Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  conditional advocacy

NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg Only Willing To Push Republicans On Marriage At The Last Possible Second

Michael Bloomberg, the king of New York City, last month appeared in a video for the Human Rights Campaign’s hackneyed New Yorkers For Marriage Equality, where he delivered the line, “I’m a New Yorker, and I support marriage equality.” It was enough for the gay blogs to light up and paint Bloomberg — who Equality Matters head Richard Socarides will defend to his death, despite the man’s support of known homophobes — as some pioneering gay rights advocate. He is not. With the state’s Gov. Andrew Cuomo forming some sort of battlestar team to push for gay marriage in New York, all Bloomberg can do is promise to engage the state’s Republican lawmakers if and when he believes a marriage equality bill might actually reach Cuomo. “If there’s a chance to pass a bill, I will do it,” he says. “I’ll go lobby.” Know what that’s a commitment to do? Follow, not lead. Get involved at the last minute, not take a stand in the immediate. This is the man who is the largest fundraiser for New York State’s Senate Republicans; he can influence both with his remarks and his checkbook. And yet he’s only committed to your marriage rights if you do all the heavy lifting first. Which, of course, New York’s gay leaders and some Democratic lawmakers are on board with already. But Bloomberg will happily take the baton for the last mile and get all the glory when we cross the finish line.

By:           Max Simon
On:           Mar 23, 2011
Tagged: , , ,
  • 2 Comments
    • No. 1 · robert in NYC

      He did that in the first introduction of a same-sex marriage bill in 2009 and look what happened. Not one republican voted for it and eight democrats voted against it. What I don’t get it is why is Dean Skelos, GOP leader calling for a vote on it? Does he know something that we don’t? Could it be that there are maybe two or three republicans willing to cross the line?

      Mar 23, 2011 at 3:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 2 · Schteve

      Of course there are. There was at least one who in all likelihood seriously wanted to last time: http://blog.timesunion.com/cap.....-marriage/

      Anyway Queerty, would you rather Bloomberg not do anything at all?

      Mar 24, 2011 at 3:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag

    Add your Comment




    It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


    Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.