Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
sex stings

Palm Springs Cops Testify They Asked Park Cruisers To ‘Show Me What You’ve Got’

Just because Palm Springs Police Chief David Dominguez resigned his post — following a pseudo-acknowledgment that called gays “cocksuckers” and “filthy motherfuckers” while engaged in a public sex sting — doesn’t mean the fun from the 2009 Warm Springs operation is over! Police officers have been taking the stand this week during a case brought by some of the men arrested, who claim they were entrapped by police and unfairly targeted them because of their sexual orientation. And while the court room has not (yet?) seen videotaped footage from the arrests, the testimony alone is titillating.

Taking the stand, the officers involved in the sting have been insisting they did nothing wrong, The Deseret Sun reports:

Palm Springs police decoys in the 2009 Warm Sands gay sex sting said they did not entice those arrested to expose themselves, as court hearings on whether to drop the charges continued Tuesday in Indio. “I pretty much just stood there. People would walk up to us,” Palm Springs officer Chad Nordman testified. He did say “show me what you’ve got” to those arrested — but only after they approached him first, Nordman added.

Indio-based public attorney Roger Tansey said videotaped footage of the arrests, which hasn’t been made public, contradicts the decoys’ testimony. Even if the decoys were coy, another policeman, Sgt. Matt Beard, testified he simulated a sex act by himself behind a pool filter while providing undercover security for the decoys. Beard said he wasn’t instructed to do that, but he aimed to mimic “what was going on around me” and “dispel any suspicion that I was an undercover officer.”

Well then!

So what about claims the entire operation was anti-gay from the start? Plaintiffs say that bias is evidenced not only by cops refusing to go after straight folks engaged in public sex (like at a parking garage they received reports about), but also by the word choice of the officers involved, notes KPSP.

The defense continued to grill Lt. Dennis Graham who testified all day on Friday. For the first time he identified the officer who used a gay slur during the June 2009 operation. That officer, Sgt. Bryan Anderson also investigated the Warm Sands neighborhood before the arrests and organized the four day sex sting. Graham testified Friday Sgt. Anderson used the slur while quoting a movie, calling it an “icebreaker” to help break tension among officers. Sgt. Anderson is scheduled to take the stand Wednesday.

Attorneys for the men arrested in the sting say police displayed a discriminatory attitude against gays. They say PSPD had received complaints of indecent exposure and lewd conduct by straight couples at a public parking garage and Knott’s Soak City but did not make arrests or conduct an undercover sting. “The Palm Springs Police Department has for years given men and women special rights in Palm Springs to have sex in public,” said Deputy Public Defender Roger Tansey. “They have never, ever – there is not one case – of a man and a woman being arrested for having sex in a car or some other public place.”

In addition, the defense points out that no one – gay or straight – had been arrested in the Warm Sands area for indecent exposure or lewd conduct during the two years that lead up to this sting. They say that’s because public sex wasn’t really a problem and, therefore, the police officers discriminated against the gay community in that neighborhood by performing a sting.

The fun continues today, with more coppers swearing to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about their anti-gay sex sting.

By:           Ryan Tedder
On:           Jan 26, 2011
Tagged: , , , , ,
  • 9 Comments
    • mark c
      mark c

      Hey Palm Springs –
      I’m not going to spend my gay money in your town.

      Jan 26, 2011 at 11:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SouthSideShorty
      SouthSideShorty

      Listen, there’s nothing wrong with guys having a cruise spot, but you can’t infringe on other people’s right to enjoy a public area, no matter how horny you might be at the time. Don’t want to be targeted for arrest by the cops? Then don’t turn a public place into a pickup joint. Situation solved. How easy was that?

      Jan 26, 2011 at 11:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • One of the CA 36,000
      One of the CA 36,000

      I can see both sides of this. The Warm Sands area is home to a large number of gay, clothing-optional resorts, a lot of which offer day/night passes. A lot of guys hang out around the resort entrances hoping to get in and, er, sample the contents.

      But that’s also a residential neighborhood. The resorts are found among houses and condos, so Palm Springs citizens are coming and going while the horny drunk gays are going and cumming– or hoping to cum.

      It’s a bit more than a public place, in that sense. We’re not talking a public park bathroom– we’re talking parking lots outside motels turned into gay resorts, with Palm Springs hoi polloi driving past.

      Guys, you should be able to behave your damn selves in public. No matter how drunk or horny, parking lots in residential neighborhoods are NOT cool for showing the goods in hopes of getting a quick BJ. Sorry, that’s just how it goes.

      On the other hand, the PS Police really skirted close to entrapment here. That’s not cool either.

      Jan 26, 2011 at 11:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • christopher di spirito
      christopher di spirito

      I guess I’m in a minority but public sex and/or toilet sex just isn’t attractive to me.

      I’m not judging anyone and I think people should do whatever they want, as long as it’s between consensual adults, and doesn’t involve children or animals but, why not take it home, where you have clean sheets, privacy, and a shower when you’re done?

      Jan 26, 2011 at 12:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Andy
      Andy

      I don’t have public sex, but let’s forget this Sharia/Victorian era busybody morality.

      Two guys have sex semi-public (let’s not pretend parks at night are public), or show each other their junk… so what? Does that happen and all the sudden we’re trillions of dollars in debt or massacred a hundred thousand Iraqis? Fight the real criminals, plenty of them.

      Jan 26, 2011 at 1:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • jak
      jak

      This bust was bogus, but come one, people. There are plenty of places in the Warm Springs area to have all the sex you want behind high privacy walls. In fact, these resorts are set up just for that purpose.

      Jan 26, 2011 at 1:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DR
      DR

      @Andy:

      They are quite public. A number of local clubs and individuals run in the local park that the pervs like to use to cruise. Should we be subjected to being cruised in the restroom by some dirty old man because he doesn’t have the common sense to hit Manhunt?

      Jan 26, 2011 at 3:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JUSTICEONTHEROCKS
      JUSTICEONTHEROCKS

      @Andy:

      To paraphrase Barack Obama: we can do more than one thing at the same time. You sound like wars and debts prevent society from having some boundaries of propriety.

      The fact that you find the latter notion Victorian suggests that you are on the margins vis-a-vis mainstream social norms.

      Jan 26, 2011 at 9:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Joe
      Joe

      So a cop tells me to show him what I got. Being a good citizen, I obey!

      Feb 19, 2011 at 9:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • QUEERTY DAILY

     


    POPULAR ON QUEERTY


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.