Red, White & Royal Blue‘s steamy sex scene solidifies the bond between Prince Henry and the “First Son” of the United States.
It also shows heterosexuals that gay men can have sex just like them!
When Alex Claremont-Diaz (Taylor Zakhar Perez) and Prince Henry (Nicholas Galitzine) get ready for the climax of their New Year’s Eve rendezvous, Claremont-Diaz shoves his Royal Highness onto the bed and drapes over his perfectly toned body. The camera never moves, showing the two hunky protagonists lock eyes at the moment of insertion.
It’s a brilliant directorial tactic that highlights the emotional power of sexual intercourse. There are many positions that work for anal sex, but missionary might be the most intimate.
That’s right, hets: missionary. It is possible!
One blissfully unaware woman on the platform previously known as Twitter started the delightful weekend discourse.
Thank you red white and royal blue ❤️
— Mario🫧🧜🏽♀️ (@mmdisney200) August 12, 2023
it’s my honor
— Red, White & Royal Blue on Prime (@RWRBonPrime) August 12, 2023
Those who read Red White & Royal Blue, the best-selling novel by Casey McQuiston, know that sex is an integral part of Alex and Prince Henry’s journey. Though the much-discussed sex scene earned the movie an “R” rating, director Matthew López told Queerty its insertion (pun-intended) was non-negotiable.
“There was no conversation whatsoever after the R-rating came to us about changing it,” he said. “I couldn’t tell this story without telling that part of the story.”
In addition to being important, the scene is hot. Perhaps the most scintillating part of the whole experience comes when Alex’s key necklace is dangling over Henry, signifying how close the two men are getting with one another.
Since the camera never pans away from Alex and Henry’s faces, viewers don’t see how their bodies are contorting. López says that was intentional.
“I think that this particular movie and this particular pairing and this particular scene is interesting to me because it wasn’t anything I can remember seeing before,” he said. “Which is [to say,] I definitely wanted to make sure that we never lost sight of Alex and Henry in that scene, and that it didn’t become about bodies, it didn’t become about choreography.”
But while we’re on the topic, what about their bodies?
The gays, of course, don’t need a rundown of how it all works. But thankfully, at least one person was kind enough to explain to “Grace,” our inquiring female ally, how everything goes down.
Lives were changed pic.twitter.com/peV5m5dMC0
— Jontoshua Williams (@J0nt0shua) August 12, 2023
“Grace” is correct on one point: missionary sex requires some additional steps for gays. The legs must be up, and sometimes a pillow is added for extra support.
For the bottom, missionary can double as a nice core workout. Now you know why those gays in Provincetown or Fire Island have those six-pack abs!
“Grace,” to her credit, took our word for it.
Omg icon
— Jontoshua Williams (@J0nt0shua) August 12, 2023
With two hot cisgender leads, Red, White & Royal Blue doesn’t break any cinematic boundaries. But at least, it shows the world that gay sex can be sensual, too. We’re not only about slamming each other from behind!
We are all verse kings in that way.
peluzo
This isn’t a thing. This Grace lady is an idiot…
Jon in Canada
Unfortunately, it is indeed a thing. My husband and I still, though not very often, get asked if gay men can face each other during sex. Granted, it’s rarer today, but even a decade ago people would be puzzled.
As for Grace, I don’t think she’s an idiot so much as just blissfully ignorant about gay sex.
Diplomat
“Red, White & Royal Blue‘s steamy sex scene solidifies the bond between Prince Harry and the “First Son” of the United States.”
Nice to know that Prince Harry and first son Hunter Biden are doing well. Prince Harry gave us his all! Didn’t know he was a bottom.
I’m so impressed with the writers article here. So accurate. So informative. But what about Prince Henry?
Any more screw ups you’d like to share?
abfab
Having one screw up around is enough. Huner Biden sends his love
wolfman6
Just that you need glasses, sweetheart. Read that sentence again. It says Henry, not Harry. So your whole post is as blind as you.
abfab
Cupcake needs more than glasses….
Just.my.opinion
There is a lot of ignorance in this world and, apparently, people do not mind showing it online.
abfab
The conservative Queers were pretty shocked, too. Shocked!
Fahd
Next, we´ll be telling Grace that the earth is spherical and not flat as she has been thinking. Omg. There´s so much actual gay sex on the internet and in mainstream movies that it´s willful ignorance or more likely disingenuous attention-seeking.
I recommend Matt Brennen´s Commentary, “The gay rom-com we’ve been waiting for” in today’s LA Times. And not just because he agrees with me.
Randyindfw
Pretty sure his (The Prince) name is Henry…. Just sayin’
still_onthemark
Prince Harry’s real name is also Henry (as in Henry Charles Albert David).
Harry has always been a nickname for Henry.
abfab
Diplomat is not the sharpest tack in the drawer. He knows not what he speaks and thinks he’s part of the Royal Family. And he’s a Palm Springs expert. He smells like Georgei Santos.
Diplomat
The raging mutant attacks again.
Diplomat
The Prince’s name in the movie is Henry, and is at no time interchanged with Harry.
abfab
it’s nice that you have something so superficial to cling to, Diplomat. Bravo!
smittoons
I have definitely run into perfectly well-meaning straight men and women who were truly clueless about how missionary works for gay men. I can only imagine what their sex lives are like if the idea of a little movement like that doesn’t occur to them to try.
Rank Amateur
I’m just glad straight people are watching it. It’s a good movie.
Joshooeerr
Oh, come on, Queerty! “A brilliant directorial tactic”??!! It is literally the way almost every sex scene in Hollywood history was shot from the beginning of film through to the more explicit 60s and 70s, and still the way any more demure sex scenes are shot. There was nothing remotely “brilliant” or inspired about it.
Diplomat
Calling the lead males “cisgender” in the article is not true and is a slur. Str8 people hate that term. Neither actor has disclosed their sexual preferences or anything about their relationships. Best not to assume anything at this point.
Man About Town
What does cisgender have to do with sexual preferences? I thought it just meant a person who isn’t trans!
Matt in SD
That’s not what cisgender means. It’s not about sexual identity, it’s about gender identity. It means not trans. It’s the same as heterosexual, but for gender. It is in no way an insult; it is merely descriptive. Hope that clears it up.
Jack Meoff
Watched this last night and thought it came across like a Lifetime production. The book was a better read than this movie was to watch. I don’t blame the actors I blame production and probably budget cuts.
theaterbloke
I believe the missionary sex scene between Jonathan Groff and Russell Tovey in Looking garnered the same “gays can do that?” reaction
Moritz
I thought that they made love in Paris, not after the NYE party in the US? They just had their first kiss, outside in the snow, during the NYE party? What kind of journalism is this?? Going all the way on the first date, not our sweet boys.