Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  xmas agendas

Wherein Davey Wavey Asks Santa To Reverse His Childhood Mutilation

What does Davey Wavey want for Christmas this year? His foreskin! Warning: This video is less a holiday wish list than it is a war on circumcision. So what can Davey do now that he’s without a sheath? Well Santa could bring him one of these devices, though they’re more of a stocking stuffer than an under-the-tree present.

By:           Max Simon
On:           Dec 12, 2010
Tagged: , , , , , ,

  • 65 Comments
    • Devon
      Devon

      Davey Wavey, circumcision, and a mention of mutilation all in one post?

      God help us all Queerty, you’ve opened Pandora’s box.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 1:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Soupy
      Soupy

      Please Davey, ask Santa for some depth.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 2:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • randy
      randy

      I’m sorry, but life is too short. If you’re circumcised, just get over it and get on with your life.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 2:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jesus
      jesus

      i really hate this guy

      Dec 12, 2010 at 2:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • will
      will

      sorry dabey wavey but genital mutilation is an Abrahamic thing… Jews and Gent… well Muslims. SO that makes it popular in pretty much most of the known world.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 2:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Qjersey
      Qjersey

      Arrgh, so tired of these dipshits equating circumcision with “mutilation.” As the procedure does not interfere with function or the ability to orgasm “modification” may be a better word.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 2:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • divkid
      divkid

      man up / put on some clothes / or get a routine /or turn in your gay permit

      Dec 12, 2010 at 3:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • divkid
      divkid

      the only dick i need to see fully covered is you

      [meant with love]

      Dec 12, 2010 at 3:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Berto
      Berto

      Lets start small: get your brain back and then worry about foreskin.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 3:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • divkid
      divkid

      Don’t give him the oxygen of publicity. “I’m not that happy with him having the oxygen of oxygen actually” [linda smith. comedian]

      Dec 12, 2010 at 3:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @will: Latin Americans and Europeans usually don’t do circumcision, and they are predominantly Christian.
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Global_Map_of_Male_Circumcision_Prevalence_at_Country_Level.png

      @Qjersey: “mutilate” can mean “to disfigure by damaging irreparably.” If a guy decides he wants his foreskin after his parents have cut it off, he can’t have it. That’s because his parents mutilated him!

      Dec 12, 2010 at 4:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Teluride
      Teluride

      Well I must admit, it’s sometimes funny to watch a 4 year old in an adult, well, boyish body, but Babey Wavey is just a bit over the top for me.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 4:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • That Bitch Téa Delgado
      That Bitch Téa Delgado

      It’s not mutilation. It’s sculpted for greater beauty and enhanced pleasure.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 6:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mack Robertson
      Mack Robertson

      Israel and the US? For better or worse, how about Islamic countries?

      Dec 12, 2010 at 6:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @That Bitch Téa Delgado: It’s totally fine someone wants to “sculpt” his body. His parents should leave that decision up to him!

      Dec 12, 2010 at 6:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • alejandro
      alejandro

      i find it hilarious that ppl stil thinks its okay to circumcise children. even if you dont like davey wavey, he does have a point. this should be the person’s decision when they are of consenting age.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 7:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Richie
      Richie

      I’m fine with being circumcised.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 7:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • pete N sfo
      pete N sfo

      Just b/c it’s a cultural norm in the US does not make it right.

      Of course a parent shouldn’t have the right to permanently alter their child’s genitals… duh?!

      It’s what you know… I find uncut dick far preferable & more attractive than cut. I tried to persuade my sister w/ her kid & he ended up having to get cut twice! He’s still not right, btw. lol

      Dec 12, 2010 at 9:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @pete N sfo: OMG. I hooked up with a guy with a botched circumcision once. It was so tragic. Although fitting, in a Darwinian sense.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 9:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mario
      mario

      i’m so sick of this shit. i’m circumcised and i really don’t appreciate having my dick referred to as mutilated.

      i think uncut dicks are disgusting. messy, stinky, fleshy little windsocks that look like they belong on a dog rather than a human being. they’re an instant turn-off. but do I go around professing that to the world? no, I shut up and keep it to myself. that’s something the outspoken dog-dong advocates of the world might wanna try, as opposed to constantly screaming and crying about mutilation.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 10:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @mario: Interestingly, that’s how human penises look, unless they’re mutilated. Washing it is as simple as pulling the foreskin back, and scrub-a-dub.

      Dec 12, 2010 at 10:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jack
      Jack

      @mario: Er, you just did.

