Across two seasons and counting, Netflix’s Regency era drama Bridgerton has become known for ripping the bodice right off any stuffy old period piece genre tropes, titillating its audience with hot young actors and scandalous hookups.
And though the Shonda Rhimes-created franchise has made a habit of casting queer talent—including the sexy Jonathan Bailey as eldest Bridgerton son Anthony, and the fabulous Golda Rosheuvel as Queen Charlotte—it has yet to bring gay romance to the screen… until now.
The new spin-off series Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story focuses on the eponymous queen’s story across two timelines: in 1817 as she (Rosheuvel) pressures her children into producing a royal heir, and back in 1761 as she (India Amarteifio) begins her whirlwind, history-making romance with King George (Corey Mylchreest).
It’s then, in 1761, that we meet the royals’ most loyal servants, the Queen’s Man Brimsley (Sam Clemmett) and the King’s Man Reynolds (Freddie Dennis). While they work overtime to protect their respective bosses’ secrets, they’ve got a secret of their own: They’re in love!
Of course, given the time period, these men can’t exactly be open about their relationship. And while official royal business does afford these two plenty of time together, their affair largely plays out behind closed doors.
Speaking of which, in episode two of the series (about 12 minutes in) we’re treated to a little late-night rendezvous between Brimsley and Reynolds, and it’s pretty sexy!
While the Queen and King have a private meeting of their own, the servants steal away to Reynolds’ quarters, where they immediately—and passionately—tear off on another’s clothes. Compared to their rather cold and mannered interactions in public, the tryst is even hotter as they toss each other around and make an attempt to talk shop as they shove their hands down each other’s pants.
And there you have it: The first sex scene between two men in Bridgerton history!
(Actually, Queen Charlotte really ratcheted up the horny factor in general. By The Sun‘s count, the spin-off features over 20 steamy sex scenes across its six episodes. In other words, there’s a whole lot of getting-it-on going on!)
Related:
That time ‘Bridgerton’s’ Jonathan Bailey took his modesty thong out for a public spin
Turns out Jonathan Bailey held onto a special little (emphasis on the word “little”) souvenir from the set of ‘Bridgerton.’
Brimsley and Reynolds secret romance is one of the series biggest draws, but it’s also one of its biggest mysteries. At least in the first few episodes, neither character is anywhere to be seen in the later 1871 timeline, which leaves one to wonder: Can their love possibly last? Do they end up together?
We’ll have to get streaming to find out!
In the meantime, we’re just delighted to have series breakout stars Sam Clemmett and Freddie Dennis in our lives. Scroll down below for a few of our favorite shots from their Instagram pages:
All six episodes of Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story are now streaming on Netflix.
Related:
Netflix brings an infamously erotic novel to the big screen—and doesn’t skimp on the male nudity
Emma Corrin and Jack O’Connell star in this very steamy adaptation of a novel that was banned in multiple countries.
mz.sam
Bridgerton, a poorly written telenovela in historical drag with a C-list supporting cast.
Openminded
Are you sure you are watching the same Bridgerton that the rest of us are enjoying? Also, what’s wrong with C-list supporting cast?
smittoons
Bridgerton is awful, but it has at least elevated some deserving talents to bigger and better things. Rege Jean-Page and Jonathan Bailey, certainly.
Colorado Couple
Apparently millions of people disagree with you since Bridgerton is a huge hit. An innovative, imaginative show, well written with a stellar cast. Beautiful costumes, lush settings. And now we are looking forward to watching Queen Charlotte beginning tonight.
Kangol2
They try, though not as hard as they should.
jcool
that’s what happens when you use spellcheck instead of proofreading.
strap2900
I liked the first season of Bridgerton, but couldn’t get into the second season. With all the clothes they wear, and very little bathing, it was probably some nasty sex going on. Ewww
Pietro D
Openminded…… “Also, what’s wrong with C-list supporting cast”?
Stating such a ludicrous thought, openminded, simply gives any future watcher of the series
a reason NOT to watch!
nm4047
reason we (still) have perfumes and scented powder. Wigs also were as a result of lice etc in unwashed hair.
SDR94103
LOL, NO.
dbmcvey
So, this is just what you do.
SFMike
Just give us a gay male show without all the phony historical race mixing and feminist drivel to make maiden ladies and the PC crowd happy.
Kangol2
“Phony historical race mixing and feminist drivel”…open a history book!
There was “race mixing” in Britain going back to the era of the Romans. Elizabeth I was so alarmed by the large numbers of enslaved Black people she repeatedly ordered them out, though that didn’t happen. Black people and Arabs walked the streets of London in Shakespeare’s day, which is one reason he includes Black people in a number of his plays. Britain’s empire encompassed nearly the entire globe and every continent. And among gay men, race mixing was not uncommon (cf. the experiences of British soldiers and sailors, coal miners, gay men living in Britain’s industrial cities, etc.), going back centuries!
nm4047
#Kangol, maybe same could be said in response, a black queen of England. Slavery in Britain was still active. (abolishing in 1883).