Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register

Gay Republican Hopes To Make Waves In NY Senate


Don’t judge Senatorial hopeful John Chromczak by his Republican cover.

The first openly gay Republican to run for New York state Senate, Chromczak knows his odds are slim, especially considering he’s running for the 25th district, which includes lower Manhattan and part of Brooklyn.

Though he’s faced resistance from a variety of voters, he’s particularly perturbed by some gay voters, many of whom Chromczak says have become politically close-minded.

Discussing his participation the recent Wedding March here in New York City, Chromczak laments:

When I’ve gone to some of these things, I get shot down as soon as somebody hears that I’m a Republican. To me, it’s very discriminatory and goes against a lot of what people say.

I don’t understand why, if you’re a liberal progressive, you don’t want to have an open mind and sit down and have a legitimate conversation about a variety of issues without automatically balking because I’m a Republican. It made me very angry.

Those are the same feelings as being in gym class and somebody’s calling me a faggot – it’s the same thing when I’m walking across the Brooklyn Bridge and somebody’s berating me because I’m a Republican. How is that inclusive? How does that defeat bigotry and homophobia?

Before you yourselves balk, keep in mind that four New York state Republicans this year made serious headway with a queer inclusive anti-bullying bill.

Our editor recently sat down with Chromczak to discuss a variety of issues, like how the politico balances practicing Catholicism with his sexuality. Also, Chromczak tells voters how he intends on fixing the state’s economy, tells us why Senator Chuck Schumer’s a thorn in his side, informs us that we shouldn’t care about John McCain’s cancer, takes on the city’s left-wing gay paper and offers his thoughts on why he – a medical technician with little political experience aside from union membership – should be sent to Albany. All that and more, after the jump.

Andrew Belonsky: I’m sure you’re aware that Albany can be a difficult city to deal with, so what qualifies you to go up to Albany and make serious changes?

John Chromczak: A lot. I think not only my life experience, but also my strong desire to do something for the community I live in, Lower Manhattan. We need to stop sending back the same old career politicians who keep saying they’re going to do something and never do anything. This year everybody’s talking about change and being a little bit more open-minded, so I decided to put myself out there. I’m an average Joe, like everybody else – I wake up in the morning, I go to work, I go home at night, I worry about how I’m going to pay my bills and the increasing cost of just living in the city. Something needs to be done. Many of the people we have up there now are incapable of working together and doing something for New York.

AB: What steps, as a lawmaker, would you to rectify our state’s economic troubles? As you know, we have no money here.

JC: I think it’s just being honest about it. Listen, we’re probably going to have to cap the state budget – we’re going to have to say, “We’re only going to spend [x] amount of dollars.” We’re going to have to make some very severe cuts in New York State’s budget.

AB: What programs would you cut?

JC: First of all, we have to prioritize. What are going to be our top three priorities in the state? I think clearly education is going to be one of them. We need to not only increase funding for that, but we need to spend those dollars more wisely, especially in New York City. Number two – I don’t agree with a lot of people when it comes to health cost in New York State. We spend over $45 billion a year in New York – that’s more than California and Texas combined. I think we can make some cuts there. I think we can get more into waste and fraud, which is, by several measures, around $18 billion a year. That’s $18 billion that we could have been spending building schools in New York City, paying for more teachers to reduce class sizes. So, yes, there are things we could do in health care. And I say that as someone who has been working in the field for ten years.

AB: At NYU Medical.

JC: Yes. And I’m also a union member. I’m 1199 member. I’m one of those people who could potentially be affected by decreasing costs or fixing costs in health care. The third thing, specifically for New York City, is that we have to get the World Trade Center rebuilt and we have to get it done sooner, rather than later. It’s the single most important construction project in the United States. It’s going to keep us competitive with cities like Hong Kong, Dubai and London. All these cities are competing to be the financial capital of the world, meanwhile everybody’s sitting back in New York, saying, “Well, it’s going to be us forever.”

AB: But if our nation is in this current financial crisis, even if we do get the building erected in the next – let’s be optimistic: five years – who is going to go in there? How are we going to regain our financial center?

JC: We have to show the rest of the world, number one, that we can get that done; that it’s not going to take us 20 years to rebuild a 16-acre site, when you can go to Dubai, which is a beautiful, modern city that literally built itself out of desert in ten years.

AB: But does Dubai have the same workers’ rights as the United States?

