Oscar-nominated actor Sam Elliott, known for his roles in A Star is Born, The Golden Compass and Ghost Rider, has made his feelings known about this year’s acclaimed Oscar-frontrunner, The Power of the Dog.
In a recent interview, Elliot trashed the movie, its preoccupation with homosexuality, and its director Jane Campion. Speaking with the podcast WTF with Marc Maron, Elliott, who has made a career out of playing cowboy roles, labeled the film a “piece of sh*t” for the “evisceration of an American West.”
“All these f*cking cowboys in this movie looked like [chippendale dancers]. They’re running around in chaps and no shirts. There’s all these allusions of homosexuality throughout the f*ckin’ movie,” Elliott seethed.
Related: The Power of the Dog reveals the violence of queer masculinity
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
“I think that’s what the movie is about,” Marron intervened.
That didn’t stop Elliott’s tirade.
“What the f*ck does this woman from down there, New Zealand, know about the American West?” he griped. “And why the f*ck did she shoot this movie in New Zealand and call it Montana?”
He then went on to criticize the lack of families depicted on the Western frontier in the film.
“I mean, Cumberbatch never got out of his fucking chaps. He had two pairs of chaps — a wooly pair and a leather pair. And every f*cking time he would walk in from somewhere — he never was on a horse, maybe once — he’d walk into the fucking house, storm up the f*cking stairs, go lay in his bed in his chaps and play his banjo. It’s like, what the f*ck? Where’s the Western in this Western?”
“I took it personal, pal,” Elliott concluded.
We love Elliott as an actor, and in fairness, he doesn’t seem to have a problem with homosexuality in and of itself, just when someone uses the iconography of the Old West to make a point about homoeroticism in a male-dominated world.
At one point in the interview, he also praised Jane Campion, who is a frontrunner for the Best Director Oscar, claiming that he liked her work, before further deriding her choices on The Power of the Dog.
Elsewhere in the podcast, Elliot also said he “loved” Lady Gaga, which also endears him to us. And his wife, actress Katherine Ross, supported AIDS charities in the 1980s.
But seriously, Sam? Can’t stand the thought of gay cowboys? The myth of the American West is just that… a myth.
Just remember, dude, it’s only a movie.
powersthatbe
Who put 50p in her?
Next.
stan_heck984623462
I love Sam Elliot. This is his opinion and it doesn’t make him a bad man. He did not like the film and he is entitled that opinion. It wasn’t his type of film. Now I loved “The Power of the Dog” but I see his point. Don’t make his comments sound like something its not!! He didn’t like a film and that is all!
Cam
@stan_heck984623462
I love how people still keep trying to claim things aren’t bigoted because “It’s just their opinion”.
Um, yeah, that’s exactly what bigotry is, their opinion.
MarcyMayer
Sam Elliott sounds like a lunatic.
Chaucer
Generally, I hate Westerns because they are so cliche’. This one took a different angle and was authentic. I thought it was excellent. I don’t know why Sam Elliot is so negative. Perhaps it’s homophobia or jealousy. After all, despite his award nominations, I don’t think he’s a good actor. He plays every role as if he’s in the midst of a colonoscopy and has the emotional range from A to B.
Jbaltes
I didn’t find the move particularly engaging. Overall, rather tedious.
Godabed
I guarantee Sam doesn’t know sh*t about Cowboy’s actual history, or the history of gay cowboys. Or how Hollywood took the stories of famous black cowboys and made them all white.
SamB
Clickbait. The title makes it seem like he’s homophobic even though he had a long guest star role on Grace and Frankie… He had a problem with a bad movie, who cares?
Cam
Interesting, you brought in two screenames already to defend him. Hmmm, if the bigoted right wing troll is defending him, makes me think it’s even MORE likely he was being a bigot.
CurtisIsTheOne
CAM, you need to stop your knee jerk reaction to everyone who dares to voice an opinion that differs from yours. To your credit, you didn’t attribute THIS post to that of a name changing homophobic troll, so there’s that. In addition, I also frequently agree with the point of view espoused on MANY of your posts. However, in this instance, you fail to see that human behavior is a bit more nuanced than “Is he homophobic OR does he enthusiastically support LGBTQ+ rights”? I am reluctant to call Sam Elliott a homophobe based on his dislike of a “gay themed” movie. And by the way, I absolutely LOVED “The Power of the Dog” and, despite being an out & proud queer, I totally missed the “gay revenge” theme in the movie although I did like the shirtless “cowboys in chaps” scenes. LOL. And THANKS for standing up to perceived homophobia as often as you do.
