|
|
|
We woke up far too late and hung over yesterday to enjoy the weekly bliss that is The Sunday edition of The New York Times, so we were just doing a bit of catching up and came across this piece from The Magazine. In it, Elizabeth Weil explores the myriad debates surrounding intersex babies, those little bundles of joy born with both male and female traits. Should they be given so-called corrective surgery? What are the consequences of such surgery? Why, as a society, do we feel the need to eliminate the gendered middle-ground? Etc. Etc. Definitely an interesting read; although, in grand magazine style, quite lengthy. We recommend you use your office's resources and print it out for later. Can't have you getting fired, now can we? (And, yes, we used the same Christoph Nieman image from the story itself. How could we resist?) |
|
We get a lot of flack for not being bubbly and pro-gay all the time. Most recently, we were called a "low-lives." We assure you, we're not low-lives, just low-brow. But, here's some proof we're not totally heartless bastards: a recent article in The New York Times brought a little tear to our eye. |
|
|
|
Always seemingly late in the game, The New York Times is only now focusing on straight women married to gay men. Did these reporters screen Brokeback Mountain only yesterday? The article mentions Jim McGreevey and his wife as well as Rock Hudson's sham of a marriage. But we thought the most interesting part was this mention about a husband and wife team who stay together solely for companionship reasons.
Someone please forward a copy of this article to Katie Holmes. Many Couples Must Negotiate Terms of 'Brokeback' Marriages [NY Times] |