Welcome to Curtain Call, our mostly queer take on the latest openings on Broadway and beyond.
The Rundown:
It’s spring 1776, and the Second Continental Congress is gathered in Philadelphia while the American colonies fight through the Revolutionary War’s bloody first year. It may seem an unlikely story for a Broadway musical, yet the subject matter feels more timely than ever in politically contentious 2022 America.
The Roundabout Theatre Company revival of 1776 dares to recast the original 1969 production with women, transgender and nonbinary performers who represent a range of ages, races, and ethnicities. They are the individuals who were not included or considered in our nation’s founding, each of them powerful enough to shake the stage of the American Airlines Theatre. From co-directors Jeffrey L. Page and Diane Paulus, 1776 is a lens on America’s origins, and it is determined to broaden the audience’s focus.
No Tea, No Shade:
The concept of Paulus and Page’s 1776 is thrilling: to behold a diverse company portraying a story that’s literally about the ideals and principles of white-cis-male politicians. From the opening curtain, anticipation runs high for a mind-blowing or at least inspiring show — probably, in part, due to the success of Hamilton and the sparse, dramatic, and surprisingly bloody 2019 revival of Oklahoma!.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
But in reality, the onstage talent runs much hotter than the book, music and lyrics, and choreography can sustain. Led by Crystal Lucas-Perry in the lead role of earnest John Adams, along with Patrena Murray as feisty Benjamin Franklin, and two dozen other players representing the signers of the Declaration of Independence, 1776 rarely moves beyond the practical matters printed in our dusty history books to reach — or reveal — new territory.
Related: In ‘american (tele)visions, the American Dream becomes a nightmare
This production’s most revelatory moments come buried in a few key songs. In Act I, the duet “Yours, Yours, Yours” between John Adams and his wife Abigail (a scene-stealing Allyson Kaye Daniel) suggests her influence on John’s political strategies. Similarly, in Act II, South Carolina’s Edward Rutledge (a commanding Sara Porkalob) sings “Molasses to Rum” to expose the Northern colonies’ shady dependence on slavery through the triangular trade with Europe, Africa, and Southern sugar plantations.
It’s hard not to think how formidable the original production (which won three Tony Awards, including Best Musical) must have felt and how audiences may have embraced 1776 as a reminder of the precarious nature of democracy. They could see how, from the very beginning, Congressional votes were often evenly split.
It would seem like this production, with a cast revolutionary in its own way, should pack a punch. Instead, it feels more like a limp salute.
In 2022, we’re at a very similarly divided, violent moment in U.S. history. So it would seem like this production, with a cast revolutionary in its own way, should pack a punch. Instead, it feels more like a limp salute. Even John Clancy’s new orchestrations can’t lift much of the score’s lifeless patter while Page’s presentational, posturing choreography lands like a sledgehammer. Scott Pask’s drab scenic design is what we might imagine the first congressional chamber to look like minus the sunlight, and except for a startling final tableau, fails to frame or enhance its occupants.
Despite the effort to reposition its relevancy, this 1776 feels dated. The tremendous social and cultural shifts for people of color, women, LGBTQ folx, immigrants, and other Americans uncovered during the past half-century are difficult to imprint, despite the creators’ estates granting permissions to recontextualize the script.
One buried moment is the silent portrayal of Robert Hemings as Jefferson’s bodyservant. The boy was sister to Sally Hemings, documented to be Jefferson’s slave, “concubine,” and mother to at least six of his children. Even a book-smart AP history student would have difficulty plucking out the reference. During this reviewer’s attendance, one nearby audience member audibly muttered, “What about Sally Hemings?”
Let’s Have a Moment:
One of 1776’s most poignant moments occurs prior to the performance when the familiar house voiceover reminds audiences to silence their phones. But this time, Indigenous American cast member Brooke Simpson (who plays Roger Sherman of Connecticut) adds an additional note, acknowledging the First Nation tribes who dwelled on American soil long before colonists arrived. Simpson adds that the theatre stands on land that was originally inhabited by the Lenape people, on the island they called Manahatta.
Once the curtain rises, the company transitions from contemporary clothes into designer Emilio Sosa’s period costumes — with Simpson adding a beautiful Native American beaded necklace over her colonial coat. The moment earns rousing applause yet never quite resolves. Paulus told the New York Times the show “is to hold history as a predicament, rather than an affirming myth,” which holds true when considering this fight for independence fails to acknowledge the stolen land on which the country was built.