Eternal.Cowboy
And the Majorie Taylor Greene of Queerty strikes again. Being on a show with LBTQIA+ characters doesn’t mean someone isn’t homophobic. That doesn’t follow logically. And given the anti-LGBTQIA+ opinions you regularly espouse, I doubt you actually know what homophobic behavior is.
Cam
@CurtisIsTheOne
Hey other troll screename, if you’re going to try to pretend I’m not responding to a Troll account, you probably shouldn’t do it when I’m responding to the screename “SamB” who everyone on here knows is the same old right wing troll that is always here.
As for the “Different Opinion”, here’s a thought, if somebody used the same language as Elliott did to complain about Black people or Asians in a movie, would the same excuses work?
Of course not, but trolls think they can demand LGBTQ people keep offering excuses for straight up bigotry and hate.
Now switch back to the other name so you can attack me.
johncp56
Basic AssHat at this point sorry I use to like him now who knows,
Cam
So Elliott is bitching that a western wasn’t filmed in America?
I guess he forgot that the term “Spaghetti Western” was coined because so many of them were filmed in Italy.
LeavingPhilly
A narrative film is not a representation of reality. The inability to see a different representation of the Western, directed by a woman and with queer themes, is typical toxic masculinity. Also, just because you act in Westerns doesn’t give you ownership of the genre or how someone subverts it. Fool.
CurtisIsTheOne
You’re a toxic person attacking Sam Elliott just because he didn’t work in a movie with John Wayne, a real “man’s man” who accurately portrayed “real cowboys”. John Wayne was a “sensitive” man who had a very nuanced manner of acting that you dandy-pants folks can’t understand or enjoy. Give me a”real” man….like Rock Hudson or Jim Neighbors or Mr. Rogers any day of the week….except Thursday which every historian of San Francisco knows was reserved for queers who wore green if they were “Friends of Dorothy”.
barryaksarben
The westerns of old hollywood were as far from reality as any movies EVER. Many cowboys were POC and many were gay. To say otherwise is just lying. It doesnt matter if he liked the film or not but to act offended that there were gay people in the west. Being a cowboy was a lonely life and alot of loners and people leaving their old lives behind. Yes, there were families but they were setttlers not cowboys
MrMichaelJ
I don’t really see this as him dissing homosexuality but as him dissing a movie he thought was horrible all around. He seemed to have more issues with chaps being worn 24/7 and cowboys looking more like exotic dancers then, you know, cowboys.
Personally I thought the movie was beyond cringeworthy. Unless the actor who played the effeminate gay guy is actually an effeminate gay man it’s not going to be long before we look at that portrayals and cringe. Personally, it bothers me we have two portrayals of gay men and I’m not sure which is worse. Whether it’s the gay man who hates being gay or the “sissy” gay boy. They’re generic portrayals and while I have no issue with effeminate gay men (albeit I may just be one too) it seems the stereotype is played up way more than the sexually confident and attractive gay male.
BGreen1963
Who was the sexually confident man in this movie? Clearly it was the boy who grew ino a man in this movie.
fingertrouble
The funny thing? An ACTOR who starred in some Westerns is now acting like he’s an expert on history of the Wild West.
…Yeah, come back with a doctorate and some papers and we’ll talk.
BGreen1963
As usual, the truth is in the middle. I’ve always liked Sam Elliot, but he clearly missed the point of this movie. And he made some fair criticisms about choices in the movie. He might want to invite some gay friends over to explain what the movie means and why it’s important. This movie was more subtle & nuanced than almost any Western ever made. I think Sam let some white hetero privilege show. Do better Sam.
CurtisIsTheOne
Number G-9. BINGO. You wins the “intranet award of the day”.
BigRedEO
Awwwww, Sam, you just went and ruined my opinion of you with that toxic masculinity tirade.
kalyphas
I believe that in an interview Mr. Elliott has gone on record saying that “I have no use for gay people.”
Donston
Tolerance doesn’t equate to acceptance or embracing. About half of overt male homophobes talk about how much they don’t have an issue with whoever. It doesn’t mean much. To many of them “not having an issue” simply means that they can be cordial.