      Sorry you got your dick hacked up without your consent, but try not to be so bitter about it! ;)

      Dec 12, 2010 at 11:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @mario: Last time I checked, human males came with foreskin, unless, of course, they are were mutilated by their loving parents.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:17 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jacknasty82
      jacknasty82

      honestly who cares that much one way or the other. I’m cut, I probably wouldn’t have my son’s circumcised but I don’t really feel like I’ve lost out on anything not having a foreskin. the only reason I’d even consider it is that in some places circumcision is so commonplace that uncut guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 3:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bubba in TX
      Bubba in TX

      Yes, technically circumcision is, by definition, “mutilation”. However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.

      Everyone has a right to their opinion on this subject, but including that particular word in the headline is asking for trouble.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sean
      Sean

      I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible. (And don’t hide behind “health” reasons; only a very small percentage of men see any health benefit from circumcision in any way, and that’s a decision that can easily be postponed until the kid has a say.)

      I understand in an intellectual sense that infant circumcision is common in the US, and even some of the reasons it persists, but on a gut emotional level it seems absolutely insane that right after a baby boy is born, someone would decide “OK, so now this is how I want his cock to look.”

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      Get over it. Sheesh, an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.

      Perhaps Davey needs to start thinking of something more immediate…like picking up the want ads.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 7:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jhon
      jhon

      @That Bitch Téa Delgado: because nothing ‘enhances pleasure’ like irreparably destroying thousands of important sexual nerve endings! also, if you’re such a fan of elective cosmetic surgery on infants in order to achieve ‘greater beauty’ than I suppose you support nose jobs for infants as well?

      Dec 13, 2010 at 8:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      Please Davey, you gots a huge enough peen, stop your cryin!

      Dec 13, 2010 at 9:09 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JDE97
      JDE97

      What a douche.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 9:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @mario:

      but do I go around professing that to the world?

      You just did.

      no, I shut up and keep it to myself.

      I wish you would.

      dog-dong advocates

      Your obsession with bestiality is disturbing.

      Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.

      @jacknasty82:

      in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.

      See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?

      @Bubba in TX:

      However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.

      And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.

      @Sean:

      I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.

      Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.

      @Cam:

      an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.

      But his parents gave him the opportunity to decide for himself. That is the big deal.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 9:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andrew B.
      Andrew B.

      Fortunately circumcision rates are on the decline in the US, but male’s genitals deserve the same protection female genitals get in the US.

      http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/u-s-circumcision-rates-on-the-decline/

      I would certainly like to have more of my touch sensitive nerves back but I will work with what I have, but I think it is important to advocate to stop this disgusting practice. Even if it were just a cosmetic change, it still should be banned for the same reason we don’t let parents put tattoos all over their infants.

      As far as I am concerned on look of circumcision: it makes the penis look like some unnatural mushroom. This is a case where nature knows best.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 9:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @mario:

      but do I go around professing that to the world?

      You just did.

      no, I shut up and keep it to myself.

      I wish you would.

      dog-dong advocates

      Your obsession with animal genitalia is disturbing.

      Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.

      @jacknasty82:

      in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.

      See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?

      @Bubba in TX:

      However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.

      And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.

      @Sean:

      I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.

      Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.

      @Cam:

      an ex of mine got circumcized when he was around 22, he said there wasn’t much of a difference.

      But his parents gave him the opportunity to decide for himself. That is the big deal.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 9:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • scott ny'er
      scott ny'er

      @Cam: why at 22 would he get circumsized? just wondering.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 10:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      @scott ny’er:Possibly becasue of something similar, I friend of mine gots snipped at 13. The foreskin was too tight once he hit puberty and his peen started growing he couldn’t get an erection without tremendous pain…………The healing process is pretty rough not something would advise doing simply for vanity reasons…….

      Dec 13, 2010 at 10:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • pete
      pete

      @PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS: As I cross my legs……

      Dec 13, 2010 at 10:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • meego
      meego

      @mario: Amen to that, brother!!! Totally with you on this one! Reminds me of this uncut guy I was about to go down on. The stink almost made me sick! Beuark!

      Dec 13, 2010 at 10:57 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • divkid
      divkid

      @scott ny’er: i knew a guy who got cut at 36yrs. he had barely been able, if at all, to retract his foreskin, so painfully tight was it. he had NEVER EVER seen his own helmut in its full glory. the hygene implications dont bare thinking about: we must be talking cheese prodution on an industrial scale!

      Dec 13, 2010 at 11:02 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      @scott ny’er:

      I think it was sort of a split second decision after the last of numerous “Zipper Incidents”.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 11:09 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Eric
      Eric

      I have 2 friends that got circumsized as adults-one gay that didn’t like how it looked and one straight whose wife wouldn’t marry him until he did.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 11:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @mario:

      but do I go around professing that to the world?

      You just did.

      no, I shut up and keep it to myself.

      I wish you would.

      dog-dong advocates

      Your obsession with animal genitalia is disturbing.

      Mario,I don’t usually say this, but you sound like you’d be a lousy lay. Bitter, whiny, self-centered. All around sad.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @jacknasty82:

      in some places heterosexuality is so commonplace that gay guys would get mocked in locker rooms and such.

      See what I did there, Jack? If your boys were gay, would you pursue re-orientation to make them just like all the other boys?

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @Bubba in TX:

      However, we all know that “mutilation” is a loaded, inflammatory word, and using it when discussing circumcision shows a definite anti-circumcision bias.

      And what’s wrong with having a bias against circ? I am definitely opposed to neo-natal circumcision. If an adult male wants to have cosmetic surgery on his penis, it should his decisions to make as an adult. Do yourself a favour–lookup “circumstraint” on goolge images, and understand why so many of us oppose neo-natal circumcisions.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      What the fuck is going on with all the moderating of comments here? It’s getting to the point that just responding more than once, is considered spam. Bullshit.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @Sean:

      I don’t really think it matters whether or not you like circumcision, no one should ever perform cosmetic surgery on a baby’s normal set of genitals. Forget the hysterics or defensiveness; it’s something that should be obvious from just a basic idea of an infant as a person who deserves (or one day soon will deserve) the right to control their own body as much as is possible.

      Exactly. But don’t expect too many people to follow your line of logic, Sean. You’d think gay men who are constantly bombarded with shouts to change, and conform, and “act” like everyone else, would be more receptive to the idea that a new born male should have the right top remain intact, until he reaches and age when he may decide for himself what to do with his penis.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 12:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS
      PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

      @Mr. Enemabag Jones: Queerts gots the most bizzare moderating criteria. You can post cock, prick, dick, schlong, tool, junk, and any other word you can conjure up for your three piece set. But if ya try to post the forbidden word p e n i s you get autoflagged……….go figger

      Dec 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS:

      Tell me about it! Nothing more frustrating than getting cock blocked on a blog 8^(

      Dec 13, 2010 at 1:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jonny
      jonny

      circumcision is NOT mutilation in the sense that we now use the word mutilation. I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse. Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child, in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds… Anything to prevent this, no matter how small is welcomed.

      To claim it is unnatural to circumcise is a boat full of shite. What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation? Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?

      The choice is the parents to make.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 2:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Michael C
      Michael C

      I assume you mean the overbite?

      Dec 13, 2010 at 3:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • BenB
      BenB

      When I have kids, I’m gonna have their pinkies cut off. My religion, BenBarianism, says that’s what Yahweh wants, and having less fingers to wash is obviously more hygienic. Plus, lots of people are into amputees. And when it’s done properly, it won’t endanger the child, it’ll just mean having an excruciating wound for a while.

      Come on people. We’re surely evolved beyond this point by now. I’m all about people having the choice to cut parts of themselves off if they want to, but not being able to choose is incredibly unfair. Bodily integrity is a human right.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @jonny:

      I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse.

      Jonny, go to google images, and type in the word circumstraint. Look at those images, and tell me that is not abuse.

      Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child,

      There is a picture. A picture of a newborn male. A newborn male who’s parents consented to a circumcision. The doctor used a clamp. It is applied to the foreskin, tightened, and it squeezes off the foreskin. This newborns foreskin became infected. His parents raised concerns with the doctor, and their concerns were dismissed. The boy’s penis became gangrenous. The image of what doctors in an ER had to do to that newborn to save his body, and life are so horrifying, and gruesome, that even after seeing it once, I still can’t get that image out of my mind. What that boy will have to go through with operations, disfigurement, and pain for the rest of his life are staggering.

      Complications happen daily with newborn circumcision, and they are swept under the rug, daily.

      I will not post that picture here. But I will tell you, jonny, circumcisions do endanger children. Hundreds every year. And we never hear about it. Maybe because they’re not girls.

      in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds

      So does washing, and condoms.

      What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation?

      Hair grows back, even after a bad haircut.

      Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?

      Glasses, and contacts don’t alter the body.

      The choice is the parents to make.

      Just as it’s your choice to be freely, and openly gay, it’s a man’s choice to decided what will happen with his penis.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @jonny:

      I am sick of hearing it described as something verging on child abuse.

      Jonny, go to google images, and type in the word circumstraint. Look at those images, and tell me that is not abuse.

      Study after study proves it is far more hygenic and does not endanger the child,

      There is a picture. A picture of a newborn male. A newborn male who’s parents consented to a circumcision. The doctor used a clamp. It is applied to the foreskin, tightened, and it squeezes off the foreskin. This newborns foreskin became infected. His parents raised concerns with the doctor, and their concerns were dismissed. The boy’s member became gangrenous. The image of what doctors in an ER had to do to that newborn to save his body, and life are so horrifying, and gruesome, that even after seeing it once, I still can’t get that image out of my mind. What that boy will have to go through with operations, disfigurement, and pain for the rest of his life are staggering.

