a friend, seriously.

      Dec 7, 2010 at 12:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 7 · PatrickB

      @SpiffyShindigs: or just Marriage Equality. And fuck “wasting Time”.

      Dec 7, 2010 at 12:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag

    Add your Comment




    It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


    Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.