Anyways, I’m not a big fan of The Power Of The Dog. Not a bad movie, but one that isn’t nearly as nuanced or challenging as it could have been. This is 2022. That type of hyper “ambiguous” storytelling isn’t really progressive anymore. I’m also just tired of this constant need to reconstruct the western. It’s a dead genre for a reason. However, there’s definitely an underlining of gay panic/discomfort and misogyny in his rant. And it’s not difficult to decipher. It’s not just about not liking the film. But as usual, a lot of the crowd here loves defending casual homophobia and “straight presenting”/hetero/hetero-leaning males.
SamB
kalyphas: Nasty thing to say without proof. I looked and haven’t found anything to back you up.
tjack47
Beef. It’s what’s for dinner.
truebluejoe
ha…good one
Ed R.
Sam always reminded me of a lost member of The Village People… And after starring in the gay friendly Mask with Cher, and A Star is Born with Gaga, you’d think he’d be a little more open to the lifestyle..?
mash19
I wonder what he thought of “Brokeback Mountain!
MOE-X
“Dick…it’s what’s for dinner.” He’ll be ok poor thing, one of those shirtless cowboys got Daddy all hot n bollered.
SDR94103
are you mad, dude?
Ken A.
I think he is saying, even gay cowboys aren’t like that. I have not seen the movie, but the west isn’t portrayed true to form, it’s glamorized and Hollywood eviscerated. He’s no homophobe, he’s just saying the west is rough, cowboys work hard and don’t look like toy boys. Though some do in a rustic sort of way. Queerty trying to stir up drama again.
Donston
Almost none of these western movies reflect the actual west. It’s all American mythology. And there’s been plenty of films that have played around with that mythology. There are definitely things to criticize about TPOTD, but not being “realistic” is a thing to point out. The movie’s aim isn’t realism, and almost no westerns are realistic. And yes, his comments are homophobic. There’s no other way to frame them. He was clearly uncomfortable with the allusion of “gayness” in what he perceives as something that’s supposed to be a “rough”, hyper masculine and hetero genre.
Donston
Also, him whining that she didn’t know about the west because she’s from New Zealand was just dumb. Some of the most popular westerns are from non-American filmmakers. Many non American filmmakers helped to craft the western genre. While Hollywood turned the west in mythos. None of that shit was real. This movie actually has a more realistic depiction of what that time and era was like than most westerns.
Whatever criticisms there are to make about this movie, his comments were still condescending and dripping with gay panic and misogyny.
BGreen1963
If you haven’t seen the movie then how do you think you are qualified to have an opinion in this? You make yourself seem foolish.
cubcmh
I realize he was probably always this “ignernt,” and previously did a better job of hiding.
But it seems there’s a trend with celebs: they can afford to spew their vile thoughts publicly, even if they get cancelled and never work again. They’ve made their millions.
Sometimes I wish the Internot/social media was never invented. In the “dark ages” (before the Internet) we’d hardly ever hear the ramblings of a bigot. Now the idiots can publish their hate instantaneously.
nmharleyrider
What did he think happened when you had 50 cowboys in their bunkhouse? I was going to watch for Cumberbatch as he is a marvelous actor; now I need to watch it sooner lol.
truebluejoe
do! It’s a great film and all actors are superb.
Diplomat
If you’re into watching the pot that never boils, or molasses slowly pouring out a jar, you’ll love it.
BGreen1963
Diplomat, apparently you didn’t understand the amazing ending.
Diplomat
I felt the whole movie was slow moving uneventful no spark with a meek ending that lacked ambition.
Mack
Years ago I read something that he said that gave me the impression that he was homophobic and this reminded me of it.
Personally I wasn’t that thrilled with the movie myself but that’s me. I don’t really don’t care of some did or didn’t like the movie, everyone has their own taste.
Mario Golden
A narcissistically cryptic and utterly annoying movie made by a self-absorbed director, with a dull storyline featuring highly neurotic privileged white people: a supposed Harvard graduate somehow turned imbecile gay-closeted cowboy (not in the least believable), a frail well-to-do woman on the verge of hysteria (again?!), and potentially a young gay sociopath in the making (a stereotype if there ever was one) — I mean the kid. Jesse Plemmons’ character was the best developed and only one that made any sense at all, and as I see it he gave the absolute best performance in the film.
