Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  Read All About It

Will Jeff Bezos Change The Washington Post’s Caution On Marriage Equality?

Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, is buying the Washington Post and some other assorted properties for $250 million (or about one quarter what Instragram feteched when it was bought). Already the speculation is swirling as to whether or how Bezos will change the paper, but the most interesting question is what impact he may have on the Post’s stand on marriage equality.

The reason for raising the question: Bezos contributed $2.5 million to last year’s successful ballot measure to bring marriage equality in Washington state. That is far and away the highest-profile political position that Bezos has ever made. For someone of his corporate stature, Bezos is famously low key and his company seemingly uninterested in playing a role in Seattle civic life. 

The Washington Post has been supportive of marriage equality, but in an incrementalist way. Its editorials support full marriage equality — just not yet. In the best tradition of the mainstream media, the paper stakes out two sides of the issue and comes down in the middle, which isn’t likely to satisfy anyone.

Interestingly, earlier this year, the paper’s ombudsman wrote a column in which he denied that the paper was pro-gay but also said the paper “should do a better job of understanding and conveying to readers, with detachment and objectivity, the beliefs and the fears of social conservatives.” If, as the column insists, gay rights is a civil rights issue, it’s hard to see how opponents can be portrayed “with detachment” without giving their perspective more credibility than it deserves. It’s fine to be fair, but on some things you can’t be neutral.

Bezos may opt to have a hands-off policy on the paper’s editorial position. Or he may wish to focus on other issues, like the internet sales tax. But it’s worth wondering if the Post, which serves as the hometown paper for the Washington elite, may not get a little bolder. That would be a welcome development.

By:           John Gallagher
On:           Aug 5, 2013
Tagged: , , , ,

  • 3 Comments
    • Kangol
      Kangol

      Let’s hope so. He’s been pro-same-sex marriage.

      Perhaps he can wean them off all the warmongering.

      I just hope he doesn’t turn the paper into a giant pro-Amazon, libertarian rag.

      It was a very good paper once upon a time.

      Aug 6, 2013 at 1:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Caliban
      Caliban

      Bottom line. The owner’s politics influence the paper. They can’t help but not.

      Every WaPo writer who writes something sympathetic to the Religious Right regarding gay rights will now know they are in opposition to the owner’s stated opinion.

      There won’t be any overt censorship. Just a less sympathetic attitude toward that kind of stated opinion.

      And isn’t that the point?

      It used to be that it was a lone voice in the news who was openly, vocally in favor of gay rights. Now if you’re going to be openly homophobic you have to explain yourself. The positions have switched, incredibly fast. And I’m not feeling much pity for those who still write homophobic columns or Op-Eds.

      Aug 6, 2013 at 2:56 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      Out with the old, in with the new.

      Aug 6, 2013 at 1:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.