Is This a Damning Report About the Mormon Church’s Involvement in Passing Proposition 8?

Over the next three weeks, is anybody in the Perry trial going to bring up the M-word? No, not “marriage” — “Mormon.” With the LDS Church insisting it only donated some $2k in cash and $20k in legal services, evidence suggests there’s something a little more nefarious going on. And this is the stuff not of speculation or rumormongering, but concrete data — money spent on Internet, multimedia, and advertising campaigns; yard signs, propaganda — that points to their overarching involvement and influence in ProtectMarriage.com’s campaign to pass Prop 8. So why would anyone bring this up at Perry?

There’s plenty of other ammo that the plaintiffs’ attorneys, Ted Olson and David Boies, can load up in Vaughn Walker’s courtroom. But part of their strategy relies on convincing Walker the defendants’ based their campaign in promoting discrimination. Evidence that shows there was religious-based discrimination at play in what should be a secular matter might bolster their argument. And Olson/Boies are already trying to introduce the television ads from the “Yes On 8” campaign, which the Mormon Church stands accused of funding.

Or maybe they’ll just leave the M-word to the IRS, which is being pressured to investigate the LDS’s Church’s tax-exempt status.

Get Queerty Daily

Subscribe to Queerty for a daily dose of #politics #afer #americanfoundationforequalrights stories and more


  • Mountainword

    If there is one way I know to hurt money-grubbing Morons (M exempted on purpose) – then it is to take away their tax-exempt status. They want to play secretive hardball? You got it bitches! It’s ON!

  • Attmay

    There is plenty of anti-Mormon prejudice in this country.

    It needs to be carefully encouraged and exploited. We can bring down this hate cult in our lifetimes.

  • Cam

    If any other group had done this the IRS would be all over them. So in this time of soaring national debt why is the IRS dragging it’s feet investigating a group that so obviously violated the tax laws?

  • RomanHans

    This is a fine example of the bigotry that’s still hard-coded in American government. Whereas a paltry 1,500 people can prompt the FCC to act against a gay performer like Adam Lambert, every gay in America couldn’t get the IRS to enforce the separation between church and state.

  • terrwill

    It’s scary when one thinks that the founding fathers could
    see so far into the future when they drafted the separation
    church/state laws……….And that a church that was
    founded so it entitled members to MULTIPLE marriages can
    be so against anyone wanting to get married……….

Comments are closed.