In less than a week online, a Reddit thread about Grindr manners racked up more than 500 comments as r/askgaybros users debated whether interested parties are entitled to a response on dating apps.
One Reddit user opened the discussion with this bold statement: “Nobody owes you a damn thing on hookup apps … and no response is indeed a response.”
He continued:
How about we take this to the next level?
Subscribe to our newsletter for a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
If somebody doesn’t text you back, it could be for a [number] of reasons. Maybe they’re busy and didn’t see your text, maybe they’re not looking to hook up right then and there, or maybe they’re just not interested. So what? The point is that no one owes you a list of reasons why they’re not interested. No response is a response, so y’all just need to get off your high horse and put more time into maturing because if someone resorts to insults and swearing when they don’t receive a response from you, imagine what they’re like if you were to actually meet them in person.
Many users agreed with this Grindr philosophy—or, at least, they don’t take it to heart when they don’t get a response. But not everyone believes silence is the best policy. Here’s a recap of arguments posted on the thread so far:
Some people have sworn off responding when they’re not interested.
“I used to think a nonresponse was rude, but after being berated by people for saying that you aren’t interested, I get the why,” one user wrote. “Gays aren’t ready for rejection.”
Another guy agreed, commenting, “Yeah, the people saying ignoring or blocking is rude probably haven’t been on the rejecting side a lot. Most guys get vile when you reject them.”
A third user wrote, “I tried for a bit being the ‘good’ person and telling them I’m not interested/they’re not my type or whatever. Got some incredibly salty people spewing vitriol at me and decided it just wasn’t worth it. Went back to just not responding.”
Others don’t mind being ignored.
Being left on read doesn’t bother some of these Reddit commenters. “I don’t mind guys who don’t respond, and I certainly don’t message again trying to initiate a response,” said one. “You just move on. No problem.”
Another person said he “appreciate[s] the ones who don’t respond versus the ones who are all for it and then bail or block when it’s time to meet up.”
Related:
Gay Redditors list what they look for in a Grindr match, besides looks
Matchmaker matchmaker make me a match.
And others think there are ways of responding politely.
Someone else on the thread begged to differ, writing, “I don’t agree, but that’s just me. I find it mean. Just be honest with people! I hate it when that happens to me, so I try not to do it to others. At least you know it’s not a bot but a real person if they respond with something like, ‘I’m sorry, man, I’m not interested. Happy hunting!’ [That’s] my usual reply. Sometimes I’m not into them sexually but I’m down to chat. But I let them know that. I try to be polite about it.”
One Reddit user said he has never gotten a “violent” answer after saying he’s not interested. “Maybe the way y’all say it is rude,” he conjectured. “‘Pass’ is not a polite way of indicating you’re not interested. Y’all should’ve also learnt manners.”
And someone else commented, “Simply saying you’re not interested has a level of integrity. … It’s not about being a good person per se. It’s about being clear in a way that silence just isn’t—which is why someone might hit you up multiple times until you do respond.”
Do you respond to Grindr users when you’re just not that into them? And if so, how? Give us your take in the comments.
KissBananaPeels
Nope you are NOT…
The problem becomes that people want to elevate an app to a level that MANY if NOT MOST gay men do not engage with in the real world…DO IT IN THE REAL WORLD FIRST with fidelity
bachy
I’m not on Grindr, but I vote for “no response” on the apps, particularly if they’re making sexual overtures. Why open up lines of communication if you don’t feel the same way? It’s like a stranger winking at you at a crowded party. If you’re not charmed, it’s best to not respond.
But if someone on the app is just being friendly and you find their profile interesting, a friendly response could generate a new friend.
Man About Town
“Y’all should’ve also learnt manners.”
How about “Y’all should’ve also learned there’s no such word as learnt!”
still_onthemark
Ooh you burnt him good… I mean burned
tonylovesotis
Actually, “learnt” is the correct past tense form of learn. The word “learned” is solely American and Canadian in its usage. All other English speaking nations (UK, Australia, NZ, South Africa etc.) use the original “King’s English” version: learnt.
storm45701
I was going to say: Learnt is in the OED
LumpyPillows
Learnt is correct, but not used by Americans.
winemaker
Why is this a question when it’s just good manners? Really, if you’re not interested for any reason, get back to the responder, don’t ghost them and leave them hanging, this is rude and immature, You don’t owe them an explanation or have to give a reason, other than thanks, but no thanks, but to string someone along just for the fun of it and ignore them, again rude and juvenile. Look at this this way, how would like this to happen to you? What goes around eventually comes around. This is the same as playing games with others emotions, On the other hand, many gay men seem to have the rude thing down pack and show their disinterest by being snarky, rude and immature. And I thought we were supposed to be adults, ghosting and being rude for no reason are things teenagers do.
draperdude1
I agree that no response is a response. Maybe you are not interested, you may be busy or not looking at the time but if you engage in conversation and then stop replying, that can be rude. Timing is everything & sometimes you may just leave app open or fall asleep,
Consider This
Some clearly believe any negative response to their message opens a window for accusations and argument.
It does not. No thanks means no thanks. A further explanation is not required.
After enough baseless accusations are tossed about, delete or block becomes the most straightforward and sensible approach.
Matthewmatthew
Everyone responds to my blatant sexual advances on Grindr. Who wouldn’t. I’m 5’10, 389lbs. Balding, impotent and flatulent. I’m in the middle of my 3rd bankruptcy and can write bad checks with the best of them. Jealous Ladies?
still_onthemark
Does your wife Melania know you’re “dating”? lol
Stache1
Oooh you sound veddy veddy nice. My bussy so hot for you. I available to you soon. I hot model here. How much you say you have?
By now. I be in touch soon. Be best.
monty clift
“Gays aren’t ready for rejection.”
I don’t think it’s gay men who are the problem here. Certain people who have no business being on Grindr seem to be the ones incessantly complaining about getting rejected left and right. Read the room.
jhmotjr
If you’re not interested in someone who’s liked you or otherwise sent you a message or even pics, you definitely should not respond, because doing so will only give them the false impression that you’re interested in them, or at least open to continuing the dialogue, and give them false encouragement, wasting their time and yours. Further, those without profile pics who make attempts to contact me are an instant no-go in my book.
myloginname
Never been on Grindr but on another app where I only see messages if I am logged on I got a string of angry messages from a potential hook up that I had messaged in the past but never met. He was texting like a woman scorned for months…well I hadn’t logged on in all of that time so I never saw his messages. Wrote him back, told him so, and politely told him I was blocking him.