
Actor John Barrowman testified at the Kevin Spacey court case in New York yesterday.
Fellow actor Anthony Rapp is suing Spacey and seeking $40million in damages. It dates back to an alleged incident at a party Spacey hosted at his New York apartment in 1986. Rapp, then 14, says Spacey, 26, tried to initiate a sexual encounter with him.
Related: Kevin Spacey’s defense team aggressively quiz Anthony Rapp in sexual misconduct trial
Yesterday, lawyers quizzed Barrowman about his own encounters with Spacey, specifically one when he was 19. Barrowman was called as a witness for the defense, reports Deadline.
Barrowman gave a sworn testimony in May 2021. It was played to the court before he took the stand.
He recalled the night he met Spacey. He says Spacey invited him, then aged 19, and Rapp, then 14, to his apartment. Rapp went to the bathroom. When he was out of the room, Barrowman says, “Playfully, Mr. Spacey pushed me back” on the bed. He draped his arm around Barrowman and lay talking to him. Barrowman said the situation was “probably not the best one to be in if Anthony came out of the bathroom.”
Barrowman subsequently pushed Spacey’s arm away and when Rapp returned from the bathroom, said, “We should probably get going.”
“I didn’t want him to be in a situation like that,” Barrowman said on the stand.
Barrowman was asked if he felt threatened by Spacey.
“I was a big boy … I was also, actually, to be honest, quite flattered that an older man was showing any interest in me.
“I felt no threat whatsoever.”
Rapp tells Barrowman of his experience with Kevin Spacey
Barrowman says it was only years later that Rapp told him, over dinner in London, about a second encounter the younger man had at Spacey’s apartment when he says the older actor picked him up, put him on the bed, and laid on top of him.
Spacey’s lawyer asked Barrowman if Rapp spoke with disdain about Spacey on this occasion.
“No, not that I recall. No disdain, no anger. It was a very matter-of-fact conversation about what happened,” replied Barrowman.
Related: John Barrowman addresses his on-set flashing scandal head-on
Rapp is suing Spacey for assault, battery and intentionally inflicting emotional distress. Rapp took the stand last week and was aggressively questioned by Spacey’s lawyers, who attempted to throw doubt on his credibility.
Yesterday, Spacey’s lawyers successfully argued for some of the claims to be tossed. Judge Lewis A. Kaplan agreed to drop the charge of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Kevin Spacey calls Rapp’s accusations “not true”
Spacey yesterday took the stand for the first time himself. He said Rapp’s accusations against him are “not true”.
He began by talking about his upbringing, calling his father a neo-Nazi and homophobe who terrorized him.
“My father was a white supremacist and neo-Nazi,” Spacey said. “I have never talked about these things publicly. Ever.”
He went on to say, “My father used to yell at me about the idea I might be gay.
“He would scream at me: ‘don’t be a’… he would use an f word that was very derogatory to the gay community.”
Spacey recalled the story to explain some of his reluctance to talk about his sexuality before he decided to come out as gay when Rapp’s accusations surfaced.
Spacey went on to pick holes in Rapp’s recollection of events. He says the apartment he had in 1986 was basically a one-room studio, with a bed in the center. He suggested Rapp’s recall, specifically him carrying the boy to a bedroom, was wrong.
When a Buzzfeed article appeared in 2017 detailing Rapp’s accusations, Spacey says he was advised by publicists to issue an apology, despite having no recollection of the alleged event. He said he regretted doing so.
“I was being encouraged to apologize and I’ve learned a lesson, which is never apologize for something you didn’t do,” he told the court.
Besides this court case, other men have come forward to make allegations against Spacey and he faces a separate criminal trial in the UK.
In August, Spacey was also ordered by a judge in Los Angeles to pay the producers of the Netflix show, House of Cards, $31million to cover losses they incurred after firing him in 2017 after allegations emerged of him sexually harassing crew members.
DPOnyc
John Barrowman as a witness? His perspective on sexual appropriateness is skewed at best.
Man About Town
Yes, and that makes this yet another farcical element in an already farcical situation.
Rapp has spent decades enjoying a prolific career and a happy marriage, but he’s now suing for “emotional distress”? Spacey should countersue him for libel.
Rugby8
Oh?
Do you KNOW John? Hung out with him a lot, huh?
Otherwise- shut up
jay 700
i agree. please another gay person coming forward. 19 years old when this supposedly happened. come on take his hands out of your pants if you don’t like it. you gold digger.
Ultimo Patriarch
If you had been alive in that era you would have known Spacey had a deserved reputation.
Caelestius
No-one except Rapp and Spacey really know what happened, so why is everyone so sure of everything?
I oppose Rapp’s case because nothing he described rises to inescapable aggression; more like escapable discomfort. Certainly nothing that warrants millions of bucks in compensation, or destroying a working actor’s career.
The biggest offense here is the trial by headline in a country that presumes innocence before guilt, and promises a fair trial of one’s peers. As with Al Franken and Garrison Keillor, Kevin Spacey is getting neither. And our community is smeared with innuendi because a young guy couldn’t tell an older guy to “Shove off, Sailor?” Rapp, more than Spacey, has made himself the usual suspect.
