The Dykes on Bikes can continue to ride with pride:
The U.S. Supreme Court today turned down a Dublin lawyer's challenge to a San Francisco group's trademark right to the name Dykes on Bikes.The high court declined to hear an appeal by attorney Michael McDermott of a ruling by a federal circuit court in Washington D.C. in July upholding the trademark granted by the U.S. Trademark Office.
The group, also known as the San Francisco Women's Motorcycle Contingent, won the right to the name in 2004.
The bikers traditionally lead the annual San Francisco Pride Parade and describe themselves as supporting women motorcyclists around the world as well as gay rights endeavors.
McDermott, who challenged the trademark as an individual acting on his own behalf, said today he considers the Dykes on Bikes name to be "hostile to men."
Vroom-vroom.
Adam Lambert: Out Magazine Can Eat Shit + Die (196)
· Charlie says: Mon, we don’t need another gay singer. These singers are held in as much... »
· Ethan says: StacieGirlie I hate to be the one to point this out but and perhaps you already know... »
For Her Big Return, Janet Jackson Returns to Her Entire Past (13)
· arnau says: never been a big fan of her (liked some tunes of “the velvet rope” but... »
Guess Which Escort Abuser Is Headed to Big Brother? (5)
· terrwill says: Probably is a shrewd move on Boy G’s part. This will expose (pardon the pun)... »
· Tommy says: I agree dontblamemeivotedforhilla ry. I think LaToya Jackson and coolio were on that... »
Is It Wrong to Report on a Marine Starring in Hardcore Gay Porn? (71)
· terrwill says: Hey Queerty People: How come my post #70 was edited?????? »
· terrwill says: MY GOD! A lot of these queens have a bunch ‘o bees in their bonnets!! A few... »
PHOTOS: He RSVPd With His Eyes (43)
· prodigi says: He should FIRE at least one of his photographers. For incompetent Photoshopping, and... »
Why Is White Collar’s Matthew Bomer’s Sexuality Such a Secret? (135)
· The Narcissist says: No. 131 ยท Diana A. News Flash! Women still lust after good looking men,... »
“Did any provision in the Constitution guarantee a right to homosexual sodomy?” (38)
· Rainfish says: @ #34 1EqualityUSA: I don’t mean to keep “bursting your bubbles”... »
The subject line's wrong — it was a trademark lawsuit, not copyright. They're not the same things.