Confession: I’ve seen the incredibly cringe Showtime series “Queer as Folk” more times than I can count. The show—adapted from the UK original created by Russell T Davies in 1999—concerned a group of (all white, all cis) gays living in Pittsburgh and navigating their 30s. It was not very good, but it was all we had, and somehow, I not only watched it until the bitter end, I keep on watching it.
Embarrassing as that is to admit, it means I come to the table with a complete and detailed knowledge of every absurd plot twist, character arc, and bad joke that ever made its way through that fabled writer’s room—including one very steamy arc including a closeted football player and the show’s most femme character, Emmett Honeycutt.
Things kick off in Season 4: Emmett (Peter Paige) is at this point running his own catering business, and one of his clients, a straight woman named Sierra, is engaged to the impossibly butch football star Drew Boyd. Boyd, played by real-life footballer Matt Battaglia, is chiseled, monosyllabic, and basically the archetype of the jock bully come to life. When Emmett caters Sierra and Drew’s engagement party, Drew makes a homophobic comment about Emmett’s obvious queerness. And Emmett, of course, won’t take this lying down.
Not one to be bullied, shamed, or silenced, Emmett lets Drew have it in front of his football friends.
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
Emmett puts Drew right in his place, and then promptly leaves the function. When he comes back a few days later to pick up his check, however, he gets a moment alone with Drew. And things get very hot, very quickly.
The two end up hooking up, and it’s not just a one-time thing, either. For weeks, Drew and Emmett meet at the same hotel room far from the prying eyes of Drew’s fiancee. Talk about a sneaky link!
There’s just one problem: Drew is deep in the closet. Any time Emmett tries to get him to acknowledge his attraction to men, he denies it.
“I’m not a f*g,” Drew tells Emmett. “F*gs are sissies, girls, pansies. You think I’m that?”
Emmett explains that you don’t have to be femme to be gay, because this show takes place in 2005 and apparently such things need to be explained. But Drew isn’t having it.
“Name one f** every kid wants to grow up to be,” he says. To which Emmett responds: “Harvey Fierstein?”
As you can imagine, it’s a pretty uncomfortable fling for Emmett, even if he is having tremendously hot sex with a star quarterback. And because the word “bisexual” basically doesn’t exist in the “Queer as Folk” universe, Drew is simply seen as a self-loathing gay man trapped in the closet.
Eventually, Drew does come out, helped along by Emmett, who acts as his friend, lover, and support system after his outing by the press causes him to lose almost everything: his position on the team, his shot at the Super Bowl, and his engagement to Sierra.
It’s Drew’s love for Emmett that keeps his strong throughout, and after the tabloids start spreading the “rumor” that Drew is gay, he goes on a talk show to take the narrative into his own hands. The talk show he appears on happens to be on the same network where Emmett does a “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” spinoff segment.
With Emmett looking on, Drew comes out and claims him with an on-air kiss. And everyone is astonished. “I’ve always thought of you as a man’s man,” Drew’s interviewer says, as if you can’t be gay and a man’s man at the same time. Because once again: 2005.
It’s important to point out that all this happens in Season 5, the same season that introduces the controversial “Proposition 14”, the show’s fictionalized answer to Prop 8, which threatens to take away gay marriage, adoption, insurance access, and partnership rights. When Drew comes out, he’s showing the world that there isn’t one way to be gay. And in 2005, strange as it may seem, that was something people needed to hear.
Because that’s the other cringe aspect of “Queer as Folk.” It’s a show that fully ignores trans narratives, as well as the stories of queer and trans people of color, in order to make a bid for respectability. Drew Boyd’s storyline mattered because it showed the straight world that anyone—your favorite action hero, your star linebacker, your “straight-passing” friend—could be queer. For the time, it was big news. And as someone who remembers how threatened straight people were before Prop 8, it brings a lot of those memories back.
Almost 15 years before Carl Nassib became the first active NFL player to come out, Drew Boyd gave us the screen kiss of our dreams. It didn’t matter that it came at the expense of so much else: at the time, it was powerful and real.
Today, it’s hard to justify a lot of the choices “Queer as Folk” made: so much so that we got a brand new reimagining of the show last summer. But before we had stars like Lil Nas X and JoJo Siwa or shows like “Heartstopper” and “Euphoria,” we had the impossibly ripped Drew Boyd telling Emmett—and the world—that more important than being a “man’s man” is being your own man: unapologetic, out, and proud.
