“It feels wonderful that this is finally over. And I’m glad we could help everybody who needed to be helped.”
That’s Nino Esposito, who’s been in a relationship with Roland Bosee Jr. for almost half a century, discussing the fact that the couple is now on the road to marriage after a year tied up in considerable red tape.
Related: Antigay Evangelicals Are Freaking Out About Trump’s Latest Gay Marriage Flip Flop
Thanks to a Pennsylvania Superior Court ruling on Wednesday, the men’s plight has finally established a precedent for couples in similar situations.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
In 2012, 80-year-old Esposito adopted his 69-year-old partner, and were therefore unable to marry despite being in a relationship since 1970.
The Post-Gazette reports that same-sex couples have used adoption in order to protect inheritances and several other rights before marriage equality became the law of the land.
Once Pennsylvania made same-sex legal in 2014, the couple found themselves in a frustrating snafu: To get married, they’d need to dissolve their adoption, but Allegheny Count Common Pleas Judge Lawrence O’Toole stated that they’d be unable to do so unless fraud was involved.
Related: Australian Cowboy Couple Makes The Case For Marriage Equality
The couple appealed; a logical move considering that other Pennsylvania judges had ruled differently. This led Judge O’Toole to seek guidance from a higher court.
On Wednesday, a three-judge Superior Court panel came to the decision that “under the circumstances of the case, Pennsylvania law permits an unopposed annulment or revocation of an adult adoption.”
President Judge Susan Peikes Gantsman wrote:
Although the Adoption Act does not expressly provide for the annulment of the adult adoption, case law does allow it in certain scenarios; and this case presents wholly new and unique circumstances….
Pennsylvania law regarding same sex marriage [has] changed; same-sex couples in this Commonwealth may now exercise their fundamental right to marry. Therefore, where a same-sex couple, who previously obtained an adult adoption, now seeks to annul or revoke the adoption in order to marry, the Orphans’ court has the authority to annul or revoke the adult adoption.
Andrew Gross and Mikhail Pappas, the attorneys representing the couple, called the ruling “a victory for our clients because it means that they can finally marry each other” and “a victory for same-sex couples throughout Pennsylvania.”
Legal director Vic Walczak said the decision was “a fair and practical ruling that allows gay and lesbian couples who got creative in protecting their interests to [exercise] their constitutional right to marry.”
Esposito calls the decision “a relief.”
“We thought this was a lost cause,” he says. “It took so long, we worried something must be up.”
They plan to marry quietly.
“I’m sure some friends and family will want to do something. But at our age, we’re not worrying about ceremonies.”
GayEGO
This couple were only doing what they had to do to protect their assets. Now that they can legally get married it should nullify their previous adoption.
fur_hunter
This is total proof of the stupid and ridiculous hoops that gays have had to jump through to protect property, bank accounts, 401Ks and the like of their partners. And so many ‘Straights’ just never got it. Marriage is not about a walk down an aisle. It is about LEGAL MATTERS!!! Do you straight people get it now!!!???? Some of you moronic fundamentalists will NEVER get it!
ConcernedParent
Ditto fur_hunter! 🙂
startenout
What a nice story. I am so glad it worked out for them and all the other people in that situation in Pennsylvania. It also fortunately sets an arguable precedent should this situation arise in other states. Bravo, gentlemen and congratulations on your pending nuptials!
Dakotahgeo
@fur_hunter: TEN upvotes! Of course, the term, “moronic fundamentalists”, says it all. Low IQ, home-fool… errr, home SCHOOLED flunk outs!
Carole
Of course the moronic fundamentalists will never get it. To them no gay person should have any rights at all! No amount of explaining will ever help. Their minds simply refuse to understand. But congratulations and “happily ever after” to Nino and Roland!
DMRX
@fur_hunter: They still don’t get it. Stories like this have been part of my explanation for years.
We (same-sex couples) have fought for the legal protections for years. I, for one, never cared what it was called, but the conservatives fought so hard against “civil unions” and whatever else that variations of it had been called, that we finally HAD to use the word marriage because of the legal implications.
Kangol
@Dakotahgeo: But some of the fundamentalists have undergrad and professional degrees, are in positions of high power, etc. Look at Tom Cotton, or Jeff Sessions, etc. One’s a US Senator, the other’s about to become of the Attorney General of the US, and neither one gets or gives a d@mn about what gay people have had to go through!
Terrycloth
I want a loophole but my accountant won’t marry me something about a wife ..being straight yadda yadda