Bob Amsel
Mr. Reddish, Katharine Ross spells her first name just as Katharine Hepburn did — two a’s and one e. Otherwise, I enjoyed your comments and found Sam Elliott’s rant very sad. He may be old now but not old enough to have LIVED in the Old West, although his technical comments on clothing are probably valid.
Rocinante
I love Westerns; I grew up on them (Bonanza, Big Valley, Wild,Wild West, Gunsmoke) and as a little kid; my parents couldn’t get me out of my boots and cowboy outfits. In my older years I really can’t stand Westerns pre 70s. I’ve probably watched Josie Wales 20x since I was a kid. That and Long Riders were the best Westerns I’ve seen from that era. The more recent Westerns have drastically improved the genre by making them a bit more realistic. I suspect that “The Power of the Dog’s” challenge with a certain segment of our society is that it deals with issues that did exist and challenges their screwed up and fictional view of the “Old West”.
I also love good and even mediocre gay themed movies. I started watching the Dog movie because of the rave reviews on NPR. I couldn’t get into it; probably just was my mood that day as the story; including the gay angle I heard about sounds very interesting. I also have always appreciated the characters Sam Elliot has brought us over the years and because of that and his age I’m willing to write his complaints off as those founded in the natural surliness, age and change brings with it.
With that said; my willingness to forgive his apparent homophobia is probably due to just finishing 1883. He was spectacular in that series and the series did an amazing job of showing the level of difficulty and danger people faced while traveling across the country via wagon train. After watching that I’d like to see more Westerns being made using our more accurate historical accounts modern movies have brought to the table. By the way I think I cried for 1/2 of the last episode of 1883. Faith Hill and Tim McGraw we’re surprisingly good actors. I will be watching “The Power of the Dog” this week. I’ve never seen a Cumberbatch movie I didn’t like.
SFMike
Sam doesn’t seem to realize that the goal of the Academy is to crown a woman best director this year and the movie, it’s subject matter and entertainment value is secondary to that goal. The Academy Awards have made themselves irrelevant as they have become nothing more than a vehicle to showcase how diverse and politically correct this icon of the Hollywood elite has become. It’s all BS and a platform of serious misandry and getting even for all those who feel they were abused by the film industry in one way or the other. The fact that they don’t deem it necessary to present live the awards for film editing, makeup/hairstyling, original score, production design, animated short, live action short and sound, all the things that actually count and makeup the art of filmmaking shows their disdain for celebrating the actual creative process of filmmaking and instead focus on how politically correct they are with two female hosts as further proof their inclusiveness. Sadly, it’s all become a grim unentertaining slog that understandably has lost the public interest it once held.
Donston
This reads like someone who hasn’t actually watched the movie. Also, TPOTD was always gonna be a big awards contender. Its tone, subject matter, the people involved and it being a relatively weak year for movies set it up nicely. No other films really have enough acclaim and momentum. And despite not liking the movie that much, it’ll still be a better Best Picture winner than many flicks that have won over the last twenty years. While the academy has always been driven by sociology and politics and economics and campaigning. If you think it hasn’t then you’re naive, and you have some rather rose-tinted glasses concerning the past.
There’s nothing wrong with being critical of this movie. But one of the reasons this site has become a wasteland for old, bitter, ignorant queers is just how unabashedly hateful and misogynistic and accepting of casual homophobia the comment section is.
Texasholdem
A woman won the award last year.
mujerado
Great, another conspiracy theory. Campion is a front-runner, so it must be that Hollywood is out to award a woman director no matter how good the film is. It couldn’t be that you just don’t agree she’s the best director this year. The thousands of Academy members (9,921 as of 2020) must be having secret meetings to make sure she wins. Go watch cartoons.
Jim
I’m a bit amused how soooo many people do not realize that the Oscar’s are and have never been about excellence but promoting the film industry and Hollywood.
nm4047
Well at least he got to the end of the film (I assume) to make his opinion known, better than me, not a film that I will put on my want to see again list
Joshooeerr
Whatever you think of The Power of the Dog (and it won’t be to everyone’s taste), complaining about the “lack of families” and the depiction of homosexuality in the Wild West is just too hilarious. Men outnumbered women in frontier America by about nine to one. Families were a conspicuously rare thing. And where women are absent men, however “straight”, are going to find alternative sexual outlets. What’s amazing is not that one single solitary film should allude to this, but that several decades of westerns have studiously ignored it. Also, The Power of the Dog is hardly a gay romp; it’s more about what we might now call toxic masculinity. Cumberbatch’s character has homoerotic feelings about another cowboy that leave him tortured and twisted, and he takes out his self-hatred on a boy who seems more obviously “fem” and therefore an affront to the masculine ideals of the West. Elliot really couldn’t be more wrong.
