In the streets of Victorian London, where whispers and glances were often more telling than words, the story of Frederick William Park and Thomas Ernest Boulton—known to their friends and the public as Fanny and Stella—emerged as a captivating tale of resistance, passion, and courage.
These two individuals were not merely actors who pretended to be sisters but pioneers, unapologetically exploring and embracing their gender-bending personas on and off the stage. Together, they wove a narrative that defied societal norms, challenging the strict Victorian values of their time.
A Partnership Forged in Theatre
The story of Fanny and Stella begins in the bustling theatre district of London, where men dressing as women was not uncommon on stage in the 19th century. Cross-dressing in the theater was a centuries-old legacy; men played Shakespeare’s female roles.
But Park and Boulton took their onstage personas into their private lives, attending parties and public gatherings as the glamorous Fanny and Stella. This choice was more than mere performance. It was an expression of identity. The men even wrote letters to their lovers as their female personas and referred to one another in letters as females. The duo became iconic figures in London’s theatrical and social scene.
Arrest and Trial: A Public Spectacle
However, this unique relationship soon caught the attention of authorities. On April 28, 1870, police apprehended Fanny and Stella, both 23 years old at the time, with their friend, identified in articles as Mundell, outside London’s Royal Strand Theatre for conspiring and inciting an unnatural offense.
The trial that followed was nothing short of a circus and media spectacle. The display of photographs, reading of private letters, and lively courtroom exchanges was drama too good to pass up. Fanny and Stella even appeared in female garments at their initial hearing, although much to the crowd’s chagrin, they came dressed as men for subsequent days of the trial.
The prosecution struggled to define a crime, as neither cross-dressing nor being gay or transgender were illegal. The police decided on sodomy, supported by only scant evidence.
The defense claimed the cross-dressing “was only a stupid act of folly,” but evidence and eyewitness testimony proved otherwise. One policeman even testified that he’d seen Fanny and Stella out and about in women’s clothing for nearly a year.
Thomas Shenton, an inspector of police, testified about the search conducted at 13 Wakefield-street. Many dresses, skirts, cloaks, shoes, chignons, bonnets, and other feminine items were discovered and cataloged.
Prosecutors presented as evidence photographs of Fanny and Stella in female attire and personal correspondence. The defendants’ defense attorney objected to reading the letters, but the Magistrate ruled that they were pertinent to the case and have become public record.
Here is a letter from Fanny Winnifred Park to a man named Arthur, dated November 22:
My dearest Arthur,
You must really excuse me from interfering in matrimonial squabbles (for I am sure the present is no more than that); and though I am, as you say, Stella’s confidante in most things, that which you wish to know she keeps locked up in her own breast. My own opinion on the subject varies fifty times a day when I see you together.
She may sometimes treat you brusquely; but, on the other hand, see how she stands up for your dignity of position (in the matter of Ellils’s parts for instance), so that I really cannot form an opinion on the subject. As to all the things she said to you the other night, she may have been tight and did not know all she was saying, so that by the time you get my answer you will both be laughing over the whole affair, as Stella and I did when we quarrelled and fought down here, don’t you remember when I slapped her face?
Do not think me unkind, dear, as really I have told you all I know, and have not an opinion worth having to offer you. My address is the same, as I do not move out of the street. I have enclosed a note to you in the one I wrote Stella last night. Good-bye, dear.
Ever yours,
Fan.
Despite the sensational evidence and intense public scrutiny, a jury acquitted Fanny and Stella due to insufficient evidence.
The Legacy of Fanny & Stella
Fanny and Stella were pioneers who lived their lives boldly in a repressive Victorian England. The heavy focus on norms and standards made life challenging for everyone, especially for people who lived well outside the norms. Fanny and Stella’s courage to live authentically continues to inspire discussions around gender identity, societal norms, and the law.
Their story remains a striking example of how personal identity and societal norms intersect, collide, and ultimately shape our understanding of what it means to be true to oneself.
ShaverC
“Pioneers” makes it seem like they were taking on a cause. If you had done any research or read the book based on them, they come across more as rich, indulgent, brats who were often (allegedly) prostitutes.
jcool
gee, “pioneers” makes me think of covered wagons. but you do you.
Joshooeerr
Yes, and I would also seriously question whether either Fanny or Stella were “living authentically” or challenging gender norms. You could more convincingly put a case that they were confused and adrift in the absence of any choices for a positive queer identity in society of the day. The drag was more important to them because it gave them a way to meet men under the cover of subterfuge, and it allowed them to create a community and camaraderie that was otherwise difficult. It also allowed them to make a living. There’s a good chance that transported to another era Fanny and Stella would have been just another pair of sex-crazed gay guys. There’s almost nothing in the book that suggests they were trans.
Karlis
Many years later, the show “Little Britain” had the two main characters swanning around in unconvincing garb and saying “We’re LADIES!” “We’re two LADIES!”
Diplomat
Cross dressing: I would never outlaw it but it’s my least favorite fetish.