Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  Media

How 1 Missouri Couple’s Iowa Wedding Got a Newspaper to Change Its Policies

[flv:http://flash.video.worldnow.com/wdaf/WDAF_0306200921292133210.flv http://www.queerty.com/wp/docs/2009/06/kansaspaperannc.jpg 500 280]

What happens when your local newspaper is published in a state that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage, but you get gay married in a state that does? Well, you get the paper to change its wedding announcements policy.

Missouri’s Michael and Chuck Hewitt road tripped to Iowa on May 17 for their marriage license, but when they contacted the Kansas City Star to share the good news with the paper’s readers, they were turned down. Missourians, after all, amended their state constitution banning same-sex marriage in 2004; that means the newspaper never had to deal with the issue of gay weddings.

But after the Hewitts were quickly turned down by the Star, editors there decided to chat about their policy — and ended up reversing it, reports Fox 4. As of last week, the Star now publishes same-sex wedding announcements. According to reader’s editor Derek Donovan, “We couldn’t come up with a compelling reason why not to.”

As for the Independence Examiner, to which the Hewitts also submitted an announcement? Says publisher Steve Curd: “This decision was in no way a political statement of any kind. The Examiner‘s policy is to follow the law of the State of Missouri.” So, uh, that’s a no.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Jun 4, 2009
Tagged: , , , , ,
6 Comments

No. 1 · RM

Ummm….. since when is it against the law to publish same-sex wedding announcements?

The IE is making it up as they go along.

Posted: Jun 4, 2009 at 3:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Cam

All right for the Kansas City Star! :)

Posted: Jun 4, 2009 at 5:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Bitch, please!

I lived among these cretins. Kansas City Star showed courage and dared to take a huge gamble and I commend them for that. On the other hand, to the other paper, “Suck our cocks, you inbred hicks!”

Posted: Jun 4, 2009 at 8:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Alec · Member · 366 comments

@RM: Moreover, I’m sure that they monitor the marriage eligibility requirements, right? I mean, if their policy is to follow MO law, then certainly they make sure the couples aren’t already married, first cousins, etc.

Posted: Jun 4, 2009 at 9:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Alex

Yeah! Big shout out to all my Kansas City ‘mos. Of course, the Star already covered the marriage of the state senator for their district (as did Queerty) in Iowa.

Posted: Jun 4, 2009 at 11:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Mike Barton

@Alex: Missouri’s abbreviation: MO!

Posted: Jun 5, 2009 at 9:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.