Donston
It’s just really weird to criticize the movie for not being “realistic”, whether you like it or not. It’s far more realistic than most westerns. His comments clearly weren’t just about not caring for the film. He’s angry that it doesn’t reflect what he feels are the conventions of the “traditional western” as well as being bitter about its attack on toxic masculinity, its gay undertones and it being directed by a female. There’s a lot of fair criticism towards this movie, but his “critique” just came off like old, embittered, “straight” white man stuff.
BGreen1963
Agreed!
truebluejoe
Nailed it!
dbmcvey
Too bad. I’ve always liked Sam Elliot. I hate to hear him talking like this.
JRamonMc
Sam Elliott has always been a fine actor and highly respected in Hollywood. I don’t always have to agree with someone’s personal viewpoint in order to appreciate their craft. Clearly he has no problem with our community, he just wasn’t buying into a genre western. We all have our limits to what’s believable, and this movie for him is where he chose to draw the line. No harm, no foul as far as I’m concerned.
Just.my.opinion
POWER OF THE DOG is a horrible movie. It should never have been made. It certainly does not deserve any awards.
stan_heck984623462
His opinion is not bigoted. He did not like the film that’s all. If he did not like “The Color Purple” or “Dreamgirls” would you call him a racist? His opinion was he did not like the film. Just because someone has a different opinion than you that does mean they are wrong and you are right!
gregg2010
In college Sam played Big Jule in a production of “Guys and Dolls.” Really, Sam needs to take a chill pill and remember all his gay cast members from stage and films.
KellyRobinsonJr
Id he only knew how much he has invested in my Spank Bank…
dirtypierre
He wasn’t too afraid to be a thirst trap on “The Ranch” when he ran into the scene in a t shirt and tighty whities. And in “Lifeguard” a brainless movie that exploited that porn stache and hairy chest. Stupid dick.
IWantAFullBeard
He didn’t say anything bad about homosexuals. He simply made the point that they are portraying the American West as a theme night at the White Party. Whether or not this is true (I didn’t see the movie) is his opinion. It really does no one any service to publicize the authors lack of reading comprehension and attempt to smear someone for holding an opinion.
stan_heck984623462
Exactly!
Kevan1
I used to be a fan, now he can rot.
scotty
considering he played a guy that killed hitler and then the bigfoot, i think he got stuck in that role. jeez man, just abide already.
mateo
So let me understand this: We, as gay people, are automatically expected to defend a film just because it’s gay themed? We’re supposed to be all up in arms because “Brokeback Mountain was ROBBED” at the Oscars? For the record, I thought that “Call Me By Your Name” was crap. Never have I watched a movie where there was so LITTLE chemistry between the two main characters. Never. And so now this movie comes along and we’re all supposed to be fawning over it? I puposely haven’t watched it because I’m not a fan of Jane Campion. “The Piano”, while having an interesting premise, was–IMHO–extremely flawed. So I’ve decided not to watch “The Power of the Pooch”. Burn me at the stake, already.
splunky
Good lord, who pissed in your cheerios today? Maybe you (as well as half of the commenters here) should calm the hell down, then read the article in its entirety before deciding to pop off.
cuteguy
Anyone wonder if this Sam Elliot is going senile? He’s not that old but he’s definitely off his rocker.
truebluejoe
Boys!! Stop. You are BOTH pretty!
All of Life is perception. The very business of Hollywood is an illusion of romance, mystery, escape. It is, on this Oscar level…ART.
An entertainment. A business that combines elements, both tried and true, tested for quality and popularity. It is a real soup of perceptions; the writer, the director, the cinematographer, the actor, the scenic designer, etc. And most importantly, the audience.
Within this mix we here observe the western. A staple of Hollywood since The Sqaw Man.
Not a documentary on cattle drives, this is a look at 1925 and a more modern West with change in the air. A psychological study of a tortured man whose world is spinning out of his control as he lashes out at changes he cannot control. And all the time harboring the secret of his homosexuality, so at odds with life on the ranch.
