Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  settlements

You’ve Got 4 Weeks to Claim eHarmony Didn’t Let You Hunt for Same-Sex Matches (And Win Free Money!)

Well, it’s not “free” money. The “up to $4,000 per individual class member” is payment for actual damages California members of eHarmony suffered as a result of the dating site’s refusal to make gay matches. As we’ve been reporting on, the class action suit Cardin v. eHarmony is settled; now it’s time to find the victims.

So long as “you attempted to use the eharmony.com website to be matched with an individual of the same sex but were denied the opportunity to do so at any time between May 31, 2004 and January 25, 2010, and were a resident of California at the time of your attempt, you may be a member of the Settlement Class entitled to make a claim from the Claim Fund.” That means up to four-large is yours, but probably less. It also means that in order to claim the cash, you have to acknowledge you thought eHarmony would be the place for gays to find love. Which is still isn’t. (That’s what sister site CompatiblePartners.net is for, silly.)

Find details about filing a claim here. But remember this: You must be gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Yes, it says that in the settlement agreement.

Oh, it never felt so good to be queer, did it?

(Thanks, Nat!)

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Feb 25, 2010
Tagged: , , ,
5 Comments

No. 1 · dontblamemeivotedforhillary · Member · 805 comments

Straights hate the dating site so why would gays want to even join?

Posted: Feb 25, 2010 at 1:02 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Dave

Too bad for those damn perjury laws, I live in CA.

Posted: Feb 25, 2010 at 2:37 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · me

Why can’t MA or MI be included on this???

Posted: Feb 25, 2010 at 6:03 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Mike in Asheville, nee "in Brooklyn"

Okay, so does Neil Clark Warren creep anyone else as much as he gives me the creeps? Admittedly I don’t need the service (ball-and-chained for 24 years), but he is way too creepy for me to even browse that site.

One thing I still don’t understand is why eHarmony must provide dating services for anyone they don’t want to. It is not like they are a restaurant or hotel or public accommodation required to not discriminate, they are a private dating service. Its been 5+ years, but I certainly would not wanted viewing potential matches on Manhunt/M4M etc. displaying women and straight men.

Posted: Feb 25, 2010 at 8:51 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Cam

The one problem being….each person gets about $4000, but the lawyer who broght this suit gets about 2 million.

Posted: Feb 25, 2010 at 10:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY