Art can be most anything! But if you turned the corner at a museum and saw this specific exhibit, you’d be forgiven if you thought you accidentally stumbled into an ad for Helix Studios.
Two life-size “living portraits” of twunks hanging side-by-side in a gallery—but not touching. Their expressions are blank, as they stare into a camera for an indeterminate amount of time, though the sight of their bare torsos is certainly… alluring. Who are these two, and where can we watch?
That’s certainly the response X user @alexjb24 had when they first got a peek at the art on display at the National Gallery Of Victoria in Australia. “Started off thinking ‘oh HI’ when I saw this exhibit,” they wrote of their encounter with the guys.
How about we take this to the next level?
Subscribe to our newsletter for a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
But then they read what this piece was really about and “kinda choked up”:
Labeled as “Untitled (Bram)” and “Untitled (Ruel),” respectively, these pieces are part of an exhibit from Australian artist Drew Pettifer titled A Sorrowful Act: The Wreck Of The Zeewjik, one that aims to shine a light on forgotten queer history.
As the placard notes, these dual portraits tell a story from 1727, when two young male lovers (Bram, 18, and Ruel, 22) were aboard the Zeewjik, a ship porting cargo for the Dutch East India Company.
Per historical records, Bram and Ruel’s affair was discovered, and shortly after they were convicted of sodomy. Their punishment? They were marooned on separate islands in the Houtman Abrolhos archipelago, off the coast of Western Australia, where they each died alone.
Due to their trial, the young lovers’ heartbreaking tale is recognized as “the first recorded moment in (European) queer history in Australia.” Unsurprisingly, tragedy has plagued our community from the very beginning, and Pettifer’s work re-contextualizes the past in order to make us rethink our present.
Over on Gay Twitter™, the pieces seem to have their intended effect, with @alexjb24’s post—and the sight of Bram and Ruel’s perky pecs—raking in 1.8 million views and counting.
Related:
That time Italian fascists exiled a bunch of gay guys to an island & accidentally created a M4M utopia
Hello, readers! Today’s queer history lesson takes us to Italy under the reign of Mussolini.
But reactions are certainly divided. The exhibit has many in their feelings, while some fail to see how the pieces convey much of anything without the existence of the placard to spell out the real-life story. Others are taking issue with everything from the fact that it valorizes colonizers to Bram and Ruel’s age difference.
Folks, we present to you: The discourse….
Maybe one of the saddest things I've ever heard of 😔
— Christian Alexander M. Varga-Findlater (@CMVFENGINEER) January 9, 2024
Gen Z twitter is just gonna say “but the age difference” 🤦🏼♂️
— Blondie ✨ (@blonde_bttmxxx) January 9, 2024
I think we need to take away the explainers, artists have become way too reliant on them
— Lou Seale (@homo_placidus) January 9, 2024
This piece in no way attempts to communicate its content organically/internally, no one would ever know what it’s about without the caption
Ok but why were they colonising India. Would’ve been best to stay home IMO
— 🇵🇸CatNamer umberg.bsky.social (@umberghauri) January 9, 2024
Ok but how do they know they died there alone ? Gays are pretty resourceful and the first one would have seen which way the ship went to drop off the second guy. If it was me I’d build a raft and go get my man then live free together 🏝️
— R (@RatchetBatman) January 9, 2024
So, yeah, reactions to A Sorrowful Act are all over the place. But hey, it’s starting all sorts of conversations, and isn’t that what good art is supposed to do?
And, on top of that, it’s got us talking about the little-known story of Bram and Ruel and a forgotten corner of LGBTQ+ history, so it sounds like the artist Drew Pettifer’s mission is accomplished, no?
It’s even got some gears turning for a movie adaptation, with some calling for this tragic romance to be re-told on the big screen—albeit with a slightly happier ending perhaps.
need a fantasy adaption where they escape, find each other, go on a crazy adventure, and live happily ever after 😭😭😭😭
— danie (@talk_valentina) January 9, 2024
And, hey, even if the studios aren’t ready to pony up the cash for a sweeping gay romance set on the high seas, we’re sure an X-rated version would do just fine:
Related:
EXCLUSIVE: Watch romantic WWII drama ‘The Letter Men,’ based on real letters written by gay soldiers in love
Garrett Clayton and Matthew Postlethwaite star as two real-life soldiers, desperately in love but torn apart by war.
Ken A.
Gay history. Not LGBTQetc history. Maybe not gay history since that label didn’t exist either. Homosexual history, Molly history or Sodomite history. Same sex lover history.
nm4047
A bit like the photos that were found of the 2 guys. They didn’t exist in period of history, but like anything that’s going to get attention, needs to keep current with standard(s) and words of the day
ShaverC
Ken A. Agreed. Gay history.
S.anderson
@Ken: I agree. I feel like in another 10 years, the next arrogant youth movement will be sticking a feather in their hat and calling this “another story of”, whatever they call themselves… “Genderplumbus History” or whatever. It’s pernicious, strategic appropriation.
monty clift
“Molly history or Sodomite history”. Nobody knows what Molly is, and sodomite is an outdated term. A lot of this linguistic warfare from both ends has been insufferable.
Pietro D
“What’s this all about, Alfie”?
bachy
It’s a sad, historic story brought to life via photographs of two beautiful, contemporary models. The same strategy is used by “based on a true story” plays, television shows and movies: regenerating interest in a story by using beautiful actors, beautiful sets and beautiful dialogue.
RIGay
Perhaps revisit Cosmo Jarvis and “Gay Pirates”? I get choked up every time I listen to it.
still_onthemark
“These gay lovers were exposed & marooned on a deserted island in 1727.”
The headline is misleading since they were marooned on TWO separate deserted islands. Apparently the editors who wrote the headline didn’t communicate with the Editors who wrote the story.
Being marooned together on one deserted island could be pretty romantic!