Larry Sinclair really believes his own hype. The Minnesota native claimed last month to have done drugs with Democrat Barack Obama, who apparently smoked crack in Sinclair’s presence and then accepted a few well-placed blowjobs. Sinclair’s so sure of his story, he’s submitting himself to a lie detector: “My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest… I didn’t want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999.” Sinclair will reportedly earn $10,000 for taking the test and $100,000 if he passes into phase two of the investigation. We’re surprised Fox hasn’t signed him up for Moment of Truth! [PageOneQ]
Get Queerty Daily
Subscribe to Queerty for a daily dose of #politics #gay #gossip stories and more19 Comments
Comments are closed.
hells kitchen guy
Some people will do anything for their Warholian 15 minutes.
hisurfer
He got 10G for that??? His story wasn’t even clever or realistic. It was poor acting. He has the blank stare shared by schizophrenics who just quit taking their meds, alien abductees, and Ron Paul supporters. How the fuck does he get 10G for this?
I should post a clip on how I licked Hillary’s clit one day while Bill was playing golf. I could use the money.
stingrae
If any thing it’s Obama’s supporters who have blank stares. Do people even know why they are supporting him other than, “He’s charismatic and good looking”?
Obama sucks.
mozzer13
How about because his proposals are not too terribly different from those of his Democratic opponent, and some of us have had all we can stand of 20 years of rule by two Machiavellian families? I think that is more than a good enough reason.
hells kitchen guy
This has nothing to do with whom you support. I support clinton, but I think this guy is a fake and a plant.
emb
Can the Clintons just not stand the notion of anyone else running in the campaign who’s not tainted by sexual carryings-on? It’s OK…this is just the sort of nonsense the republicans will be dishing out, so obama might as well develop immunity now.
Vince
Oh yeah, he forgot to mention that I was tickeling his balls as he blew him. I’ll collect my 1/2 of the 10 G’s now.
John
This guy is full of BS-the clintons are so dirty..
John
I’m going to wait until I read his book before I pass judgment.
Remember, Marion Berry was reelected.
Bitch Republic
Obama is naive and inexperienced. If Dumbs, I mean Dems nominate Obama, say hello to four years of McCain, followed by Hillary Clinton running against McCain in 2012.
emb
Bitch Republic: OK, if we’re going down THAT road, then McCain is old and stupid and Hillary is shrill and crooked. Are we all happy now with the general tone of the campaign? (And if McCain wins, it’s unlikely we’ll need to bother with a 2012 election, since we’ll all be vaporized during the terrorist attacks resulting from four more years of bellicose, divisive, beligerant, shortsighted and nonsensical bush foreign policies anyway.)
seitan-on-a-stick
Unfortunately, B. R. is probably right. This is so Rovian meets Raisin in The Sun meets Training Day. Go Hillary! Even if it’s on a vacation to Africa after the hit-job the media is doing on The Clintons. I will vote for Barack if he should be the nominee but I’ve backed too many Democratic losers so what’s one more with inexperienced Barack and his Plymouth Rock Ego against tried and true-blue Democrat Hillary Clinton. BTW – McCain whitened his yellow teeth with that I’ve already stolen this election glee of victory. Read Greg Palast’s book to find out how the Evil GOP steals it in 2008.
Mike
wow, Bitch Republic… Oppress yourself much?
Alan down in Florida
Let’s argue about this after we see the results of the lie detector test. Truth is often stranger than the fiction this seems on the surface.
Michelle
I pray that the Clinton camp had nothing to do with this, as some have alleged. While I don’t agree with the politics of the Clintons, I know they’re not dirty like *this*
leomoore
Coming up with crap like this is not something the Clinton’s have done before. This sounds more like the tactics the Republicans have used for at least the past 28 years. I suggest those of us who greatly desire someone other than another damn Republican president save our sharp witticisms for John McCain. I would vote for just about any Democrat before a Republican at this point. Hell, I would vote for Ron Paul before I would vote for a true goppy.
leomoore
Sorry, I meant to say the Clintons have NOT done before. Mind races while fingers lag.
kablamo
Wow! Do you guys even know any Republicans or Independents? Conservatives I know are talking about staying because McCain is the nominee and moderate Republicans and Independents are talking about not only voting for Barack, but switching their registration. This election isn’t just about narrowly winning the White House its about voting for more of the same or voting for a chance at political realignment that could fuel some real progressive reforms.
New Mexico Fan
So what are you basing the real progressive reforms on? His record shows in fact that he is satisfied with changing things very little.
People and Super Delegates have no idea at all about what he has accomplished, even though they support him. One Sentor sent me an email that opened with Marie Schriver, Caroline Kennedy, and Oprah. Like these people 1) have never been politcally active, and 2)know anything about making change in a bureacracy (Oprah is the supreme commander of her show).
So if you are basing your support of Obama on real progressive reforms you should start praying now 1) to get rid of all the current Reps and Senators, and 2) get rid of all the top civilian employees (this would take an act of God in 4 years).
So in four years, we will be electing a new President, and the Democrats will be fighting for thier lives again, as He will not have accomplished much, and his report card against his hyped promises will be dismal.
Good Luck with that.