Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
at the movies

Is Jodie Foster Raging Against Innocent Teens Now?

Did Jodie Foster assault an innocent 17-year-old fan? Or was she just trying to keep some paparazzi jerk from harassing her family?

Depends on who you ask. The father of the teen, who filed a battery complaint over the May 29 incident, alleges the actress of pushing and shoving him so hard he was bruised — all while he was just trying to catch a movie with his girlfriend at The Grove in Los Angeles!

Or? Not. Foster’s rep insists, “This guy was most definitely a professional paparazzo. He had a large camera bag and 1000mm telephoto lens. He tailed Jodie and followed her all the way from the movie theater to the valet.”

So less of a fan, more like an enterprising amateur stalker?

On the police report, completed by the alleged victim because police did not bother responding at the scene, Foster’s name is spelled wrong.

By:           editor editor
On:           Jun 12, 2010
Tagged: , , ,
  • 6 Comments
    • Kendall
      Kendall

      How in the world is a 17 year old kid a “professional paparazzo” ? Did he start taking pictures when he was 7? Maybe if Jodie would just come out she wouldn’t have anything to hide and wouldn’t mind having her photo taken. I used to like Jodie, but she was wrong in this case.

      Jun 12, 2010 at 7:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • rrr
      rrr

      The rest of the comments from Foster’s rep in the article: “He crowded her and her two young children and took photos of them the whole time,” says the rep, adding that the actress went up to him and asked him to stop.” “This guy’s behavior was completely inappropriate,” says the rep, “and the police report is a fabrication of the incident.”

      Kendall, I really think she’s still not going to want her kids photographed if she finishes coming out.

      Jun 12, 2010 at 9:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Fitz
      Fitz

      I think that this kid was probably too aggressive, and that her response was also. I don’t see why she doesn’t have a body guard 24/7 after the whole John lennon thing.

      Jun 12, 2010 at 10:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • truthteller
      truthteller

      I didn’t know there was an age requirement to be a paparazzo.

      In this day and age a 17 year old guy would be the perfect person to be a paparazzo. He would know all about digital technology …are you kidding me?

      He can use that a nice digital SLR. A Mark II, D5 or D7 maybe. Edit on photoshop and email to his favorite buyer. Hell, he can even send them an HD .mov file at 1080p or 720P

      Jun 13, 2010 at 8:14 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • David Ehrenstein
      David Ehrenstein

      The bitch’s career is SO OVER. She should be delighted that ANYONE wants to take a picture of her.

      Jun 13, 2010 at 11:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ewe
      ewe

      Fosters name was spelled wrong. That in itself is enough to have it dropped and disappear.

      Sep 15, 2010 at 2:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     


    POPULAR ON QUEERTY


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.