The Last Word:
It’s easy to want to like 1776, not only because of its embrace of diverse identities but because many Americans, this writer included, straddle a sense of patriotism and national ownership with very real worries about the erosion of civil rights and equality. America’s history is messy at best. If that’s what the creators were going for, this is a revolution worth seeing.
1776 plays on Broadway at the American Airlines Theatre through January 8, 2023.
wikidBSTN
—““Molasses to Rum” to expose the Northern colonies’ shady dependence on slavery through the triangular trade with Europe, Africa, and Southern sugar plantations.”—– Basically a discredited myth. A myth started by Southern academics trying to pin some of the blame for post-colonial slavery on the North.
Yes, sugar (along with other goods) from the West Indies was sent to New England. Sugar in the form of molasses was then distilled into rum.
And true, rum and other goods from New England were exported to Africa. But that’s it. These were disjointed transactions conducted by different merchants. They were not the same enterprise on different legs of a 3 stop voyage.
Furthermore, historians have shown that no New England merchants engaged in the slave trade end of the so-called triangle (slaves coming out fo Africa being shipped to the West Indies).
There were however, Southern slave ships run by Southern merchants who did engage in this triangular trade – and they were the same merchants on all three legs of the trade route. Not so New England.
JAWIWA
Actually, what you are practicing is the century old practice of absolving the North of responsibility for the slave trade. In 1776, the triangle trade song serves as a reminder that the ENTIRE American economy and existence was dependent upon the slave trade and slave labor: from cotton and tobacco exports to the banking and insurance industries to the building of Washington DC.
Jim
So why are these people playing white male parts when they are not white males?
I know I know. just making a point
Flamingo Falls
Apparently, you are not familiar with “Hamilton.”
Ronbo
Our community apparently is subject to re-writing history to match our current opinions… just like Republicans. The difference is that Republicans use their lies for effective political strategy. This gives Republican strategy a boost while making us look deceptive.
We can be better – even in our fantasies. Talent and effort to create this could have been used to promote the Equal Rights Amendment. Instead, we get false images and Miss Information receiving a participation trophy for false reality. This isn’t helping anyone.
Let’s bring about REAL change instead of buying into presentism, pretense and false images. Dazzle us with what can be, instead of what never was.
Ronbo
“But Ronbo”, they will scream – “this will encourage women to get politicaly involved.” It also will teach people that the truth is no longer the basis for OUR reality. This gives licensee to our opponents to claim that our very real, very valid thoughts and feelings are also just made up and as fake as the show’s premise.
Having not seen the show, I’m sure that there are good things and valuable lessons. I just hope that the benefits outweigh the damage it does when FOX and the Right eviscerate the Left for encouraging historical re-interpritation or as they will call it, “lying and deceiving CRT gone haywire”.
Let’s be progressive without putting road-blocks in our own way. Push for acceptance, compassion and common sense.
Neoprene
Let’s get REALLY progressive. It’s time for the all honkey version of Roots.
Ronbo
The natural girl who tied to win with Lia, the trans girl, is on commercials throughout the nation appealing to the 70% of voters who believe that physical bodies are almost always either a boy or a girl. Gender is a secondary MENTAL sexual development – just as significant; but, more complex and misunderstood.
Lia is being used to defeat the advances that our community brought to the Democratic party. We must remain true to science. Where are our peeps when it comes to mental health and science?
Going silent or getting angry isn’t going help Democrats. Unless we provide the mental health science to sway the 70%, the trans community will serve as the Achilles heel of the Democrats. Then THEY, the Democratic politicians, will turn on us – like they turned against progressives like Sen. Sanders.
Those anti-trans, anti-Democratic party ads are changing minds. It’s time our story is advertised. Problem is that most establishment Democratic politicians prize winning more than our community.
Speak now or watch what we built out of love crumble into fascism.
abfab
Is it any wonder Ronbo is not a Broadway director? He’s too busy protecting Fox News and republicans from having their own feelings on the arts and ”the community”.
Avant-gard….look it up. Educate yourself and write your own screenplay or book to fit your own limited narrative.