While it’s the largest LGBT lobbying operation in America, a lot of people don’t know that HRC’s education and communications efforts are even more extensive. Their messaging in the media appeals to where the public will listen, not simply to what we think they should hear. HRC also houses a workplace equality project that may be doing more for ENDA, marriage equality and freedom to serve than could all the lobbyists in DC. The HRC Corporate Equality Index ranks corporations, including the Fortune 1000, on their policies toward LGBT employees, such as discrimination protection based on sexual orientation or gender identity and domestic partner benefits. This is not a glamorous or cathartic effort, nor one that attracts CNN cameras. In fact, it is painfully mundane. HRC staffers pan across the country meeting with — get this — HR representatives. They work methodically with LGBT employee groups and others to shift the thinking of corporate leadership, from executive suites to employee policy offices. HRC also publishes a buyers guide for LGBT consumers that pairs corporations with brand name products. It’s a model for all-American capitalist grassroots activism.
—Steven Fisher, HRC’s former communications and marketing VP, who “worked for Solmonese, who I believe is one of the savviest political operatives in Washington,” offering up some items to place in the organization’s “Positives” column [via]
Mark
Thank you.
Jon
That’s good now open a branch that gets headlines and policy pushed.
Lanjier
Messaging? What does that even mean! They have to be out of their fucking minds. I see sickening collusion with the Administration, gross incompetence in failing to cultivate and leverage political power, and royally fucking up any chance of repeal of DADT and DOMA. They can go fold up and fuck off.
edgyguy1426
I see a HRC ad in Queert’s future..
edgyguy1426
oops typo sorry, Queerty
DEREK WASHINGTON
WTF?
gaylib
sounds to me like they do a whole lot of nothing and get paid for it with donors money. Show me some evidence that any of this “capitalist grassroots activism” (whatever the hell that means) has accomplished anything in achieving equality for our community.
PopSnap
Don’t forget the fact that they provide a lot of young LGBT’s with business opportunities. I have a friend who is currently an intern there and she loves it.
Cam
Do you notice how they use trick language? For example…
“HRC’s education and communications efforts are even more extensive. Their messaging in the media appeals to where the public will listen, not simply to what we think they should hear.”
Ok, Bad grammar aside, what they are basically saying is that, “we aren’t putting any messages out there that we think may upset people.” So HRC, vague meaningless platitudes aside…just what exactly do you mean? What messages are you sending out?
—–
Or this sentance….
“”HRC also houses a workplace equality project that may be doing more for ENDA, marriage equality and freedom to serve than could all the lobbyists in DC.””
Now that was an interesting choice of words don’t you think? “MAY be doing more for ENDA than all the lobbyists in DC could.”
Well Gee, HRC, we would never know if that is true now would we. Because “MAY” means “Maybe”. So you have no concreate facts. Additionally, all the lobbyists in DC? Thats funny, because just a few lobbyists in DC managed to nearly kill the health care bill and they DID kill the public option. A few lobbyists managed to have Congress removed the safeguards that were preventing Wall Street from economic meltdown. And just a few lobbyists wanted Drilling off the Eastern coast of the U.S. So those few lobbyists were able to do some pretty massive things with just a few meetings. And yet you are trying to tell me that some class HRC runs “MAY” be doing more for ENDA and gay marriage than ALL of them could? Really?
And lastly, you call Joe Solumnase one of the most savvy political operatives in DC. Isn’t it funny then that the annoucement from the White House on ENDA seemed to take him completely by surprise. Wow, THATS SAVVY!
This is obviously an article written by a former staffer who needs to maintain good relations with the giant cash cow that HRC is.
AndrewW
These were glittering generalities, perhaps HRC can provide more detail.
I don’t believe HRC’s Lobbying efforts accomplish anything and they’ve never been able to provide evidence that they do.
It would be helpful to understand how HRC invests it’s $50 million annual budget. How much is lobbying and how much is in “other” areas.
“Messaging” can be very helpful in changing minds and it would serve HRC well to provide more detail. Our winning full equality is measured in changed minds more than anything else.
Perhaps HRC is changing itself and that would be welcome news. It might even change my mind about them.
