Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  morning goods

PHOTOS: To Do Or Not To Dostovic

emildostovic1

MORNING GOOD — At 6’3 and 180 pounds, NYC-based Emil Dostovic appears a perfect specimen. Thankfully we found some of his earlier photos, when he was … ugh, still perfect.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (2) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (2)
By:           editor editor
On:           Oct 1, 2009
Tagged: , , , ,
25 Comments

No. 1 · allacsn

Good choice on his part to give up school and take his clothes off for a living. That young, dumb and full of cum look really works for him.
But as our Mr Brickman often says in his posts ‘go to the gym’.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 4:43 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Erick

Well, he is handsome and has a beautiful slender body.

But I wonder if someone ever taught him to smile?

When he does that he will look beautiful in a picture.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 4:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · o. please

comments like the one above bug me.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 5:03 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · o. please

i meant #1, not #2 ,

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 5:05 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · dvlaries · Member · 987 comments

Emil is fine, and things are going great until picture 12.

When are you guys going to get the message that we don’t want to see these fellows mashing on some woman? Leave those shots out.

Even straight female visitors to queerty surely want the fantasy to themselves and don’t want see the man chewing on some other dame.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 7:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · TimNCGuy

@Erick: apparently, not smiling is a “rule” in modeling similar to the rule that all models must wax every hair off their body. So, we won’t get smiles or body hair until the gods who control modeling say so.

Also, in the previous pics of Shia LeBouf we were told by a commenter that it was OK for him to not wear socks with dress shoes because he wasn’t wearing a “suit”. Well I’m pretty sure that in pic 14 here we have a suit, dress shoes and NO SOCKS. Please tell me this no socks trend is going to be short lived.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 8:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

I guess there is something to the magic of chemistry. Everything is in the right place, and better than I have ever been- yet, he doesn’t do a dang thing for me. That’s the beauty of diversity– someone for all of us to ogle.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 9:16 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · Matt

I’m 5-10 and 180lbs. I guess that makes me a fat ass. You know us 32 inch waist guys are the morbidly obese in the gay community.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 9:16 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · dk

@allacsn:
He can always go back to school, he won’t always have that body… He’s goodlooking, but the “manboy” look always makes me feel uncomfortable, like I’m lusting after something that I shouldn’t.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 9:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · wmcarpenter · Member · 96 comments

9 is somehow really great.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 10:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Bob R

Standard model in standard model poses. Nothing new and exciting here.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 11:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · OH Charlie

NICE!!! choice 4 MG

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 11:27 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · allacsn

At comment 3 and 4 – why does it bug you – my opinion has as much value as anyone elses and certainly as much as yours.

At comment 9 – sorry I disagree – a good looking man is always a good looking man. And a good looking Doctor, Lawyer, Accountant will always score higher on my gaydar than a kid who just hasn’t got fat and just because someone takes a few pictures of you it aint a career. Just a personal chice.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 12:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · jason

EAT A SANDWICH!!!!

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 4:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · alan brickman

don’t be such jealous queens..he is hawt!! hit a gym already!!

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 8:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 16 · McShane

To tall for me. long bottoms are just to much to deal with. Too much legs for the ass you get.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 9:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 17 · Lizcivious

@dvlaries: Exactly! However, this straight girl didn’t get jealous over the chick pictures this time. He’s beautiful and has a great body but he’s not scruffy or unique enough to make my panties tingle.

Posted: Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 18 · Josh

Hey, Qweerty, you should find some pics of fat, hairy, balding men, since this guy’s clearly not good enough for several of the readers here. They wanna see John Goodman, naked, since he’s representative of American svelteness, clearly.

Please.

If I want to see an overweight, hairy old guy, I can look in the mirror. What I, and everyone else (even you who so vehemently deny it and stridently call for beautiful young men like this guy to ‘Eat a burger!’ or whatever) want is to appreciate masculine beauty.

This guy has it in spades. Stop hating and just enjoy it.

Posted: Oct 2, 2009 at 2:28 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 19 · allancsn

@ comment 15 – for fuck sake play another record.

@ comment 17 – who’s hating – since when did having an opinion become wrong – we don’t all have to agree on everything. And when did anybody say they wanted overweight, hairy old guys – but if qweerty post them I’ll be happy to comment.
This is all a bit of fun for our titlilation – lighen up there are more important issues to get arsey about.

Posted: Oct 2, 2009 at 3:02 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 20 · CHIP

*Sigh* Another hot Slav…

Posted: Oct 2, 2009 at 3:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 21 · Josh

@allancsn: Hey, ALlan. Your comment was, if I read it right, “Go to a gym.” OK, so you like your men more muscular. I can respect that. I don’t personally like the overly-muscled ‘roid look, but I don’t mind a nice, naturally muscled man like, for example, Ryan Daharsh in his heyday with AAG or Luke Guldan.

My issue is with the “Eat something!” sort. That crap isn’t an opinion, it’s flat our ignorance or stupidity.

The guy is HARDLY scrawny or underfed like some meth-ed out twink. Not with that kind of definition and artistically perfect proportion. He clearly eats just enough for his metabolism to process it for the build he wants.

The people crowing for him to “eat something!” clearly have weight issues of their own to deal with, and it bothers me that they cannot just appreciate beauty as it comes. *Shrugs*

That’s MY opinion.

Posted: Oct 2, 2009 at 4:10 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Josh

@Josh: damn, it’s late…my spelling is starting to suck. That should be “flat out” not “flat our”…

*Wishes there was an “edit” option*

Posted: Oct 2, 2009 at 4:11 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 23 · NormalAdjacent

I’m 6’3″ 185lb, but I sure as hell don’t look anything like that.

Posted: Oct 3, 2009 at 12:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 24 · McShane

While he’s a little tall for ideal sex for me he’s an ideal model,. just what makes clothges look good.

Posted: Oct 3, 2009 at 2:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 25 · alan brickman

wow lets see your pics queens…jealous is never pretty

Posted: Dec 30, 2009 at 7:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.