» Taking Sides…
"Two years after they were swept into office, most new U.S. House and Senate Democrats have made good on their pledges to back gay rights. Nearly 60 percent of freshmen House Democrats and all but one of the freshmen Senate Democrats scored 85 or higher on the Human Rights Campaign Congressional Scorecard released last week. The scorecard also shows that nine of the 41 scored freshmen House Democrats earned perfect marks. Five of the nine scored freshmen Senate Democrats and independents received perfect scores." [Washington Blade] |
|
Hoping to scare voters away from former Governor Ronnie Musgrove, Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker began running this ad tying Musgrove, who wants Wicker's seat, to all sorts of "liberal" groups, like Friend of Hillary and pro-choice NARAL. And, of course, to gay rights group Human Rights Campaign, which is represented in the commercial by the Village People. Too bad Musgrove never took money from HRC, a fact of which Wicker obviously doesn't care… [via Towleroad] |
|
HRC, LCR and NSD, Oh My!
A website called Boycott HRC last week reported that a "reliable source" told them HRC had donated $10,000 to the LCR, while giving none to the National Stonewall Democrats. TransAdvocate, meanwhile, published an email purportedly sent from NSD co-chair Steve Driscoll to executive director Jon Hoadley, among others. In this email, Driscoll derides HRC for their "high-handedness" at the 2004 Democratic National Convention and gripes that the organization had been stonewalling discussions on a possible 2008 collaboration. |
|
|
|
McCain Offers Immediate Attack
Barack Obama announced last night that he's picked Delaware Senator Joe Biden as his running mate. Biden, who previously attempted to throw the press off track, brings 35 of Senatorial experience to Obama's ticket. And, thanks to his seat on the Foreign Relations Committee, first hand international policy knowledge, which will help even Obama's odds against John McCain. |
|
Frank, Human Rights Campaign and others have been busy hashing out the ever-contentious Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and the latest controversy has nothing to do with trans inclusion, which has derailed discussions in the past. No, this latest brouhaha revolves around another hot-button topic: marriage. A little-discussed provision of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) would allow employers to give health insurance coverage and other benefits to married opposite-sex couples and deny those same benefits to the partners of their gay and lesbian employees who are legally married in Massachusetts and California. Before people start burning effigies, however, Frank's quick to point out that he personally did not add the language. It is, however, necessary, he says: "It was the decision of the committee and of everybody else, myself, Tammy, was that we couldn't pass anything without this…We had to make it clear that non-discrimination in employment had no effect on marriage one way or another." |
» Words…
"I come before you today to ask that you once again include strong support for the rights of GLBT people in the Democratic platform, and increase the range of support from the 2004 platform, by explicitly supporting the equality and dignity of transgender people… We ask that the platform continue to support equal rights, benefits and responsibilities for gay and lesbian couples and to oppose any effort to amend the U.S. Constitution to define marriage." - HRC Legislative Director Allison Hewitt testifying today to the DNC's platform drafting committee. [HRC] |
» "Accosted"
A 63-year old lesbian who attended HRC's boycotted dinner in San Francisco this weekend found herself manhandled and booted for trying to distribute protest literature. Said Catherine Cusic, "At this point 2-3 large men accosted me. I don’t remember their exact words but I quietly said that I had bought a ticket and had the right to be there. I began to place printed material on a table when I was grabbed roughly by at least 2 men (who I think were behind me). One of them put my right arm in an armlock behind my back and up and bent my right wrist with tremendous force.". [Towleroad] |
|
The Human Rights Campaign is on the frontlines of the fight for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights and I fully support its important mission at this critical moment in history. And peace shall reign… |
|
The non-profit caused a rift last year when it supported a non-inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act after vowing to fight for trans inclusive measure. Even after the group apologized and promised to right its wrongs, some queer activists still aren't feeling the HRC love. And they're fighting back. |
» Well-Deserved Self-Congratulations.
HRC press release title: "After Discussions with Human Rights Campaign, Mars Inc. Pulls Controversial Ad." That would be the instantly infamous flamboyant jogger Snickers ad in which Mister T, of all people, tells him to "Get some nuts.". [HRC] |
|
HRC came under fire last year after flip-flopping on an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act. After vowing to fight for trans rights, the non-profit did an about face and began pushing for a gays-only version of the legislation. Now, months later, the after shocks are being felt in San Francisco, where two of the city's gay politicos have vowed to boycott HRC's annual dinner next month: On Tuesday, San Francisco Supervisors Tom Ammiano and Bevan Dufty introduced a resolution at City Hall calling for a bill that includes transgender people and recognizing the boycott. HRC has continuously defended last year's queer stance an claim they "exhausted every resource" to do the right thing. They were forced, they say, to fight for what they could get. Too bad they ended up fighting their own kind. So, what's the moral of the story? If you're going to claim to be the nation's largest, most important queer non-profit, don't act so "gay." |
|
Flamers on! |
» Finances…
"[Human Rights Campaigns' leaders] made contributions to their favorite candidates during the primary race, and as expected by many independent gay pundits, the top recipient of their contributions was the other HRC, Senator Clinton. The presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, received nothing from the HRC leaders." Human Rights Campaign endorsed Obama last week. [Petrelis Files] |
» Biting.
The New York Post's David Benkof ain't about the gay marriage battle: "The Human Rights Cam paign, America's largest gay-rights group, recently announced plans to spend at least a half-million dollars to defeat the California Marriage Protection Act. What a waste; gays and lesbians have far more urgent needs. The Golden State constitutional amendment poses no substantive threat to them - it will take nothing away from same-sex couples but the word "marriage." Even if HRC wants Californians to vote no on the initiative, $500,000 is a lot to spend on a struggle to retain an unpopular court victory that's only semantic and symbolic." [NY Post] |
|
In addition to releasing a gay pride message yesterday, the Senator’s campaign last night organized an impromptu conference call for about 1200 Democratic supporters. While ostensibly meant to inform the Democratic candidate’s constituents, the call served another, far more important purpose: rallying Senator Hillary Clinton’s supporters. In fact, the former contender’s name arose within seconds of the call’s commencement, when Obama's deputy campaign manager Steve Hildebrand began, “It is a very important time for our country, our party, for Senator Obama and Senator Clinton.” |