Qjersey
Screw them, HRC sent out their operatives in my neck of the woods and DID NOT EVEN BOTHER to contact the THREE very well known LGBT groups that serve our area.
Qjersey
…and the fact is that our local groups struggle with fundraising…and HRC comes along with PAID staff to hawk for donations.
Thomas Johnson
AndrewW. STFU already. It appears that you troll a variety of blogs all day long and post the same comment over and over and over again. Sadly, the numbers you continue to spew are not even correct. Where has it ever been published that the HRC’s annual budget is $50 million. Can you actually add up and prove to me that the HRC has raked in +550M dollars? And, best of all…you can’t even get Joe Solmonese’s salary correct.
I would highly encourage you to do some real work…a little research. Get your facts straight.
Cam
@ No. 13 · Thomas Johnson
Thomas, much as AndrewW and I are usually in disagreement, what I noticed about your post, is the same problem in the article. You attack, but you don’t provide facts. Well ok, then, here are some facts. NOT counting Joe Solomnase’s salary ov over $300,000 here is a breakdown of HRC staff last year. Just what are we getting from these salaies? This isn’t all staff, and if you add in Joes Salary, they are spending approximately $2.5 million every year JUST for their execs salaries. This does NOT count the fact that Joe flies to every event out there, events like the Sundance Film Festival, and the GLAAD awards (I wasn’t aware that people at the GLAAD awards needed to be lobbied on gay rights) and not only does he fly there first class but is put up at high end hotels. So I think we could EASILY add another $200,000 to this pot for his travel budget.
Cathy Nelson
$226,948
David Smith
$206,753
Martin Rouse
$170,958
Susanne Salkind
$170,578
Alison Herwitt
$163,891
James Rinefierd
$156,878
Robert Falk
$142,495
Christopher Speron
$140,173
Elizabeth Pursell
$138,970
Andrea Green
$132,192
Kevin Layton
$130,480
Ann Crowley
$127,813
Halcyon Mathis
$125,525
Total: $2,185,803
Lanjier
The corruption is just appalling. And if they get rewarded for their silence by appointments in the Obama Administration, it will be a total throw-up moment.
Thomas Johnson
CAM:
Finally, someone that cites actual numbers.
Now, where in the HRC Annual Report does it say that Joe Solmonese actually flies First Class—or that HRC pays for it. Perhaps you should do some more detective work.
From personal experience, I know that if you fly enough, you earn “status” on airlines. For example, I fly American Airlines well over 50k miles a year. As a result, when I purchase a coach ticket, if it is available, I am upgraded to first class. Oh, and one interesting fact…American Airlines is a major sponsor to the HRC. Actually CAM, each time I book my own flights on AA, I enter a handy little code (527567)—this is for the HRC Business ExtrAA account. In addition to getting my own 50K+ miles a year, HRC is also getting miles to be used for their travel. How is that for contributing back to the community? It is all in the details CAM, all in the details.
Now, can you also provide proof that Joe is put up in “high end” hotels? Perhaps, just perhaps, he stays at regular hotels on the road like the Hilton, or maybe a Marriott? Do some more digging into corporate sponsors. I am an executive at one of the above mentioned brands, and I know what we give away in kind to HRC.
Don’t forget to use your HRC Business ExtrAA number when booking your flights!
Cam
@No. 16 · Thomas Johnson
Thomas, are we really going to play this game? Where you come on and say “but But But…maybe he used AIR MILES! Well ok, if you’re going to just make up ridiculous scenarios because you work for or with HRC, then I will just have to bore you with facts. Follow this link below to HRC’s 2008 IRS tax filing. Look at Schedule J form 990 (Page 27 of 39) Where it states that they buy him First class air travel. (An interesting side note, straight up expenses for 2008 were listed at $35,000,000.00. Yes, thats right, $35,000,000.00 And what exactly did we get in 2008 for that?
http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2009/521/243/2009-521243457-05555017-9O.pdf
AndrewW
@Thomas Johnson: Look at their IRS filing: http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2009/521/243/2009-521243457-05555017-9O.pdf
If you hunt through it you can find the $50 million in annual income. They also have several affiliates Including the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
Study it.