JPB
Yeah, but it was a bummer that Drew and Emmet weren’t together in the last episode.
SUPREME
Emmet was my favorite character.
Shady Gaga
Queerty just can’t refrain from bashing Queer as Folk, which was groundbreaking when it appeared. Yes, we all know there were no bisexuals, or trans people or intersex people, or non-binary people, or asexual people, or two-spirit people, or BIPOCs, (did I leave anyone out?). But it aired in 2000, not 2023, so judging it from your presentism point of reference has no merit. It was a great show because depicted our lives as real and whole and full, and a show that most gays, me included, looked forward to watching on Sunday night. And your point of the Show as “making a bid for respectability,” is completely off point. Queer as Folk was made by gays and for gays and was full of sex scenes, backrooms, and bathhouses and made no attempt to be “respectable” to heteros.
boblrice
Looks like our comments came in at the time. 😉
Joshooeerr
Maybe the snarky writer can tell us how he felt about the exhaustively inclusive, but utterly unwatchable re-boot?
lykeitiz
OMG….Say it again for those in the back! QAF was groundbreaking. There still has not been anything on U.S. television to compare. It was unapologetic, and as you stated, made NO attempt to cater to heteros. It was life changing.
boblrice
Henry, is it perhaps a little unfair to hold a contemporary lens over something 20 years old in order to critique all the things it wasn’t? The show was never all that good. But to complain that it doesn’t live up to our current standards of inclusiveness is just so tiresome.
Should we dismiss “Parting Glances”, an amazing and ground-breaking film, because it was about a cis white couple? How about a dismissal of “Brokeback Cabin” because the actors were both straight? I could go on and on.
It seems you feel guilty about enjoying the series and have to apologize for it and make sure your audience is well aware that you recognize there are no trans characters. That just wasn’t part of story.
This show served a purpose, was definitely of its time, and also gave queer actors an opportunity at a time when being out in Hollywood significantly decreased one’s options.
TBH, I never cared for the show, but not for the reasons you outlined. I just felt a lot of the writing was hackneyed. But I do know that having that show on television made a difference for gay men at the time. No it didn’t include everyone. But getting some representation at this time was still very meaningful.
RandomNRG
I wrote this comment 5 hours ago, but it had 2 swear words in it so it obviously needs to be moderated.
Here it is again, without the profanity:
Despite the author’s needless attempt to tarnish a series that was a product of its time with his SJW woke nonsense, let’s remember that this was the first time a truly gay series was broadcast in NorthAM, and dealt with many of the important issues that were taking place at that time.
Many of what were considered critical problems then are now viewed as part of the norm now, and I can virtually guarantee that people in 10 years will criticize the one season wonder QAF reboot for it being tone deaf as well on whatever offends that next viewing generation. It is what it is.
Kangol2
“SJW woke nonsense” blah blah. Don’t you all ever give this right-wing racist crap a break?
johncp56
I love Emmet and drew OMG the actor is a babe for real
Sharpei
Oh lord, this article is seriously preachy, performative and unnecessarily divisive. But it’s what I’ve come to expect from Queerty these days tbh
IvanPH
The original show stuck to a formula that sells and that’s why it lasted for five seasons.
The reboot went woke, displeased the majority of its target audience (cis gay men), and was canceled after one season.
PQ
After reading this piece and revisiting the one you previously wrote on the reboot, I have to ask, in all seriousness, are you ok? Your self loathing is palpable in these pieces. I don’t say that to be snarky, but out of genuine concern. Your writing is less about objective critique of media than it is about hashing out your own relationship to the queer community and your own masculinity. Sure, these ideas should be explored in your work – it is YOUR work after all, but it seems like sometimes you let your demons get the better of you. I would also encourage you to consider the view points of other queers when writing. You seem to advocate for the broader sense of community in more of a performative sense than in an actually meaningful one.
1967Man
A television show needn’t be everything to everybody. The first American QAF wasn’t a great show, but — with Will & Grace — it was an important show, because visibility is important, and it was really important then. Like Friends, QAF was a show about friends, and — to the author’s dismay — friend groups are often/usually pretty monochromatic. I’ve been around a long time, and my friend group does not check the boxes.