LumpyPillows
I am concerned about some of the accusations from Spacey’s tenure in London, but this Rapp accusation is ridiculous.
Clearly Rapp was hanging out with Spacey on multiple times, so that was news to me. It shows Rapp liked being around Spacey. I’m at a loss as to what adult supervision Rapp had – that’s who really should be under the microscope. Also, Rapp’s own words tell me nothing actually happened. So, yeah, what exactly is his damages? A man showed interest in him and when rebuffed he left him alone? That’s life. 14? Yeah. I was sucking dick at 14. Get over it.
DBMC
You’re not Rapp. You were not there. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
LumpyPillows
No, I wasn’t there. You weren’t either. I do read what is written.
What exactly do you disagree with. You folks that just like to be nasty nellies are lazy. Rapp got upset 30+ years ago. Worthy of $40,000,000? I say no. What exactly is your problem with that? I mean besides always needing to be a dick…
DBMC
Rapp was there. You weren’t. You have no idea what went on in anyone’s mind.
Rugby8
It’s total BS
Rapp trying to make himself “relevant”
He has a freaking nerve trying to ruin someone else’s life.
ANY proof? Seriously.
Well of course not.
This is part of the whole metoo crap. “I say it happened, therefore you Have to believe me”.
Nope. That’s NOT how the Law works.
Innocent, unless there is proof of otherwise
Harley
I was molested at the age of 13 by a youth counselor who was in his 40s. Yes I enjoyed the attention as a young gay teen. I was horny as hell. But I wasn’t the adult. The counselor should have known better.
jay 700
me too and loving it.
Cam
I see the right wing troll account is STILL trying to rehab this name.
It will come in with a “while I may not like…..” comment before it defends a bigot, Republican, or in this case somebody who has been proven to be a sexual harasser and has already lost similar cases.
As always, your trolling is sad and weak.
barryaksarben
reminds me a bit ike the Polanski “victim” who has said she thinks he should be able to come back to American , WHERE was her mother? Her mother was at fault and if he should be punished (which if you know the whole story he was) then she should also have been jailed
Fahd
If IIED has been dropped as a claim, I can’t see the award being that large even if Rapp prevails. The only winner in this case is going to be Spacey’s lawyers. Rapp’s lawyers probably won’t get paid. (Maybe they should have accepted a reasonable settlement for their client?)
It probably shouldn’t matter, but if this case ends up the dud it seems like so far, some of the other cases might lose some of their momentum.
Whatever Spacey’s retroactive justification for his bad behavior, he should be held to account (see upcoming criminal cases), and I hope he is getting help.
southernway
There’s the rub, “in his mind.” Rupp might believe what he says is true but it’s working out that he’s delusional messy with the facts of the event or evening details. Spacey panicked when the accusations came out -as most people would regarding a long forgotten night.
Rupp is at a disadvantage here with legal advice and really should have been advised to go home -see a shrink and move on with his life. He’s doesn’t enough damage to another man to last three lifetimes.
bluemarks222
I agree. I think the “kid” is looking for $$$$.
inbama
@bluemarks222
LOL.
50 year old “kid.”
[email protected]
1986……are we really taking any of this serious. For those of you bad at math….that’s 36 years ago. This case never should have been allowed to see a court room.
Brian
For many sorts of crimes, the statute of limitations is longer when the victim is a minor. That’s just how the laws are written, and the principle of it has stood up in courts all over the country again and again.
Toofie
I just don’t see how they can prove anything?
Cam
The right wing troll has brought in at least THREE screenames as it always does to defend Spacey.
bachy
Spacey is INNOCENT!!!
Ultimo Patriarch
Bullshit. He had reputation……
bachy
Lies! All LIES I tell you!!!
jackscott
John Barrowman is such a sexy guy. Granted, he isn’t the best to speak on appropriate behavior. However, we need to remember John was 19 & Kevin was early 20’s so no issue. The issue with Anthony just seems that he is trying to jump on the bandwagon of victims. I don’t believe his story for a moment. After all these years he wants his day in court… something is off.
Cam
I can’t believe he was a witness for the defense. His interview was terrible for Spacey.
1. It showed Spacey had a pattern of behavior, and the way he acted with Barrowman was similar to how Rapp described it.
2. It also gave another example of Rapp telling somebody about Spacey’s behavior year before the case was filed. That is in addition to him giving the interview to the Advocate 22 years ago when they deleted Spacey’s name from the copy.
Spacey’s lawyers made a terrible choice in calling him as a witness.
Kangol2
Cam is right here. Barrowman didn’t exonerate Spacey, he essentially helped indict him. I’m kind of amazed that most of the commenters above are missing this.
When I initially read about that play that Rapp, then 14, was in, I thought, even despite Spacey’s reputation, maybe Rapp did conflate the real and the fictional, but Barrowman basically says, Spacey did something very similar to me (though Barrowman was 5 years older and of age) AND that Rapp told him this years ago, not just yesterday.
And yes, there was also Rapp’s Advocate interview, which buttresses the fact that this isn’t just a new-found memory or account.
southernway
The verdict is in! Go home Rapp and obtain some sound mental therapy to help you over your delusional memory psychological syndrome and hope he doesn’t sue you.