A jury just awarded $18.4 million to a man after his doctors failed to test him for HIV, which later developed into AIDS.
48-year-old Sean Stentiford originally consented to an HIV test back in 2007 after a resident told him he was demonstrating symptoms that were “highly suggestive of HIV infection.”
Neurologist Kinan Hreib disagreed with the resident’s assessment, however, and cancelled the test. But he never bothered telling Stentiford.
When Stentiford later returned to learn the results, internist Stephen Southard told him everything “looked good”, which Stentiford interpreted as meaning the test came back negative.
Three years later, another doctor recommended he get tested. That test came back positive. By then, the disease had progressed to AIDS, causing Stentiford brain damage and cognitive impairment that ultimately ended his career as a lawyer.
“He had a brilliant future in front of him,” his lawyer David Angueira told the jury. “They literally cut the legs out from under him.”
“He lost his job. He lost his career. He lost his life.”
After an emotional eight-day trial in a US District Court, the jury ultimately determined that Southard and Hreib were both negligent in their caring of Stentiford and caused him further injury.
The panel also found that a third doctor, Daniel P. McQuillen, an infectious disease specialist, was also negligent, but his actions didn’t cause Stentiford harm.
Related: Insurance provider slapped with class-action lawsuit after outing 12,000 patients taking HIV meds
Juanjo
I’m curious to know how a doctor canceled a test without having examined the patient or discussed the test with the patient. Not to mention outright lying about the results of a test never given.
NateOcean
“They literally cut the legs out from under him.”
literally?
Wayne_in_NYC
NateOcean, you didn’t hear that the definition of “literally” was rewritten by Kelly Anne Conway and her boss? Literally can be “alternative facts” now.
Chrisk
Wouldn’t saying “literally getting his head chopped off” or something be more suited for his case though. Brain damage and all.
Chrisk
Not that the hospital doesn’t deserve it but I imagine it’s pretty tough to disprove mental decline brought from the diagnosis. You could pretty much say whatever was ailing you at that point and get whatever your heart wanted. The jury was going to side with the lawyer in this case.