      Complications happen daily with newborn circumcision, and they are swept under the rug, daily.

      I will not post that picture here. But I will tell you, jonny, circumcisions do endanger children. Hundreds every year. And we never hear about it. Maybe because they’re not girls.

      in the long run it helps that little bit to prevent stds

      So does washing, and condoms.

      What next? Cutting a childs hair is unnatural? mutilation?

      Hair grows back, even after a bad haircut.

      Correcting thier vision unnatural? Giving them glasses mutilation?

      Glasses, and contacts don’t alter the body.

      The choice is the parents to make.

      Just as it’s your choice to be freely, and openly gay, it’s a man’s choice to decided what will happen with his penis.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      Whoever is in charge of posting reader’s comments here on Queerty–FUCK YOU AND YOUR CENSORSHIP.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 5:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • randy
      randy

      @Mr. Enemabag Jones: You seem to be having problems….what is it you are trying to post that they are not letting you?

      Dec 13, 2010 at 6:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JP
      JP

      This is just so stupid. I’m circumcised–certainly not what I’d consider “mutilated”, my pole looks pretty good to me and seemingly anyone else who’s been down there–but I have no highly generalized animus towards any other poles, either way. I’ve seen some incredibly ugly cut poles and just as many incredibly ugly uncut poles.

      With due respect to passionate (sometimes fanatic) opinions on both sides, this topic seriously needs a rest. Get over it.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 6:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Thank you
      Thank you

      Well I would like to personally thank my parents for mutilating, cutting, hatching, butchering, circumcising or whatever you want to call it.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 7:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • PatrickB
      PatrickB

      @jonny:
      If you don’t
      1) want to pull back your foreskin to clean it,
      2) want to get teased in the locker room (if that isn’t the case already for being gay) or
      3) like how foreskin looks

      then get circumsized! It your choice. Yay freedom! Yay America!

      Just don’t do it to anyone else without his consent.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 7:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mr. Enemabag Jones
      Mr. Enemabag Jones

      @randy:

      what is it you are trying to post that they are not letting you?

      I have no idea! I dropped the F-bomb, and it went right past the spam filters. Yet I post a reply to another commentator, and it gets caught up in moderation. Five comments so far that contain no obscenities, no vulgarities, and no cursing, have been blocked. Yet I shout out a giant f-you, and there it is, for all to see.

      Dec 13, 2010 at 8:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jeffree
      Jeffree

      @Mr. E-bag Jones:
      Happens all the time to me too. Comments take about a week to be posted after you get modulated (!), if ever. None of my comments that got sidelined went against T.O:S. but they still vanished…

      — — — —
      Doesn’t Wavey Diva have more important or interesting items for his Santa Bring-Me list? yeesh, he’s self-absorbed!

      Dec 13, 2010 at 8:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • David
      David

      Right on, Davey Wavey!

      Since the angry cut men on here are freely lashing out, let me say that cut is ugly. All the defensiveness is in recognition of this reality. I guess if you’ve been forced to be circumcised, you can either work to end it or defend it. Davey is on the right path.

      Dec 17, 2010 at 12:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Queer Supremacist
      Queer Supremacist

      Every man I’ve ever known (in the Biblical sense) has just loved my cut cock. And I love not having to constantly clean up smegma. Uncut cocks are disgusting, especially those on which the foreskin cannot be lowered to reveal the head. You dog-dong advocates are basically equivocating moils to Lorena Bobbitt. That alone is enough reason to discredit the anti-circumcision propaganda.

      Dec 17, 2010 at 1:04 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Soupy
      Soupy

      Davey is a vapid, shallow goof. His opinion on any subject would generally force me into choosing the opposite.

      Dec 17, 2010 at 1:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ashton C
      Ashton C

      I love my uncut dick and couldnt even begin to imagine having my skin chopped off. why not chop off earlobes?

      Dec 17, 2010 at 10:43 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Soupy
      Soupy

      Or put holes in them? How crazy is that?

      Dec 17, 2010 at 11:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hugh7
      Hugh7

      @ #61 Queer supremacist: “You dog-dong advocates are basically equivocating moils to Lorena Bobbitt.” With an effort I translated that to “..equating mohels…”, and no, we’re not. We’re equating doctors (>97%) and mohelim (<3%) to people cutting healthy, functional (erogenous) non-renewable parts off others' genitals without consent or justification.
      (If you hate "those on which the foreskin cannot be lowered to reveal the head," you should try a cut one with a skin-bridge. And intact men don't "constantly" have to clean up smegma. A few seconds a day, easy – and fun!)

      @Soupy #62: Then you'd sometimes be forced into taking some pretty stupid positions.
      #64: Piercings are reversible, circumcision is not.

      Jan 5, 2011 at 5:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.