British reality star Sean Pratt is fond of seducing his ample Instagram fans with slews of revealing pics — but the site decided he just went a little too far and removed one of his images.
Related: PHOTOS: “Ex On The Beach” Contestant Brandon Myers Enters Adult Entertaiment Industry
Moderators censored this photo of Pratt going “commando” in a pair of gray sweatpants, and now he’s furious:
It's time!! Heading to Essex for @MOKOEvents @maisonsbar wearing full @IIWII_UK ???? pic.twitter.com/U6FuuzfAi2
— SEANY? (@Sean9pratt) October 14, 2017
“I will never understand why it’s acceptable for girls to post near pornographic pics,” he writes, “yet a bit of cock outline and this happens… pathetic.”
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
I will never understand why it's acceptable for girls to post near pornographic pics. Yet abit of cock outline and this happens ??? pathetic pic.twitter.com/NYxVmvgxp5
— SEANY? (@Sean9pratt) October 19, 2017
We certainly hope this snafu won’t put a damper on what Sean continues to do best — which is post photos like this:
Giuseppe
How is it that the same person can be hot and yet not at all?? Sexy until you look at all the tattoos…then not so much.
Creamsicle
At least his tattoos have a coherent theme and are rendered decently. I don’t understand guys who spend 100+ hours per month at the gym and then decide to get random ass tattoos that make them look like a toddler who got into the sticker drawer while nobody was looking.
niles
In your (weird) opinion. The real story is why you are not commenting on the article, instead are making an extremely tired, repetitive and bitchy whine about a subject that is none of your business.
RIGay
Agreed. Not a fan of ink.
Xzamilloh
I love ink… and in any case, tats are something one do more for themselves than anyone else, because they’re the ones that have them for life.
RIGay
@Creamsicle – ROFL! Great analogy!
tham
So sad, a beautiful man destroyed by a bunch of tattoos. It’s just a shame really.
heath0043
@Creamsicle… I agree!
Mick406
Tattoos are for the immature who are attention seeking.
freepour66
tats can be hot but the real issue is why delete a pic showing VPL but Kim Kardashian can put up pics in clothes that barely cover her tits double standard
BriBri
I’m not a tat fan but I must admit this guy is sexy as hell!
Jack Meoff
He clearly has a hardon in that photo no wonder it was removed
Bob
Maybe that IS soft… mmmm… Wonder why I’m getting hungry??
Armiya
Every time someone is featured that has ink, a group of people b*tch about it. So effing what? Not everyone wants to look like a bland Tommy Bahama/Ralph Lauren clone.
Bob
And tats are totally about the person getting them. Not meant to impress anybody.
Armiya
Exactly @Bob. I’ve got several, and I’m pierced. Have been for decades and I can’t tell you how many a*sholes who hit on me, felt the need to give me their opinions on how I looked: colored hair, ink, my piercings etc. Meanwhile their white socks still couldn’t blind me to the fact they were wearing a polo shirt and cargo shorts. Seriously, if someone is inked and that’s possibly the “worst” they’ve done to their body, so be it. It’s more attractive than the drunk, soft, flabby out of shape Queens judging.
porthuroncub
To all these people commenting on his Tattoos really you don’t have to be a fan or like them its not YOUR body its his and if he can live with them or likes them its his own business so move on bitchy queens
dfwenigma
This will sound so dumb to so many – but sexiness to me comes from the inside. I think sometimes a shirt and pants with a very suggestive but not obvious outline of various things with a gorgeous smile and beautiful eyes can make the brain’s biggest sex object – our brains – run marathons. This guy is oversexposed. I’ve seen stuff from the turn of the century that was, far sexier, showing much, much less.