Thomas Johnson
Yes Cam, we are really going to play this game. If you look at Page 29 on the document you provided me, (Part I, line 1b) I see a word that you have left out. What does “on occasion” mean to you. Further explanation states that sometimes it is done so that the ticket is fully refundable because of last minute travel plans.
So typical, you are picking and choosing what is best for your argument.
AndrewW
@Cam: That IRS filing is for the Human Rights Campaign Inc. a 501(C)(4) and it shows $35 million. The Human Rights Campaign Foundation is a 501(c)(3) and it contributes another $10-12 million in revenue. Schedule G shows additional revenues from their Black Tie Dinners. Most Black Tie groups have separate legal identities, as well.
A few months ago a friend (who still works with HRC) confirmed about $50 million for 2009 income from all sources. He also confirmed that in the past 30 years they have received more than $500 million. Solmonese “benefits and travels expenses” are more than his salary.
I agree with you that we need more than a couple of cute paragraphs to determine how well they are spending millions of dollars. They don’t like to talk about it. They never talk about winning, either. THAT would end the party for them.
Cam
@ No. 19 · Thomas Johnson said…
Yes Cam, we are really going to play this game. If you look at Page 29 on the document you provided me, (Part I, line 1b) I see a word that you have left out. What does “on occasion” mean to you. Further explanation states that sometimes it is done so that the ticket is fully refundable because of last minute travel plans.
So typical, you are picking and choosing what is best for your argument.
—-
Thomas, please reread what you wrote to me in post #16…it’s right below
CAM:
Finally, someone that cites actual numbers.
Now, where in the HRC Annual Report does it say that Joe Solmonese actually flies First Class—or that HRC pays for it.
——
You asked me WHERE in the HRC Annual Report does it say that Joe Solmonase actually flies first class-or that HRC pays for it. I then provided you with their IRS filing answering that exact question and now you are trying to attack me because it said “On Occasion”. You did not ask me how many times a year he did it, you asked me “Where does it say he does” you were insinuating that he did not fly flirst class and that I was making it up. When I prove that you were wrong, you now are trying to focus on the fact that perhaps he doesn’t ALWAYS fly first class which is irrelevent.
Your problem is, facts don’t matter to you, you are here to defend HRC, first you attack people and ask for facts to back up statements and make-up false scenarios about Joe only using air miles to fly…then when facts are given you ignore this and try to act like I somehow dodged your question by trying to alter the line of discussion.
I really hope you aren’t one of HRC’s “Lobbists” if you are I can see why we aren’t getting anywhere up on the Capital Hill.
Cam
@No. 20 · AndrewW
Andrew, although we often disagree, not here. Thank you for the extra info. I just couldn’t bring myself to wade through the entire document, so congrats on cutting through all the minutia. lol
AndrewW
@Thomas Johnson: If you’re going to be a cheerleader for HRC I think you need some more practice.
Better yet, just email them and ask where all their money goes. They’ll like that.
By the way, are you one of the HRC Black Tie Dinner pimps? Denver?
AndrewW
@Cam: Thanks. Math is math.
KL
I get the disgruntlement over their lobbying efforts… certainly we’d all like to see more than just hates crimes, travel bans, and ENDA passed this year.
However, I don’t see any room for criticizing their non-profit wing, the HRC Foundation. The workplace project really has had significant successes in reaching out to corporate America and pressuring them to treat their employees fairly. 85% of Fortune 500 companies have ENDA clauses now, in part, thanks to their work. The family project, coming out project, and the religion & faith project do significant grassroots work as well.
This movement is starting to get more fractured than the tea party… and many of you would rival them in bitterness as well. Why don’t we focus our anger on getting changes enacted – not on each other.
TONYD
HRC ignores many they profess to represent, particularly racial minorities, and you should get an ear full from the Native American “double spirited” communities about their thoughts about those fools (hint to Queerty)- As small of an Organization as the Native Americans are, I have never seen such a supportive group with follow up and sincere motives. In addition, our heterosexual allies shouldn’t be ignored either- they’re human the last time I checked. I never saw a successful civil rights movement in action that excluded anyone- history has lots to teach us, don’t ignore it, like the HRC foolishly does.
AndrewW
@KL: HRC has a responsibility to demonstrate how effective they are as long as they keep asking for money. I’d like them to figure how and when we can actually win. So far, there is no evidence they even consider that.
