Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
the don't tell show

The Proper Way To Rule On Air Force Maj. Margaret Witt’s DADT Suit Is So Obvious, The Trial Is a Blast!

Air Force Maj. Margaret Witt’s jury-free DADT trial is underway in Washington State and already we’re having so much fun! Yesterday Master Sgt. James Schaffer, a longtime friend and colleague of Witt, testified that gays and lesbians in his unit had no impact on morale or whatever the Justice Department keeps dreaming up, and that Witt’s discharge “was a dishonorable act on the part of the Air Force.” Schaffer says he knew of 12 homos in the unit of more than 100 — including two couples within the unit.

Those comments came after DoJ attorney Peter Phipps made his opening remarks, insisting Witt “compromised her integrity and her ability to lead” by … BEING IN A LESBIAN RELATIONSHIP. One that she actually kept quiet. And one the Air Force was only made aware of because the husband of the woman she was dating tattled to her superiors. The same type of action that Defense Sec. Robert Gates says would no longer count as a reasonable means of information gathering for a DADT investigation.

Also taking the stand yesterday: Retired Sgt. Darren Manzella, who came out to his superiors in 2006, even offering his commanders photos of he and his boyfriend holding hands. He pinned up a photo of them together. Two years later, he was removed.

It’s too soon to tell how U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Leighton will rule on this baby, but watching Witt’s camp battle against DoJ, you almost start feeling bad for the federal government.

By:          Sarah Nigel
On:           Sep 14, 2010
Tagged: , , , , , , ,
    • Michael Ejercito

      The government is alleging that Major Witt had committed adultery while in the service.

      If accepted as fact, that would change the dynamic of this case.

      Sep 14, 2010 at 11:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Steve

      Only if they actually discharged her for adultery. Which they didn’t.

      It’s true that she had a relationship to a married woman (her current partner), but she wasn’t punished specifically for that. They can’t use that now to justify it.

      Sep 14, 2010 at 12:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Michael Ejercito


      Of course, the Air Force can reinstate her (thus mooting the current case) and then discharge her for adultery.

      Applying DADT to homosexual conduct that falls under adultery is clearly within the limits of the Constitution.

      Sep 14, 2010 at 1:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • demandsocial

      your own groupon clone has never been easier. http://www.demandsocial.com provides the best groupon clone with the most comprehensive group buying features.

      Sep 15, 2010 at 1:28 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.

  • Copyright 2016 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.