Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  legalese

Should We Let Prop 8 Stand Until a Federal Court Decides It’s Unconstitutional?

California Attorney General Jerry Brown may find Proposition 8 to be a violation of the U.S. Constitution, but his answer to Perry v. Schwarzenegger also includes this recommendation: Don’t let a federal court block Prop 8, at least not yet. How come?

Because if the issue is decided by a federal judge in Perry v. Schwarzenegger before the federal appeals process finishes up in San Francisco, California’s gays may actually find themselves with fewer rights at the end of all this.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker scheduled a hearing for next month in Perry v. Schwarzenegger to help decide whether an injunction to stay Prop 8 (and disavow the California State Supreme Court’s upholding of the law) should be considered. A.G. Brown says no — not until Ted Olson and David Boies’s federal challenge (on the grounds of violating the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment) is cleared up.

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Jun 15, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
Comments

There are no comments yet. Post yours!

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.