Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

Rosie Takes O’Reilly for a Spin

0330odonnell.jpgBill O’Reilly has made it his business in recent months to stalk Rosie O’Donnell in an attempt to force her to account for what he sees as the former View host’s belief that 9/11 was an inside job. His most recent intrusion into Rosie O’s life came on Saturday when a producer from The O’Reilly Factor barged in on an O’Donnell book-signing in New York with cameras in tow. Little did they know Rosie O. had her own camera crew in tow and a modus operandi of refusing to indulge O’Reilly in that which he craves most: attention.

Keep reading to see both video feeds…

Of course, “The Factor” had its own perspective on what went down to counter Rosie’s version of events. In true “No Spin Zone” style, however, we thought we’d throw the two vids up next to each other to give you Queerty readers the last word…

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/1VqTPIuNHjk" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

[kml_flashembed movie="

" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

By:           Gregory Angelo
On:           Oct 30, 2007
Tagged: , , ,

  • 13 Comments
    • **
      **

      o’reilly is a giant douche, end of story.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 9:13 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Alexa
      Alexa

      Unfortunately he’s a douche with a large following who believe his garbage.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 9:15 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • phil
      phil

      He says she provides “comfort” to terrorists? Are you kidding me? Rosie represents what terrorists don’t like about America. She’s a socially conscious liberal lesbian who speaks her mind and expresses her right to criticize our government and the terrorists regularly. i fail to see any way that Rosie could comfort a terrorist. furthermore, and she did answer the guy’s question and would have continued talking if they had done as she asked.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 10:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Maverick69
      Maverick69

      Along with that comfort she offers comfort food too !!!

      Can’t we get Bill and Drudge in a sex scandal together?

      Oct 30, 2007 at 11:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Margareth
      Margareth

      Dear Alexa,
      You say that this O’Reilly character has ‘a large following’. 1) Remember that he is preaching directly to the neocon choir…nobody watching that rabble has any intention of changing their GOP vote whatever rubbish he, or his geusts say or do; 2) As someone who’s worked in commercial media I’m taught to look at the ‘viewer numbers’ a little differently. From my quick perusing of the ratings I estimate he attracts around 2 to 2-and-a-half million viewers per show.
      My goodness, that’s less than 1 per cent of the American population. To reiterate…his viwers: LESS THAN 1 PER CENT of the American population…or as those in the business would point out: MORE THAN 99 PER CENT OF AMERICANS DON’T WATCH!!!
      I hope this puts the outrageous “spin” on his viewer numbers into some perspective.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 11:50 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Patrick
      Patrick

      Bill O’Reilly is of course a douche bag and is the true villain here.

      But Rosie, if she hasn’t already, needs to disavow her earlier 9/11 conspiracy theory claims. She really made a blunder by allowing herself to be convince by their ideas. People who continue to promote 9/11 as an inside job don’t seem to realize their community is now seen as no different than other paranoid conspiracy communities like those which say the moon landing was faked or the holocaust never happened.

      All thoroughly debunked over and over and over.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 12:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • praenomenal
      praenomenal

      Comfort to terrorists..terrorists and Children!

      Oct 30, 2007 at 1:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • praenomenal
      praenomenal

      Patrick, Not to go off topic here, but do you have any links to info on the debunking? I have yet to see any credible evidence that explains building 7 et al. I have been out of the loop on this issue for a while and if there is new info I would love to read it.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 1:25 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jon
      Jon

      Patrick, I don’t believe Rosie ever said that 9/11 was an inside job. She did say that she did not believe it was possible for building 7 to come down by itself without having been hit by a plane. Please view http://www.wtc7.net and you will get the correct information.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 1:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Bill Perdue
      Bill Perdue

      Is this the same Bill O’Reilly of Faux News whose ultra right boss is Rupert Murdoch, gazillionaire head of Faux News, and the guy who put the ‘neo’ in ‘neo Nazi’?

      Is that the same Rupert Murdoch who hosted a big fundraiser for Hillary, inviting the ruling rich to his NY Fox News HQ where he, his darling baby boy, and by the oddest of coincidences, all the Fox executives gave her big bucks?

      Is this the same Rupert Murdoch who waxes poetic singing sings the praises of HRH HRC, like Pat Robertson, who likewise admires the winsome Hillary?

      In an interview Rita Braver of CBS News Sunday Morning asked Pat Robertson, one of the worst of Republican theocratic totalitarians, “On the Democratic side, of course, everybody’s talking about Hillary Clinton. What– what would you and your followers think about her? “

      His answer is illuminating. “Well she’s– tacking to the right as hard as she can tack. And– you know Hillary’s got some good points.”

      Pat Robertson and Rupert Murdoch know a good thing when they see it.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 2:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Heather_L_James
      Heather_L_James

      Oh god, here we go with the building 7 garbage. Do you understand people were working in that building right up to the point that the planes hit the towers? Do you understand that in a controlled demolition the charges have to be attached to the steel support beams INSIDE the walls? Don’t you think that Jane and Joe worker might have noticed that someone was removing the walls around them to place explosive charges on the steel beams in the weeks precending 9/11? And save the “fires have never caused a building collapse before” bunk. How often to jet fuel accelerated fires in buildings that just had another skyscraper fall on top of it happen? 9/11 consipiracy theorists are just as lame as wingnuts.

      Oct 30, 2007 at 2:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rick
      Rick

      Rosie said that steel doesn’t melt… uhhh, isn’t that HOW they make steel?

      Oct 30, 2007 at 4:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.