
When marriage equality rains, marriage equality pours. On the heels of the Iowa Supreme Court affirming marriage equality and Vermont's legislature overcoming the governor's veto to legalizing same-sex marriage, our nation's capital makes some in-roads: Washington D.C. will recognize same-sex marriages from any state where it's legal.
The city already grants civil unions to same-sex couples. Now, if you're a gay couple married in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Iowa, or Vermont, you'll be entitled to the same rights as straight married couples in D.C. The D.C. Council today passed a bill granting those rights, reports WaPo.
The initial vote was 12-0. The unanimous vote sets the stage for future debate on legalizing same-sex marriage in the District and a clash with Congress, which approves the city's laws under Home Rule. The council is expected to take a final vote on the legislation next month.
Council member Jim Graham (D-Ward 1), who is gay, called the amendment a matter of "basic fairness."
The city's laws on same-sex unions have been murky, he explained. Couples ask, he said, "Is my marriage valid in D.C.? For years now, it has not been clear."
"It's high time we send a clear, unequivocal message to those persons of the same sex and married in another jurisdiction that their marriage is valid in D.C.," said Graham, who added, "I hope this city recognizes this is a human rights struggle."
Council member David A. Catania (I-At Large), who is also gay, predicted it was only a matter of time before the council also takes up a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the District. "It's no secret that I have been working on legislation that would take us further," he said. "This is the march toward human rights and equality. This is not the march toward special rights. This is the equal march and that march is coming here."
Adam Lambert: Out Magazine Can Eat Shit + Die (149)
· David Ehrenstein says: “I’m curious what your beef is with that?” Yeah, you would... »
· Recession watcher says: Time for a new editor, but it will be impossible to find one with ethics... »
· Ethan says: Petty arguments do nothing. From the Angry at Adam Lambert Reader POINTS TO PONDER (No... »
The Ridiculous Catholic Manifesto Pledging to Ignore Gay Marriage + Abortion Laws (19)
· Brian NJ says: They can make all the declarations they like. They started this fight and we are... »
Is Rudy Giuliani Gunning for Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s Seat? (6)
· Robert, NYC says: George, don’t be fooled by the liberal label of NYS. It isn’t once you... »
Why Didn’t Anyone Buy Window Media’s Gay Newspapers? (9)
· DEEPTHROAT says: The IRS. »
Why Won’t Mike Rogers Support Outing Gay Catholic Priests? (9)
· Dan James says: Having almost been one myself, and being married to an ex-priest, I can tell you... »
· Robert, NYC says: Keith, Lucas, I’m totally for that. I’m sick and tired of these closet... »
Putin Looks For Gay Love (5)
· Medvedev says: Putin is a real gay. See this sensational picture: http://www.larrytt.com... »
Window Media’s Demise Can Be Blamed on Its Leaders, Not the Marketplace (33)
· san marco says: You say like they did not know who they marry. »
That's not possible. It's a well known fact that black folk hate gay folk. Check the gay handbook.
@The Gay Numbers:
yeah, but puh-lenty of black gay folks in DC, though…
sounds like they are testing the congressional waters
Chitown:
Not possible. Gay and black are mutually exclusive. No gays are blacks. No blacks are gays. Check the gay and black handbooks.
Best regards,
Gay Numbers
@The Gay Numbers:
LOL!