JC: No, they don’t, but it’s part of being in a global market. I’m not saying that we want to turn into that, but we have to know how to compete with that, because there are a lot of countries around the world who are looking at their bottom line. Why spend $100 in New York City when we only have to spend $60 in London, or $70 in Hong Kong to have our company headquarters there?

AB: You grew up in Utica, New York, in what I gather was a religious family.

JC: I did.

AB: Was it very religious?

JC: Yes. We were Catholic.

AB: So, growing up, did you go to a church that talked trash about gay people? Was that a challenge for you?

JC: You know, I have to be honest with you – I’m a practicing Catholic, I went to a public grammar school and a Catholic high school and I never heard anything from the pulpit, but I did hear a lot about people making fun of me. I got beat up all the time, people said snide remarks – that had more of an impact on me. My own personal religious experience is that in a lot of ways – my Catholic faith gave me something to hold onto, something to grasp – and it still does today.

AB: Even knowing that the Vatican would not approve of you?

JC: There are a lot of things about Catholicism that I do agree with and I’m not going to throw the baby out with the bath water because of one or two isolated issues.

By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Oct 6, 2008
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,
  • 17 Comments
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      “I don’t understand why, if you’re a liberal progressive, you don’t want to have an open mind and sit down and have a legitimate conversation about a variety of issues without automatically balking because I’m a Republican. It made me very angry.”

      If Mr. Chromczak would like to see what trying to have an open minded conversation with a homocon is really like, I’d suggest he head over to the Gay Patriot blog and read some of Bruce’s postings and more importantly, the comments left by his gay conservative readers. “Very angry” best describes most right wing gays.

      Better yet, read North Dallas Thirty’s blog; or American Elephant’s blog; or any of the other homocon blogs–including the now defunct homocon.com–and get a taste of what trying to debate a homocon brings one–emotional futility.

      I apprecite Mr. Chromczak’s thin veneer of open mindedness. However the true personality of the homocon belies his calls for open mindedness–on the parts of others. When Mr. Chromczak asks his fellow homocons to stop molly-coddling anti-gay leaders in their chosen party, his opinion and that of others sharing his opinion will matter to the other 80% of LGBTQ Americans.

      As far as praising Dubai, Mr. Chromczak, please take a vaction there and while there, try walking along the beach while holding your partner’s hand. Then return, if they let you, to America and tell us how brillaint Dubai is

      Oct 6, 2008 at 4:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      BTW–Andrew, I don’t usually nit-pick your spelling, but in the States, it’s “boogie man”, not “bogey man”, which is the UK version of the legend. Unless Mr. Chromczak is telling us he is not Humphrey Bogart. This is an important interview, let’s keep it tight.

      Oct 6, 2008 at 5:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • greybat
      greybat

      Rebuild the world trade center? Gods! I guess all the world loves a phallic symbol…
      I wonder if John realizes that many republicans have earned the dislike bestowed upon them? That guilt by association is a powerful thing, not easy to shake off?
      And does he really want to shake it off?

      Oct 6, 2008 at 5:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Justin Tyme
      Justin Tyme

      OK, I won’t judge him because he is a republican. I’ll judge him by the fact that he supports a party that, quite frankly, would rather see all of us dead. The republican stand for one thing–getting as much money into their own hands at the expense of everyone who is not inside the straight, male, white, christian, anglo “normative center”.
      This guy is just a testament, like his Log Cabin brothers, that greed extends across all lines of sexual orientation.

      Oct 6, 2008 at 7:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • CitizenGeek
      CitizenGeek

      Boo hoo! Do I need to remind Mr. Chromczak of all the nasty things Republicans do to gays? How can he just conveniently sideline all of that?

      I hope and would pray (were I a believer) that greedy “gay Republicans” get everything they deserve (and this includes a colossal loss for this politician in his upcoming election). I know that sounds petty, but Republicans have proven again and again how much they utterly and completely hate gay people and it’s gone beyond the stage now where it’s acceptable or even reasonable to support gay rights AND the Republican party simultaneously.

      Oct 6, 2008 at 7:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andrew Byrd
      Andrew Byrd

      I hope that at least some people see the prejudice that John Chromczak faces being a gay republican, from both Republicans and also from a number of gays. I think it is unfair for us to automatically write him off as a illegitimate candidate when in fact he does wholeheartedly support marriage equality and other causes that would be beneficial to the gay community. Is it not unjust for African Americans to automatically write off a black candidate because he is a republican (i.e. what happened to Clarence Thomas in the early 90’s)? Why doesn’t the same logic apply here?

      Oct 6, 2008 at 9:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • greybat
      greybat

      I don’t think anyone wrote off Clarence Thomas for being republican, as they did for his being a sexual predator and a hypocrite.

      Oct 7, 2008 at 12:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • greybat
      greybat

      I don’t think anyone wrote off Clarence Thomas for being republican, as much as they did for his being a sexual predator and a hypocrite.

      Oct 7, 2008 at 12:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bob R
      Bob R

      Queerty, you have lost any and all control over your blog. It has been over run by right wing lunatics, and now there’s posting in Arabic that goes on and on about what? There has to be some moderation of responses or the comments section is just going to implode.

      Oct 7, 2008 at 9:03 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Darth Paul
      Darth Paul

      Yeah, Bob R is right. Some douchebag AIPAC republican is obviously trolling hard here.

      But…Chromczak is kinda cute. I wouldn’t vote for him, but I’d make him squeal.

      Oct 7, 2008 at 9:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • M Shane
      M Shane

      I agree about the lack of consideration shown to other readers by some twits, who can’t do more than childish pranks. Remove their posts if you can.

      This Chromczak is just running the status quo right wing B.S about saving money by spending less on things kie health care. The only veneer I see is the malarkey related to “oh come listen to me. it’s not what you think ” and it is! the same old stinky republican economic crap.
      I wouldn’t vote for him in a hundred years unless he changes his politics to something humane.

      Oct 7, 2008 at 3:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Chris
      Chris

      ok so what can we do to support his opponent? Better a straight liberal than a gay neo-con asshole.

      Oct 8, 2008 at 10:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • blake
      blake

      Andrew Bird,

      This guy does not face “prejudice” from other gays! He’s a frickin’ Republican! He gets the same treatment that straight Republicans get! Disdain for how they have screwed up the country and engaged in decades of despicable behavior.

      Gay or straight, Republicans are part of a party that is based on hate, hypocrisy, and greed. Republicans, gay or straight, largely, wrap themselves in the flag and spew hatred.

      Paul mentioned some of the vile, hateful homocon conservatives, like North Dallas 30–a vicious racist, homophobe. Why should gay people be any accepting of a gay republican who aligns himself with people like Rush Limbaugh, Karl Rove, etc? Aren’t homocons the ones who always talk about “not voting” their “sexuality”?

      Look at the evil gay Republican trolls on this site. Racist scum like Church-nazi, Men-sar, RCPV, etc. They are all out in force to spew racist hate. That’s the face of gay Republicans.

      Queerty Editors,

      As others have mentioned, you have allowed the comments section to be infiltrated by racists and Republican trolls. There’s a difference between intellectual discourse that can get harsh.

      Instead, we have blatantly racist comments from posters like Churchill-y and others. Why is this?

      Oct 8, 2008 at 12:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • greybat
      greybat

      Nicely put, Blake!
      But do remember, not all trolls are republicans…a troll is a troll first and above all else.

      Oct 8, 2008 at 1:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jim
      Jim

      Nothing is more egregious than a Republican whining about how “liberal progressives” are so close minded towards them. Being a liberal Democrat certainly does not mean that I need to be faux tolerant toward a political party and ideology I find repugnant. People choose to be Republicans. I am not going to trip over myself to be polite or “broad minded” about their asinine choices or political opinions.

      On a second front, the New York State Senate Republicans have kept the anti-bullying bill bottled up for a decade and have never once let it come to a vote. So spare me the crap about making progress on it. If the Republican majority wanted it passed, it would presently be the law. That simple.

      Oct 8, 2008 at 8:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John LowerEastSider
      John LowerEastSider

      Daniel Squadron, the democrat that Mr.Chromczak is running against is a great fighter for LGBT people.
      Daniel Squadron believes in full equality for gay people and believes in protecting gay families. Openly gay NY State Senator Daniel J. O’Donnell has endorsed Daniel Squadron. Daniel Squadron has a gay brother he is very close with.

      Oct 9, 2008 at 5:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brooklyn Bobby
      Brooklyn Bobby

      Yea. John’s right. Plus Daniel Squadron was endorsed by the Gay City News.

      Oct 9, 2008 at 5:03 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     




    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.