AndrewW
@Thomas Johnson:
LGBT Financial Resources to HRC:
2000 – $21.04 million
2001 – $21.36 million
2002 – $28.98 million
2003 – $29.62 million
2004 – $34.17 million
2005 – $35.87 million
2006 – $39.03 million
2007 – $42.00 million
2008 – $43.95 million
2009 – $45.79 million
====================
10Yrs-$341.81 million
In the previous 18 years (1981-1999) HRC received another $172 million.
In 28 years HRC has received +$513 million. Half a billion dollars.
What, besides those “cruising stickers” do we have to show for it? What exactly has HRC accomplished?
Robert
HRC is an organization that relies on the opression of gay people to perpetuate its own existence. It’s all busy work designed to “earn” their paychecks.
TONYD
@AndrewW: T-shirts that fade after one wash, annoying newsletters with useless information that reminds me, “I should have given the money to Project Angel Heart or Colorado AIDS Project or Animal Shelter,” rather than see my money wasted on honoring a reality television D-list douche for saying, “gay” on t.v.
jeffree
I volunteer for a group who provides assistance locally to first-generation college students. They have academic support (tutoring, study skills & mediation to help students navigate the school administration) & counselling (career & personal) & a job board.
Every year measureable goals are set: # students served, # contact hours, retention rate etc…. Twice a year volunteers & donors are up-dated on budgets progress in those goals. Three pages, nothing fancy. When a goal isn’t reached theyre honest, huddle up & figure out what 2 do differently.
It runs on a shoestring budget, but they provide AndrewWs fave word “evidence” that progress is being made & where the $ are going.
I only wish Big Gay Inc–especially HRC would be so honest, open & frugal. Those of us who volunteer or donate supplies, office space, publicity, money get 2 actually can see we make a difference.
How cool would it be if HRC could come close to that?
GranDiva
And that Corporate Equality Index is such bullshit. The criteria they use is unforgivably narrow, and in many cases, overlooks factors over which an evaluated corporation has no control (for example, HRC continues to ding supermarket chains for not extending health coverage to same-sex partners, when those benefits are subject to UNION APPROVAL in collective bargaining, which is to say that the employees themselves are the ones denying those insurance benefits to LGBT employees’ partners). Many of the corporations that get low marks on the HRC index actually do more for their LGBT employees than companies that score higher and that’s not taken into account in any way.
These unbending indices are exactly the kinds of things that had HRC endorsing Alphonse d’Amato, for fuck’s sake!
unsophisticated activist
IF HRC IS SO EFFECTIVE THAN:
1. WHY DOES BARNEY FRANK KEEP SAYING THAT THE LGBT COMMUNITY IS THE WEAKEST LOBBY ON THE HILL?
2. WHY DID THEY NEED PRESIDENT OBAMA TO PROVIDE SO MUCH POLITICAL CAPITAL TO GET HATE CRIMES PASSED?
3. WHY ARE WE STILL SO SHORT OF VOTES ON ENDA, WHICH HAS BEEN DEBATED IN CONGRESS FOR YEARS?
PLEASE DONT SAY THAT LEGISLATION IS COMPLICATED AND TAKES 20 YEARS TO PASS.
IT TOOK 9 WEEKS TO PASS DADT IN 1994 –NO STUDIES, NO WORRIES ABOUT IMPACT OR IMPLEMENTATION
IT TOOK 19 WEEKS TO PASS DOMA IN 1996
SO LESS THAN THIRTY WEEKS TO PASS DISCRIMINATORY AND ANTI-GAY LEGISLATION, BUT OVER 20 YEARS TO PASS EQUALITY LEGISLATION BY THE “NATIONS LARGEST” LOBBY ORG?
Steve
@unsophisticated activist:
1. Because the GLBT lobby is the weakest lobby on the hill.
2. There are far more bigots who hate G&L people, than there are G&L people.
3. See #2.
Hated minorities have never won equal rights or equal protection in Congress. Every such advance has happened in court. We should not expect to win anything in Congress. We should work the courts.
The only thing the congress might do for us, in the forseeable future, would be to confirm some judges who have not already committed to ruling against equal rights for G&L people.