Now, this is an operatic telling of a tragedy. As such, I personally don’t expect gunslingers, saloon gals, nor beans around a campfire. What I find is vast vistas, high drama, evil and murder. The “weak” man avenging the cruelty to his mother with wits, not brawn. Both men gay, but only one living his truth. And Truth is triumphant.
A rain barrel of fun this is not. But a brilliant film it is. I’ve long been fan of Sam Elliott and I still am. But I also think it stretches the bounds of credulity to believe that the dust of the cattle drive didn’t conceal a few fairys. Puhleez! We-Are-Everywhere.
LunaSol2010
When the west was not populated with available women there are photos of dances with men at bars in Nevada and Montana. It was the way men survived, pairing off.
It was really expensive to get a mail order bride and like many species, men had to adapt to survive.
I am sure it was hard on the men. No pun intended. And very comucated for the first several hundred woman who moved west.
So 35% black cowboys, and gay sex were the realities we know are recorded with documentation and first hand accounts.
And what Sam finds sacred is a lack of knowledge or a reality if the impact of his comments on others … especially the cast crew and director of Power of the Dog.
inbama
Awarding this man-hating film anything will not undo the REAL Oscar bigotry of passing over “Brokeback Mountain” in 2006.
Jim
Poor Sam! His identity is sooo based on the being ruff and tough.
Let’s face it those rough and tough cowboys of old gave each other a poke when they weren’t in town.
Let’s get real Sam
doraglasberg
There is NOTHING wrong with not liking a film – but his reasons were definitely homophobic.
Polaro
Were they really?
doraglasberg
Poor Sam, doesn’t like Throw Pillows in the bunkhouse
J W G
One of the first things I found out when it was becoming apparent I liked other boys (aside from the church yelping it was a sin) was homosexuality is as old as civilization itself. I am sure there was much ‘hanky panky’ out there where the deer and the buffalo roam. But it was something never talked about, admitted or even really identified. It was ‘the love that dare not speak it’s name’ We have a tendency to inject our contemporary values and morals into history and it makes me roll my eyes too. The issue is very popular now, gayness is very fashionable. Writers are attempting to put a popular issue into history. But one hundred and fifty years ago if you were messing around with another man under the chuck wagon (and I wouldn’t doubt it) you kept that sort of thing way under your cowboy hat.
Polaro
He didn’t like the movie. That’s fair. He thought it to be an unrealistic view of history. He’s probably right, many movies aren’t though. Pretty sure historical accuracy was not a focus of the movie. So what? It wasn’t for Sam. I don’t go to Sam for movie reviews, and it does not affect my regard for his acting.
It does makes me want to watch the movie more now though. So there is that.
Karlis
As Bill Maher (whom I no longer watch because he’s turned into a contrarian curmudgeon) would put it: Whiny. Little. Bitch.
Ronbo
Who really cares enough about a movie to suggest that if you didn’t like it you must be made an enemy? This is an attempt by our own “cancel culture” to make an enemy of a person who has been supportive of the community. Queerty works much too hard trying to make enemies. If you need an enemy to define yourself, David Reddish, look in the mirror. Dividing the community hurts the community.
Sam didn’t like the movie. I found the movie very uncomfortable at first; but, it hooked me and had my full attention to the end.
Sam is no enemy; the real enemy are people who demand
searchcz
Sam Elliot knows that The Power of The Dog isn’t a documentary, right? It isn’t even “about” the American west.
carllonghorn
Thank you – some of these folks are making comments about the Old West like the movie took place in the mid to late 1800’s. In fact, the movie takes place in 1925 Montana. But really it could have been situated anywhere at anytime, using a similar premise of toxic masculinity and repressed feelings of homosexuality and how it can play out in violent ways. That’s what the movie is about – it is not a western per se. I think many people expected this movie to be about something it is not and came away disappointed. It is not for everyone. To me, the real question is whether the young man is a sociopath or not, or did he do what he did to protect his mother and is really heroic.
inbama
Not only is creepy Peter a sociopath, but you can be sure that with Phil out of the picture, his lush of a mother found some other reason to keep on drinking.
JB
He seems to be a little too obsessed with chaps.
IanHunter
Is he mad that he didn’t get the part in the movie, or that The Ranch sucks.
humble charlie
“It wasn’t a western. Then why was I watching it?” Humpadong Cassidy.