Boy, oh boy! Things are probably hectic in California right now, where the Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that Proposition 22, a ban on gay marriage, is unconstitutional.
The bad news is that the court also acknowledged that San Francisco “acted unlawfully by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in the absence a judicial determination that CA statutes limited marriage to union between a man and a woman are unconstitutional.” The 2004 marriages
would thus are still be nullified, but who cares? Now they can have another wedding!
[Note: a commenter correctly pointed out that those 2004 marriages have already been wiped clean. Thanks, CNN. You jerks.]
Here’s a choice bit of the 172 page ruling: “In contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individualâ€™s capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individualâ€™s sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individualâ€™s sexual orientation â€” like a personâ€™s race or gender â€” does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights.
We therefore conclude that in view of the substance and significance of the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship, the California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples.”