D'oh, The Magnificent
35 million is fucking nuts. 50 million is even more insane. Where do they spend this money?
Ken
The success of lobbyists tends to have a lot to do with the amount of money they have behind them. Lobbyists for oil companies, fincancial, etc. tend to do well because the companies they are representing do billions of dollars in business and are often major contributors to one party or the other.
Lincoln Rose
What HRC also fails to mention is that almost every transgender person who worked for their corporate equality index program jumped ship after they helped strip gender identity from ENDA the last time around.
I don’t know where that leaves that program as far as making sure trans employment rights keep getting looked into at these different businesses.
But really…HRC has long run out of social capital. They’re running on smoke and mirrors like this and hoping we don’t notice the thrill is gone.
AndrewW
@Ken: You said:
“The success of lobbyists tends to have a lot to do with the amount of money they have behind them. Lobbyists for oil companies, fincancial, etc. tend to do well because the companies they are representing do billions of dollars in business and are often major contributors to one party or the other.”
Your examples are related to commerce. The LGBT Community is not in “business.” Lobbying in that domain is like horse-trading, people are negotiating over rules, regulations and contracts. That financial incentive fuels their lobbying efforts.
The difference with LGBT-issues is that positions are based on morality, and therefore non-negotiable. You can lobby super-Baptist Senator Robert Byrd all you want (58 years, so far) and his mind isn’t going to change because he is doing “God’s will.” Over the last 30 years we haven’t lobbied any changed minds or votes in the US Congress. Not a single one.
Because of that reality, it is necessary to ask whether HRC’s lobbying effort is effective or even helpful. I don’t think you change a politician’s mind/vote until it’s in their self interest. That requires that their constituents change their minds. Harold Ford changed his mind simply by moving from an Anti-Gay State – Tennessee, to a Pro-Gay State – New York. HE didn’t change his mind, the constituents did.
HRC believes our equality relies on politics. I believe it relies on understanding. Our fellow citizens need to understand our struggle and join us as a majority that believes in full equality for all. Politicians can’t do that, we must.
Adam Jones
If this is the case why don’t the people who are angry start a letter writing campaign to HRC board members? Solmonese has already said it is up to the board when he is to step down. I imagine if Terry Bean, Hillary Rosen, Bruce Bastian and company started to get 100 -200 letters at their homes or offices detailing how HRC has let down the community they’d suddenly see their ivory towers knocked over and would see their money is being wasted. Most people are on a board for prestige, let them see that prestige erode (or in fact that people think they’re idiotic for being on the board) and you’ll suddenly see the board get active. The board member’s names are public information. It cannot be too hard to find the address for their homes or work place. Especially if you know the state they reside in. You want change? Make the board understand your legitimate concerns without having HRC spoon feed it to them… except you know, it would mean someone having to do some leg work instead of just bitching.
missanthrope
Former HRC employer and insider defends the HRC? Where’s the news here, this looks like a dog-bites-man story.
Paul
@AndrewW: The simple answer is: NEXT to NOTHING
Paul
@GranDiva: I wish they would pay me a few million a year compiling the Corporate Equality Index. It would take me about two to three weeks maximum to gather all the information and write a report.
And I agree with all of your points. The index is flawed in many ways and in those 2-3 weeks I mentioned above I would have all of them ironed out or certainly explained and accounted for.
Geesh, they make it sound like the work they do is rocket science when all it would take is about a group of 10 people to accomplish all of it and more.
I still do not get who is giving them 50 million a year? I mean, I usually require some type of pay off for my hard earned dollars and exactly why I stopped giving to them years ago.
HRC is sucking the GLBTQ community dry and it exists now simply for existing and self preservation as a company. Any company that had their sorry ass trac record would have been put out to pasture decades ago.
Sam
Y’all know I’m a frequent critic of HRC, but I have to say, the corporate equality index does do some good. I know that LGBT groups within large companies have been able to go to their human resources departments, point to a competitor with a higher score and say “Look! Do we really want THEM beating US?!?” And it works. I’ve heard several stories but the one I actually know the facts of was an i-bank who got domestic partner health benefits this way.
AndrewW
@Sam: Most people understand that corporate America has made progress without any influence from HRC.